Hit The Blunt said:
But here is the question. Is it possible for a real terrorist to make an attack on America without half this board blaming it on the US? I would say no. While skepticism of motives is good I would urge people not to go to far.....as there is a fine line before skepticism can make you blind. Therefore at a point a persons skepticism can be a self defeating cause since it was blindness they were trying to avoid by being skeptical.
to answer your question i would say it is possible for a real "terrorist" to attack. it all lies on what the person considers a terrorist. if you are thinking of an olive skinned person,with a turban, a lot of facial hair and black hair you may consider him a terrorist. if you're thinking of someone with a blue suit,gun,badge and a nightstick he may be a terrorist.
its GOOD that half this board would go out on a limb and say it WASNT a terrorist. over half the board was saying BIN LADEN did the 9-11 attacks. yet
NO evidence that the american government has shown/given would be able to convict him in a court of law.
america is guilty of terrorist actions. look at countries like cuba and columbia.
america is guilty of supporting these so called "terrorist". who gave saddam his weapons during the 80's? who trained al-queda?
are you a skeptic?
people are starting to wake up thats all.......no need to stay blind...
so what if half the people on the board felt a certain way?
are they NOT entitled to their own opinions? even if they have opinions and support something they know nothing about?
:H:
