what is this world coming to??????

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#3
what is the world coming to cuz a titty got exposed on tv? you sound like the lil old ladies that complained when elvis was dancin on some old school tonight show, whats wrong with you
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#8
Fuckin homos takin over television broadcasting....
A dude can show all the butt cheeks he wants but when we get one split second tittie shot, "oh it's a problem now"....

Football and titties, can't get any better than that....
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
42
#10
Man... I was watching that shit with my 4 yr old niece and 6 yr old nephew.

that shit aint cool when you got little kids around. Some nasty lookin cracked out lady gets her floppy tit exposed on national tv.. nah, that aint cool at all.

how old are you guys? you sound like a bunch of fuckin 14 yr olds.. "what you talkin bout, pussy? whats wrong with titties?"

theres a time and place for that shit you fuckin neanderthals. grow up.
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#15
Psycho,

I have a 3 year old boy and I could care less if he caught a glimpse of a tittie. It wasn't long ago he was suckin on one and to him it wouldn't be that much of a big deal.
Kids only know what we teach them, it is grown muthafuckas who have an issue with this. We raise them with the mentality that they should get all pissy for lookin at a dangling tittie and you'll have what we're seeing today.

Is it appropriate? Probably not.
But I tend to focus on real damaging issues such as a lying ass President on TV and the media who influences everyone to fall under his spell.
There is much more damaging shit on TV than seeing a pixelated tittie floppin which you can barely make out in slow motion while zoomed in....
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#17
miggidy said:
I have a 3 year old boy

THIS ^^^^ IS THE REASON WHY I BROUGHT THIS UP.


miggidy said:
Is it appropriate? Probably not.
^^^^^^^^^ SO IF IT ISNT APPROPRIATE WHY SHOULD WE TOLERATE IT.

I PERSONALLY DIDNT MIND IT, I AS A MAN, WILL LOOK AT ALL TITS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.


BUT I TOO LIKE PSYLOGIC HAD A 13 YEAR OLD BROTHER AND 6 AND 10 YEAR OLD NEICES. ALONG WITH MY FRIENDS 8 YEAR OLD SON. THAT ISNT COOL.

THESE PEOPLE (JANET, JUSTIN, MTV) KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THEY KNEW WHAT THE AUDIENCE WAS. THEY KNEW THAT ENTIRE FAMILIES WOULD BE WATCHING THIS AND THAT MANY PEOPLE WOULD FEEL OFFENDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT IF NELLIE OR DITTI, ROCK, JUSTIN PULLED THEIR COCKS OUT?? WOULD YOU GUYS FEEL OFFENDED??? OF COURSE YOU WOULD!!!

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THIS WASNT THE PLACE TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS. IF THEY WANT TO DO IT ON CABLE ALL THE POWER TO THEM. BUT DONT DO IT ON BROADCAST TV WHEN ENTIRE FAMILIES ARE WATCHING!!!!
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#18
You have a 13 year old brother and are worried that he's looking at titties? I wonder about you...
Besides if you want to complain, complain to national geographic or the Discovery channel when they show titties it's educational but when Janet pulls her out its offensive? Shit, its not like she pulled out her snatch, although that would have been welcomed!
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#19
^^^^
No shit.
You know what does bother me from television?
Animal porn!

That's right them animal channel and discovery people are fucking beastiality perverts.
Why would anyone wanna see animals fucking?
"Oh it's educational". Oh really? Sick fuck....

Moving on,
Mclean what I meant is that it's not appropriate to bear it all on TV in the first place. It gives little girls the wrong idea.
These entertianers influence people, look at all these hood rats signin half naked on television.
What's the difference between a thong and Janet's nipple ornament? Shit I bet the nipple ring covered more of her breast than a thong covers a bitches ass.

We want to start complaining about this shit? Then lets be consistant at least. Which means no more naked baby commercials as well. I bet there's some sick pedaphile participating in a tugg-o-war versus himself while watchin them commercials. But no, no one bitches a storm over that.

And while we're at it, lets make it a rule not to let fat females wear tight clothing on television. Now that is sick....
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#20
Mcleanhatch said:
THIS ^^^^ IS THE REASON WHY I BROUGHT THIS UP.




^^^^^^^^^ SO IF IT ISNT APPROPRIATE WHY SHOULD WE TOLERATE IT.

I PERSONALLY DIDNT MIND IT, I AS A MAN, WILL LOOK AT ALL TITS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.


BUT I TOO LIKE PSYLOGIC HAD A 13 YEAR OLD BROTHER AND 6 AND 10 YEAR OLD NEICES. ALONG WITH MY FRIENDS 8 YEAR OLD SON. THAT ISNT COOL.

THESE PEOPLE (JANET, JUSTIN, MTV) KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND THEY KNEW WHAT THE AUDIENCE WAS. THEY KNEW THAT ENTIRE FAMILIES WOULD BE WATCHING THIS AND THAT MANY PEOPLE WOULD FEEL OFFENDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT IF NELLIE OR DITTI, ROCK, JUSTIN PULLED THEIR COCKS OUT?? WOULD YOU GUYS FEEL OFFENDED??? OF COURSE YOU WOULD!!!

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THIS WASNT THE PLACE TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS. IF THEY WANT TO DO IT ON CABLE ALL THE POWER TO THEM. BUT DONT DO IT ON BROADCAST TV WHEN ENTIRE FAMILIES ARE WATCHING!!!!
lol calm down on all the exclamation marks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

McLeanhatch, I haven't seen you this wound up since Bryant Gumbel quite the today show!