We must strike first to protect the home land, BOMB INDIA NOW!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#1
India's test launch of new missile fails
By GAVIN RABINOWITZ, Associated Press Writer
47 minutes ago



NEW DELHI - India's first test-firing of a new missile designed to carry nuclear warheads across much of Asia and the Middle East was unsuccessful, the defense minister said. Although initially reported as a success by officials, the Agni III missile plunged into the Bay of Bengal short of its target, Defense Pranab Mukherjee told reporters late Sunday.

Following the failed missile launch, an Indian rocket carrying a satellite for TV broadcasts veered off course and exploded after takeoff Monday, Indian media reported.

The missile launch came as President Bush tries to push a civilian nuclear deal with India past a skeptical Congress. The deal permits India to keep making nuclear weapons, and critics say the pact could undermine the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

Even though the deal does not cover missiles, the Hindu newspaper reported Monday that the top U.S. general, Peter Pace, gave Indian officials the green light to conduct the test when he visited India last month. The missile test reportedly had been delayed for two years by technical issues and fears of international condemnation.

Mukherjee, who witnessed Sunday's missile launch, said India would press ahead with the Agni III program. He termed the failure a snag, but offered no other details.

Indian media reported that the missile's second stage failed to separate after it was launched from Wheeler Island off the eastern state of Orissa.

India's current crop of missiles have been largely intended to confront archrival and neighbor Pakistan. The Agni III, by contrast, is to be India's longest-range missile, designed to reach 1,900 miles. That would putting China's major cities well into range, as well as targets deep in the Middle East.

It's also said to be capable of carrying a 200-300 kiloton nuclear warhead.

"This is going to help in establishing the credibility of India's deterrent profile," said Indian defense analyst C. Uday Bhaskar.

Still, he dismissed speculation the missile was designed with China in mind.

"Any strategic capability is not aimed at any particular nation. To say it is China-specific is misleading," Bhaskar said.

India and China have shared decades of mutual suspicion and fought a 1962 border war. But relations have warmed considerably in recent years as the two Asian giants have boosted trade and economic ties.

India's missile program, together with its nuclear program and drive for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council, is part of its ongoing efforts to establish itself as a world power.

While past Indian missile test firings were seen attempts at saber-rattling with Pakistan, which would in turn test its own missiles, the Agni III test was seen as routine and intended to further India's missile program, which aims to eventually produce a long-range ICBM.

India's homegrown missile arsenal already includes the short-range Prithvi ballistic missile, the medium-range Akash, the anti-tank Nag and the supersonic Brahmos missile, developed jointly with Russia.

India notified Pakistan ahead of the launch, in accordance with an agreement between the two, said Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam. India and Pakistan have fought three wars since they gained independence from Britain in 1947.

After Monday's rocket veered off course, authorities alerted emergency crews around the launch site in southeastern India, presumably in case the debris crashed back to earth, NDTV news television station reported.

The nearly 4,800-pound satellite — named INSAT-4C — was to be India's 12th satellite in orbit.
 
#2
India, Pakistan and Isreal is where the US shows its' hypcropisy on its stance on WMD/Nuclear weapons programs. When India tested its first nukes in '98, the US was caught off guard and did nothing about it. When Pakistan got its' nuclear program established using mainly black market materials the US had no problem with it. When it was revealed Isreal had established its own nuclear program on the sly in the mid-late '80's the US had no problem with it. All three have yet to sign the nuclear non-proliferation agreement, yet the US seems to have issues with Iran's use of nuclear technology to generate power (which can't be used to create weapons and is 100% allowable under the NNPT) and N. Korea which is more of a legit threat. N. Korea won't escalate into anything anytime soon. With a million man army and China and Russia who will come to their defense the US won't take military action anytime soon. Ditto with Iran. Russia and China have pledged to back up Iran miltarily if the US takes any military action. So if you do here of the US invading/striking Iran, its time to pack up and head for the hills as WWIII is on its way.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,446
494
83
#3
The US position stems from the idea that since India, Pakistan and Israel are not members of the NPT they need not abide to the rules outlined in the NPT. Also the NPT allows members to withdrawl if they feel threatened or for defense reasons. No matter how much pressure the US puts on Israel it is Israel's desicion to disarm their nuclear weaponry and given the series of wars with nearly all Israel's neighbors and the constant call by Iran and jihadists to ahniliate Israel would be very reluctant to do so. The US position regarding India is that India is a democracy and also good standing in the international community. It should also be noted that India is the second largest nation on Earth and is a strategic ally. The nuclear deal reached with India is supposed to result in India joining the NPT but also leaving several sites undeclared and unopened to IAEA inspections. To be fair, I think the US DID have a problem when both Pakistan and India tested their nuclear weaponry.

Eternal Designs: could you point me in the direction of any information regarding military pacts between Russia and China with Iran?
 
#5
Y-Soulja said:
Damn, north korea and now this........seems like erryone is trying to be prepared for some nuclear war
you gotta look at at from the flip...if you were a country say in middle asia or s. america and you saw what the US has done in the last 5-6 years would you sit back and be content to be possibly invaded/sanctioned or would you arm yourself "just in case" or as maybe a deterent to invasion?
 
Jul 4, 2002
714
1
0
45
#7
I thank god for every person in the army/navy etc. I do not want to be a part of, or see war. As selfish as it may sound, I just want to be with my babies, and would not go unless I was drafted or sum shit..