What do you guys think about Haarp and Project Blue Beam?
- Thread starter Speedy
- Start date
No he didn't
http://theantipress.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-over-ideological-delusion-hugo.html
On January 19, Spanish newspaper ABC, a newspaper of record in Spain, published a story entitled Chavez accuses US of causing earthquake in Haiti.
The story was quickly picked up by websites around the globe - most quoting Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez as saying the U.S. used a new tectonic weapon to induce the Haitian earthquake. This was, according to Chavez - "only a drill, and the final target is destroying and taking over Iran".
Within the actual story, ABC noted that the information came from an obscure opinion post on the website of a Venezuelan state television channel, VIVE Television. The post referenced a supposed Russian military report on American seismic weapons.
All quotes subsequently attributed to Chavez regarding Haiti and earthquake weapons were in fact direct quotes from this web posting - none of which was ever uttered by Chavez.
Spurred on by the international attention being received by its first story, ABC posted a second article on January 20 under the banner The Secret Weapon to Cause Earthquakes in which it cites Chavez as having blamed the US for razing Haiti.
By the time the story had run its course, it had been covered with varying degrees of accuracy by corporate news channels, foreign outlets eager to accuse the U.S. of another evil deed, and conspiracy websites happy to have their ideas officially validated.
In the end, it serves as one more reminder to those who prefer truth over ideological delusion: there are some subjects for which the myths of journalistic standards will still be displayed - stories about the government of Venezuela are not one of those subjects.
http://theantipress.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-over-ideological-delusion-hugo.html
On January 19, Spanish newspaper ABC, a newspaper of record in Spain, published a story entitled Chavez accuses US of causing earthquake in Haiti.
The story was quickly picked up by websites around the globe - most quoting Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez as saying the U.S. used a new tectonic weapon to induce the Haitian earthquake. This was, according to Chavez - "only a drill, and the final target is destroying and taking over Iran".
Within the actual story, ABC noted that the information came from an obscure opinion post on the website of a Venezuelan state television channel, VIVE Television. The post referenced a supposed Russian military report on American seismic weapons.
All quotes subsequently attributed to Chavez regarding Haiti and earthquake weapons were in fact direct quotes from this web posting - none of which was ever uttered by Chavez.
Spurred on by the international attention being received by its first story, ABC posted a second article on January 20 under the banner The Secret Weapon to Cause Earthquakes in which it cites Chavez as having blamed the US for razing Haiti.
By the time the story had run its course, it had been covered with varying degrees of accuracy by corporate news channels, foreign outlets eager to accuse the U.S. of another evil deed, and conspiracy websites happy to have their ideas officially validated.
In the end, it serves as one more reminder to those who prefer truth over ideological delusion: there are some subjects for which the myths of journalistic standards will still be displayed - stories about the government of Venezuela are not one of those subjects.
This is kind of old news in the "truth" movement, both are very real imo. I am close to positive that Project Bluebeam will be the major event come 2012. Just google these topics and you will get plenty of articles, I even found a site that tracks the use of haarp on our ionosphere using a magnetometer.
Here is what it looked like when Katrina hit.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20050829
Here is what it looked like around the time of the Haiti earthquake.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20100112
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20100111
Here is the Chinese earthquake from may 2008.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20080412
How to: Set the plot width to 3 days. Set the plot scale to 2000nt. Go online and find some dates on recent "natural" disasters and get some idea of exactly how much they control our weather.
Here is what it looked like when Katrina hit.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20050829
Here is what it looked like around the time of the Haiti earthquake.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20100112
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20100111
Here is the Chinese earthquake from may 2008.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi put 20080412
How to: Set the plot width to 3 days. Set the plot scale to 2000nt. Go online and find some dates on recent "natural" disasters and get some idea of exactly how much they control our weather.
HAARP is the cause of the haiti quake. http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html check out the induction magnetometer and the date of haiti earthquake.Now theres quakes going off like a stack of dominoes. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ cause and effect.
Turns out it's an average year for earthquakes
By Bruce Newman
[email protected]
Posted: 04/14/2010 05:22:14 PM PDT
Updated: 04/14/2010 10:32:01 PM PDT
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14884680
For many Californians, it is science fiction's ultimate doomsday scenario: A large earthquake in another part of the world ignites a long seismic fuse that races around the globe, unleashing a cataclysmic quake here.
On the heels of Tuesday's devastating earthquake in China — a magnitude 6.9 event, according to the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park — it seemed like a plausible idea. "It's certainly a question we wrestle with," said USGS seismologist Tom Parsons. "How linked are these earthquakes?"
As it turns out, not very.
April shakers in Sumatra (7.7) and Mexico (7.2), an 8.8 monster off the coast of Chile in February, and January's ruinous 7.0 Haiti quake left so many people nervously wondering whether the apocalypse was imminent that the USGS issued a news release Wednesday under the headline, "Is Recent Earthquake Activity Unusual? Scientists Say No."
The USGS found that since 1900, the annual average for magnitude 7.0 or higher earthquakes is 16, putting 2010 on course for a fairly normal year, with six so far. "A lot of the quakes this year have unfortunately happened in populated areas, and as a result casualties and damage are in the news," Parsons said. "The variability year to year is very large, but the rate this year is not higher than normal."
Parsons refused to call the possibility of a seismic China Syndrome sci-fi hogwash, however. Could what happened near the mountains of Tibet affect us here?
"That's an open question," he said. "When a big earthquake happens, we see seismicity rates rising, temporarily but quite significantly, as the surface waves from these big quakes travel around the planet." But he cited an unpublished study that indicates big earthquakes don't trigger other big earthquakes.
"The Sumatra quake lit up parts of the globe everywhere," he said. "So in that sense, it's valid to ask, Is there some kind of a physical link?" Parsons examined mega-quakes for the past 30 years, and could find no evidence that one led to another. "That doesn't say it couldn't happen," he said, "but over the last few decades it doesn't appear it has."
Popular culture has contributed to the apocalyptic quake talk. The 2004 TV movie "10.5" and "Crack in the World" from 1965 suggested the Really, Really Big One could turn the planet inside out.
"The idea comes up from time to time, but there doesn't appear to be the fault necessary to produce such an event," Parsons said. "In terms of a cataclysmic event, you really need a fault that's already in existence to break. The energy required to fracture intact rock is so great, the forces just aren't there to start a new fault all at once and cause a giant earthquake."
By Bruce Newman
[email protected]
Posted: 04/14/2010 05:22:14 PM PDT
Updated: 04/14/2010 10:32:01 PM PDT
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14884680
For many Californians, it is science fiction's ultimate doomsday scenario: A large earthquake in another part of the world ignites a long seismic fuse that races around the globe, unleashing a cataclysmic quake here.
On the heels of Tuesday's devastating earthquake in China — a magnitude 6.9 event, according to the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park — it seemed like a plausible idea. "It's certainly a question we wrestle with," said USGS seismologist Tom Parsons. "How linked are these earthquakes?"
As it turns out, not very.
April shakers in Sumatra (7.7) and Mexico (7.2), an 8.8 monster off the coast of Chile in February, and January's ruinous 7.0 Haiti quake left so many people nervously wondering whether the apocalypse was imminent that the USGS issued a news release Wednesday under the headline, "Is Recent Earthquake Activity Unusual? Scientists Say No."
The USGS found that since 1900, the annual average for magnitude 7.0 or higher earthquakes is 16, putting 2010 on course for a fairly normal year, with six so far. "A lot of the quakes this year have unfortunately happened in populated areas, and as a result casualties and damage are in the news," Parsons said. "The variability year to year is very large, but the rate this year is not higher than normal."
Parsons refused to call the possibility of a seismic China Syndrome sci-fi hogwash, however. Could what happened near the mountains of Tibet affect us here?
"That's an open question," he said. "When a big earthquake happens, we see seismicity rates rising, temporarily but quite significantly, as the surface waves from these big quakes travel around the planet." But he cited an unpublished study that indicates big earthquakes don't trigger other big earthquakes.
"The Sumatra quake lit up parts of the globe everywhere," he said. "So in that sense, it's valid to ask, Is there some kind of a physical link?" Parsons examined mega-quakes for the past 30 years, and could find no evidence that one led to another. "That doesn't say it couldn't happen," he said, "but over the last few decades it doesn't appear it has."
Popular culture has contributed to the apocalyptic quake talk. The 2004 TV movie "10.5" and "Crack in the World" from 1965 suggested the Really, Really Big One could turn the planet inside out.
"The idea comes up from time to time, but there doesn't appear to be the fault necessary to produce such an event," Parsons said. "In terms of a cataclysmic event, you really need a fault that's already in existence to break. The energy required to fracture intact rock is so great, the forces just aren't there to start a new fault all at once and cause a giant earthquake."