WHY I THINK MICHAEL JAKSON IS INNOCENT

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

OPINION ON WHAT IS THE CASE WITH MICHAEL JAKSON

  • BEIN' FRAMED

    Votes: 21 27.6%
  • PUBLICITY STUNT

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • STUPIDEST PEDEPHILE

    Votes: 52 68.4%

  • Total voters
    76
May 16, 2002
454
2
0
40
#21
This thread needs more Michael Jackson jokes :

What's the difference between a plastic bag and Michael Jackson?
One is made of synthetic material and dangerous to have around small children, the other holds groceries.

The Difference between Michael Jackson and McDonald's?
None, they both like 45 year old meat between 2 year old buns.

What do Michael Jackson and Rum have in common?
They both come in small tots.

Why are Michael Jackson's pants so tight anyways?
Well, they aren't his...

What's the difference between Michael Jackson and Zits?
Zits don't pop on your face before high school.

How many Michael Jacksons does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None, they're all too busy screwing kids ...
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#23
ColdBlooded said:
What kinda parent lets their kid sleep over at Michael Jackson's house anyway?
somebody (the DA) should also look into child endangerment charges for the parents, either that or they are to stupid and shouldnt be raising children.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#24
2-0-Sixx said:
Also, I think a lot of them don't think he's a child molester.
i remember seeing this report on ABC after he was arrested friday. and they were interviewing other parents that send their kids there that were saying that they wouldnt stop sending them there.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#25
miggidy said:
EDJ you ain't alone man.
Unlike most muthafuckas I will hold my judgement until I hear the facts. But so far, this shit is a bit suspicious.
so will i but it appears very, very bad. i mean tell me honestly, your a father, after what happened in 1993 would you let your child go over to his house and spend the night???

miggidy said:
For one thing, 10 years ago the first accusations about his alleged sexual abuse of a 12 year old boy proved to be bullshit.
no, actually from what i have heard they were legit!!
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#26
EDJ said:
WHY I SAY THIS IS CAUSE HE DID PAY THE FAMILY AND IF MICHAEL DID IN FACT MOLEST THE CHILD, WHY WOULD THE FAMILY SETTLE FOR MONEY?
maybe, because they know that the kid is going to be screwed up in the head for life and he will probly need to see a shitload of doctors to help him and without the money they wouldnt be able to afford them.

i dont know what was in the families head, i, you, us, we can only imagine.

i gave Scott Peterson the benefit of the doubt,.
i gave Kobe the benefit of the doubt
but when it comes to (possible) abuse of an innocent kid i will side on the side of the kid.

has any1 heard something about some lovenotes that MJ sent this boy, i think the DA has them. i can be wrong here i only heard this on a newsbrief so i dont know how accurate it is.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#28
Mcleanhatch said:
has any1 heard something about some lovenotes that MJ sent this boy, i think the DA has them. i can be wrong here i only heard this on a newsbrief so i dont know how accurate it is.
http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.jsp?sectionid=1260&storyid=534904
Jackson's explicit letters seized
By CAROLINE GRAHAM and SHARON CHURCHER in London
November 24, 2003

EXPLICIT letters and poems said to have been written by Michael Jackson to his alleged victim will form the centrepiece of the sex-abuse case against him.

Police seized at least a dozen letters during the raid on Jackson's Neverland ranch last week.

"The district attorney is convinced these letters will be crucial to the case against Jackson," a source close to the investigation said yesterday.

"The boy told investigators about letters and poems and their precise location inside Michael's home. These letters were among the evidence seized, along with videotapes.

"They are very explicit and intimate and show a degree of familiarity. Basically, they appear to be love letters from Michael to the boy."

The accuser, 12-year-old Los Angeles cancer victim Gavin Arvizo, also told police Jackson's pet name for him was Rubba.

"The boy first told this to his therapist, then repeated it to police," the source said.

"He said Jackson called him Rubba because one of the games they used to play was called rubba rubba. The boy said, 'Michael told me he was my rubba rubba friend."'

Although police handling the case in Santa Barbara, California, have been barred from revealing any details, it is understood the alleged abuse took place in February.

Jackson is said to have befriended Gavin -- who, during a controversial British documentary screened earlier this year, admitted having shared a bed with the singer -- over a long period.

A source close to 45-year-old Jackson said: "For the past five or six years, he's taken kids from fractured homes and nurtured them as a father figure. As they get older, he teaches them fun things to do.

"Michael says he learned this from an adult when he was a teenager. No-one on his staff ever said anything. He's a tyrant. Everybody obeys the man."

Another Jackson source said: "The boy told of everything that went on and described things in Michael's closets, his bathroom, what was under his bed."

In her statements to police, Gavin's mother, Janet Ventura, has revealed that Jackson encouraged her son to call him "Daddy".

Ms Ventura has claimed she, Gavin and his two siblings were held virtual prisoners at Neverland, 100km north of Santa Barbara.

When she learned of her son's accusations of molestation -- which included claims that Jackson plied him with wine and sleeping pills -- she fled with her family in the dead of night.

A source close to district attorney Tom Sneddon, who will prosecute the case, said: "The DA is very confident with the evidence he has. This includes letters, videos and computer files. They believe they have enough to nail Jackson."

Jackson's legal team is said to be encouraging him to consider a plea bargain, possibly an insanity defence that would allow him to serve time in a state mental hospital instead of jail.

There was speculation yesterday that the singer raised his $3 million bail with the help of Miami-based Al Malnik, a lawyer for notorious gangster Meyer Lansky, who died in 1983.

Malnik reportedly began making large loans to Jackson when his career nosedived.

Malnik, 69, was cited by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission in 1980 and 1992 as a person of unsuitable character.

The prosecution source said: "It just gets weirder and weirder. Michael supposedly has financial problems, but hiring someone with Mob connections is bizarre."

Prosecutors are said to be spreading a net around the world for other alleged victims. One boy of special interest is said to be in El Salvador, another in South Africa.

They are also said to be considering quizzing the son of an English premiership footballer.

Charges of aiding and abetting are likely to be filed against members of Jackson's entourage.

At the same time as the Neverland swoop, police raided two homes in Los Angeles.

One was reportedly the residence of Marc Schaffel, a gay video producer who filmed the rebuttal tape Jackson released just after Martin Bashir's British documentary aired.
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#29
Droopy Eye said:
The allegations wasn't proved to be bullshit, the boy could even describe what MJs penis looked like.
MJ payed a shitload of money to the boy's family to shut him up and not go further with the charges.
Why would anyone who is innocent pay millions to avoid a trial?

[jeopardy music : dun-dun-dun dun-dun-dun]

Because he is guilty goddammit!
Sorry bro, I'm a father and I understand the extent of a father's love for his kid(s). I would never ever take "shut up" money from a man who molests my kid(s).
I would never rest until justice is served.
I am sure any parent would feel the same....
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#30
Mcleanhatch said:
so will i but it appears very, very bad. i mean tell me honestly, your a father, after what happened in 1993 would you let your child go over to his house and spend the night???
I wouldn't let my son spend the night over anyone's home of whom I do not know personally.

Mcleanhatch said:

no, actually from what i have heard they were legit!!
Peep my response to Droopy above....
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#31
miggidy said:
Peep my response to Droopy above....
miggidy said:
Sorry bro, I'm a father and I understand the extent of a father's love for his kid(s). I would never ever take "shut up" money from a man who molests my kid(s).
what if a child was so messed up in the head that they were going to need to spend 100's of thousands of dollars on shrinks, and other like minded doctors, and the parents are just struggling to survive to begin with???

Mcleanhatch said:
maybe, because they know that the kid is going to be screwed up in the head for life and he will probly need to see a shitload of doctors to help him and without the money they wouldnt be able to afford them.

i dont know what was in the families head, i, you, us, we can only imagine.
 
May 14, 2003
713
12
0
#34
EDJ said:
^I HEARD. BUT WHY IS CUZZ STILL OUT THERE THEN? WHY IS HE FIgHTIN' ALL THESE ALLEgATIONS? WHY IS PARENTS PUTTIN' THEY CHILDREN IN JEOPARDY AFTER THE FACT? YOU KNOW WHY? CAUSE THEY WANT MONEY. THEY KNOW CUZZ AIN'T THAT STUPID TO TRY TO DO N-E-THANg AFTER THE FACT HE BEEN ALLEgEDLY EXPOSED. WHAT PARENT IN THEY RIgHT MIND WOULD EXPOSE THEY CHILDREN TO AN ALLEDgED CHILD MOLESTER? I'LL TELL YOU WHAT KIND, ONE THAT HAS DOLLAR SIgNS IN THEY EYES.
THATS REAL!!!!
 
May 1, 2002
2,930
567
0
41
#36
I THINK MICHEAL DIDN'T HAVE A CHILD HOOD HE GREW UP UNDER PRSSURE TO PERFORM FROM HIS DAD...DID U GUYS EVER SEE THE JACKSON FAMILY MOVIE ON VH1 HIS DAD WAS ALWAYS ON THERE ASS TO PERFORM N PRACTICE THEY DIDN'T HAVE TYME FOR LITTLE KID SHIT, PLAY WITH TOYS, GROW UP WITH OTHER KIDS, AND ALL THE KID SHIT. THEY WERE ALL BOUT PERFORMING N MAKING MONEY. I THINK MICHEAL WAS THE ONLY ONE EFFECTED BECAUSE HE BECAME THE BIGGEST STAR OUT OF THE FAMILY...SO NOW HE JUST TRYING TO LIVE OUT HIS CHILDHOOD BY KICKIN IT WITH LITTLE 12 YEAR OLD KIDS....THATS FUKIN WIERD FOR A 44 YEAR MAN TO BE WITH LITTLE BOYZ....BUT WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS


ALSO THE MEDIA LOVES THIS SHIT EVERYTIME A NON WHITE CELEBRITY GETS INVOLED IN SUM SHIT THEY JUMP ON IT LIKE IT WAS A PIECE OF FREE STEAK
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#37
mExIcaNox4 said:
ALSO THE MEDIA LOVES THIS SHIT EVERYTIME A NON WHITE CELEBRITY GETS INVOLED IN SUM SHIT THEY JUMP ON IT LIKE IT WAS A PIECE OF FREE STEAK
didnt the media jump on Gary Condit, Bill Clinton, Rush Limbaugh, Scott Peterson, and Robert Blake???

i refuse to believe that race has anything to do with this
 
May 16, 2002
454
2
0
40
#38
Mcleanhatch said:
didnt the media jump on Gary Condit, Bill Clinton, Rush Limbaugh, Scott Peterson, and Robert Blake???

i refuse to believe that race has anything to do with this



Click picture to download an amusing video.

I feel that continual overuse of the "racist" label is going to lead to "boy who cried wolf" syndrome.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#39
^IT ALREADY HAS IN THE MINDS OF A BUNCH OF WHITE FOLK. AND THAT VIDEO YOU SHOWED JUST SHOWS ME HOW WHITE PEOPLE TRY TO CORNER A BLAK MAN AND SEE THANgS DIFFERENTLY, WHEN THE RACISM IS A SUBTLE ONE.

AND I AgREE WITH MEXICANOX4.