Wii-U to be weaker than PS3 & 360

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 11, 2005
526
40
0
#1
The PlayStation 4 may block the usage of used games and the Xbox 720 may make the jump to using Blu-ray discs. We don’t know. All the rumors and speculation about Orbis and Durango are just that: rumors and speculation. What we can be sure of is that both machines will feature significant graphical upgrades over the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. Nintendo’s next machine though, the Wii U, may not be able to make the same claim. According to some developers, Nintendo’s first HD console can’t output graphics that are even on par with Microsoft and Sony’s current machines.

Developers speaking with GamesIndustry International on Monday had more than a few disparaging comments in store for Nintendo’s upcoming tablet-controlled console. “It’s not up to same level as the PS3 or the 360. The graphics are just not as powerful,” said one source.

A representative of Nintendo of America neither confirmed nor denied the report for Digital Trends. “We do not focus on technology specs. We understand that people like to dissect graphics and processing power, but the experience of playing will always be more important than raw numbers.”

Small comfort to developers that must develop for multiple platforms for their games to be commercially viable.
Another source cited as a “developer at a major company” supported the first source’s claim. “Yeah, that’s true. It doesn’t produce graphics as well as the PS3 or the 360. There aren’t as many shaders, it’s not as capable,” said the source. It isn’t all bad news though. “Some things are better, mostly as a result of it being a more modern design. But overall the Wii U just can’t quite keep up.”
Nintendo has yet to disclose just what the Wii U is and isn’t capable of. The majority of games already announced for the device are PS3 and 360 games though, including Ninja Gaiden 3, Batman: Arkham City, and unreleased titles like Darksiders II and Aliens: Colonial Marines. Based on these developers’ comments though, those titles may not look quite as nice as they do on competing machines.

It’s possible that the Wii U’s poor graphical prowess is a concession made for its unique controller. The tablet isn’t just a control interface, it’s been positioned as an independent play screen, letting the player enjoy a game on the controller rather than a television the Wii U’s hooked up to. If Nintendo has devoted more of the device’s resources to accommodating that process rather than investing in a beefier GPU, that could explain what developers are reporting.

http://news.yahoo.com/developers-claim-wii-u-weaker-ps3-360-nintendo-210201325.html

And from http://www.computerandvideogames.co...-as-good-as-ps3-but-its-still-not-as-capable/

Sources said graphical quality "won't be a problem" on Nintendo's new console, but a drop in CPU horsepower compared to 360 and PS3 could see Wii U lag behind in areas such as complicated physics and AI.
"Assumptions that Wii U games will look like 'up rezzed' current-gen titles with better textures aren't quite right. They'll look just as good, but not better," one developer told CVG. "You shouldn't expect anything special from a graphics point of view," they added.

A second source working on a big name franchise said GPU and RAM power "won't be a problem" on the new console but, again, claimed Wii U struggles to match PS3 and 360 in processing power.

"We're still working on dev machines but there have definitely been some issues [in porting PS3/360 games]," our source said. "It's not actually a problem getting things up and running because the architecture is pretty conventional, but there are constraints with stuff like physics and AI processing because the hardware isn't quite as capable."

The same source concluded, bluntly: "I suppose you don't need sophisticated physics to make a Mario game."
 
Aug 13, 2009
626
277
0
#5
Game informer said the Wii-U's performance should be at least 50% more powerful than the 360.

Though they said it wasnt confirmed, considering the age of the 360 and the PS3, it could be true.
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#6
While Nintendo still hasn’t disclosed the internal hardware of the Wii U, it doesn’t stop many from specualting on just what might power the new console. Most put their money on some form of IBM CPU + AMD graphics, which is the most realistic bet, since both the Wii and GameCube were powered by IBM CPUs and AMD/ATI graphics chips.

Many developers and publishers already have working Wii U dev kits in their possession, meaning they’re more likely to know what’s on the inside. And according to game industry analyst Arvind Bhatia from Sterne Agee, who spoke to a number of developers, the Wii U hardware is 50% more powerful than the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

If that’s the case, the Wii U is looking to have some potent hardware, and games will certainly be able to outshine those on competing consoles. Of course, we’ll know for sure when Nintendo reveals the full specs of the console — if they do reveal it at all. If we recall correctly, Nintendo never disclosed the hardware used in the Wii, although it was easy to find out.

http://wiiudaily.com/2011/06/wii-u-is-50-more-powerful-than-ps3-and-xbox-360/

Again, nothing is confirmed until E3, and even then Nintendo themselves aren't going to be saying anything about specs, so we won't really know until the system is released.
 

L.D.S.

The Bakersman
Aug 14, 2006
19,934
4,044
113
40
Mizzourah
#7
Lol Yahoo's writers are a bunch of propagandizing assholes. I read some of theory articles just so i can find ways to criticize bad writing.