WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FOUND IN IRAQ

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Ethereal

Ethereal

Sicc OG
#1
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#1
Bush told the people of America that there were WOMD in Iraq, and now we can finally rest knowing he told the truth and the U.S. military has finally uncovered these weapons. Here are just a few exclusive images (there are more) of these weapons.

They found this weapon of mass destruction under ground. It was well hidden but the U.S. military uncovered it just as they promised.


These weapons of mass destruction were found paired up with one another inside of a building. The U.S. military dismantled them before they could be detonated.


[see above]


Here is a chemical weapon the U.S. found in Iraq.


I told you fuckers there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and now you have your proof. These weapons are responsible for hundreds of thousands of cold blooded deaths. God bless America for saving so many lives by uncovering them.
 
P

PoeticBass

Fresh
#3
Jan 9, 2004
27
0
0
41
#3
newspapers are not reliable... no sources given... how can i check to make sure they're tellnig the truth... also do you think an Iraqi scientist will admit to more than he has to and get convicted on war crimes? hell no...
look at the designs... the capabilities... the plans... the money being funnelled away(everyone loves to talk about slush funds in the US military, anybody do the same i checking out Iraq's?)... and the behaviours before weapons inspectors visits...
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#5
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#5
PoeticBass said:
newspapers are not reliable... no sources given... how can i check to make sure they're tellnig the truth... also do you think an Iraqi scientist will admit to more than he has to and get convicted on war crimes? hell no...
look at the designs... the capabilities... the plans... the money being funnelled away(everyone loves to talk about slush funds in the US military, anybody do the same i checking out Iraq's?)... and the behaviours before weapons inspectors visits...
Click to expand...

lol, you say all that, but how did you acknowledge such info? the unreliable newspapers!??!...lol
 
Ethereal

Ethereal

Sicc OG
#6
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#6
PoeticBass said:
and the behaviours before weapons inspectors visits...
Click to expand...
I have yet to see a Bush hater elaborate on that. To me that says a lot about their weapons programs. It's to easy to buy time by denying weapons inspectors access, destroy the weapons, then let the U.S. come in and find nothing. It's not far fetched at all if you ask me. It's not like Saddam has done anything drastic to prove he is capable of such a thing (NEFAR559 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT I AM ABSOLUTELY JOKING/EXAGERATING WITH THIS LINE).
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#7
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#7
PoeticBass said:
and the behaviours before weapons inspectors visits...
Click to expand...
the Carnegie reported the opposite, in fact i have yet to read something on the bush administration side that dealt with that. Funny how these pro-war supporters on this forum go after the stupidest things.
 
W

WHITE DEVIL

Sicc OG
#8
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#8
Newspaper Found In Nitro The Guru's Room!

Fresno, CA: Nitro the guru denied allegations that he actually read a newspaper at a press conference last Thursday, stating "I was using it to start a fire. We have a wood stove at our house, unlike those hippy liberals who oppose the war!"

When asked if the articles provoked thought, Nitro initially responded with "no comment", but later changed his tune to "Boy that poor Charlie Brown sure has bad luck!"
 
Ethereal

Ethereal

Sicc OG
#9
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#9
nefar559 said:
the Carnegie reported the opposite, in fact i have yet to read something on the bush administration side that dealt with that. Funny how these pro-war supporters on this forum go after the stupidest things.
Click to expand...
The smallest things? With all the talk about weapons of mass destruction, you think that Saddam not cooperating with weapons inspectors is a small thing? You think that Saddam not letting inspectors in is no big deal?
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#13
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#13
Nitro the Guru said:
The smallest things? With all the talk about weapons of mass destruction, you think that Saddam not cooperating with weapons inspectors is a small thing? You think that Saddam not letting inspectors in is no big deal?
Click to expand...
not smallest, but the stupidest.

i'm not saying its no big deal, but the latest reports showed again that the UN inspections did do a good job in dismantling saddam's regime.

only on this forum do you get idoits that say, oh the scientists are acting suspicious, what were they hiding?, or SADDAM, UDAY, QUSAY are the weapons of mass destruction. laughable arguments.
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#14
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#14
Mcleanhatch said:
i post my sources 99% of the time
Click to expand...
yea, you also posted crap that linked saddam to osama and 9/11. And newsmax sources that claim Iraq had WMD, and that he was going to use them on US forces during this war.

come on now. Powell said no link was there, and as far as WMD, they were still looking.
 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#17
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#17
Quote:
Originally posted by Mcleanhatch
AND DONT RECALL EVER POSTING ANYHTING LIKE THAT. CAN YOU FIND IT???


Quote:
Originally posted by nefar559
you're crazy, you should remember the crap you post.



I DONT BECAUSE I DIDNT POST THAT. BUT SINCE YOU REMEMBER IT WHY DONT YOU LOOK FOR IT??

LET ME GUESS BECAUSE IT ISNT THERE BECAUSE I HAVENT POSTED THAT
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#18
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#18
Mcleanhatch said:
Quote:
Originally posted by Mcleanhatch
AND DONT RECALL EVER POSTING ANYHTING LIKE THAT. CAN YOU FIND IT???


Quote:
Originally posted by nefar559
you're crazy, you should remember the crap you post.



I DONT BECAUSE I DIDNT POST THAT. BUT SINCE YOU REMEMBER IT WHY DONT YOU LOOK FOR IT??

LET ME GUESS BECAUSE IT ISNT THERE BECAUSE I HAVENT POSTED THAT
Click to expand...
i read those crazy headlines of your articles
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#19
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#19
“I would remind you, that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied – finally denied access, a report came out of the atomic – the a--the—the– the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don't know what more evidence we need.”

President George W. Bush
Speaking to reporters at Camp David with British Prime Minister Tony Blair
09-07-02




“There is no such report, as far as I know.”
Former IAEA weapons inspector in Iraq, David Albright
CBS 60 Minutes
12-08-02




“The IAEA did issue a report in 1998, around the time weapons inspectors were denied access to Iraq for the final time, but the report made no such assertion. It declared: ‘Based on all credible information to date, the IAEA has found no indication of Iraq having achieved its program goal of producing nuclear weapons or of Iraq having retained a physical capability for the production of weapon-useable nuclear material or having clandestinely obtained such material.’”

The Washington Post, p. A01
“For Bush, Facts Are Malleable”
10-22-02
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom