True and true. Oregon 1.6%, Washington 3.4%, California 6.2%, it all pales in comparison to most of the rest of the country.
The last part though, I don't get. Pointing out a demographic difference isn't pulling any kind of card, it's just connecting a reality of the industry to the two areas we're discussing. I'm not saying because of that gap in 2.8 percent (and about 150K in absolute numbers) white people in WA or black people in WA are any different from those in Oregon, it's just that the more there are the better the chances.
theres a huge gap in populous as well....
seattle metro has about 1.5 million more people then portland metro, and then you have small numbers of black people in olympia/metro, spokane/metro and even vancouver(which is a direct runoff from portland) while oregon only has a black community in portland/metro... u may find a few in college towns, but its slim pickens after that... so washington as a whole SHOULD have more black people... were comparing portland metro, 2.5+ mill, to seattle/tacoma/spokane/olympia/etc at 6.4+mill.. of course theres gonna be more...
but "the more you have the better the chances" is a fucked up comment in itself... lol... what do you feel when you see news of someone (black) being murdered? is it cool cause theres another stat to have on hand in case the "which city b blappin more niggas" thread pops up??
its not a rag on you, plus i dont know you from a cup o noodles, but are you in these black areas? like living, paying section 8 rent,
hearing the gunshots,
seeing your patnas heads spilt on the concrete,
gettin shot/grazed/barely missed,
having to shoot cats in survival,
eatin off of 300 in food stamps tryna make it stretch,
smokin and drinkin so much you forget how fucked up life is?
or do you just collect the data??
cause i dont know about you, but me and my niggas is the stat stuffers, not the score keepers... so i know first hand about the 3.4/1.6 you always bring up.... thats what i was pointing out... those numbers are real to me