Whos gonna win it all in the finals?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
N

Nitro GH

Sicc OG
#6
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#6
caffeine said:
@CZAR- now your going with the LAKERS, whatever happend to the QUEERZ.. fake busta
Click to expand...
CZAR and BAMMER are just saying the Lakers cause I called them on some shit. I pointed out how they talk shit about the refs helping the Lakers to win a title, then they say the Lakers arnt going to win shit this year. They are just protecting their excuse, no more, no less. I could show you a shitload of threads with CZAR going on and on about how the Kings were going to be the 2003 champs, but like I said in other posts, these two agree with other regardless. Now here is proof to show everyone.

LAKERS
 
caff

caff

Sicc OG
#8
May 10, 2002
17,965
259
83
48
#8
@nitro- i remember when the lakers had thier down's, CZar typed that the lakers wont even make it to the playoffs.. all suddenly thier in the playoffs and a 4th title...
 
K

KINGCZAR

Sicc OG
#11
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#11
Are yall that stupid!! I said "Fakerz" out of sarcasm!! Nitro u should know that!! The Fakerz aint winnin shit!! Yall will see come June!! And caffeine, uza mark so stop actin like u know sports trick!! GOT EM!!!
 
N

Nitro GH

Sicc OG
#18
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#18
BAMMER said:
http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30759&highlight=Lakers+regardless
Click to expand...
Well, props on picking them to make the playoffs, but theres nothing in their that I read about winning a title. I also didnt see any doubt either, so I wouldnt necessarily hold you to the same standards as CZAR in this case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom