WATCH AS THE FILTHY AMERICANS KILL A DYING IRAQI!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 2, 2002
8,185
238
63
40
#2
too bad the military cant do anything wrong in the medias eyes.
ITs like a taboo to critisize the military
 
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#4
Yes this is liberation, this is killing a enemy insurgent, i would be disgusted in this marine's actions if the insurgents were following the ROE and the GC. However i dont think that the Geneva convention permitted the beheading of CIVILIAN NON COMBATANTS as well as EPW's. I think Abu Garab was wrong since those were defencless EPWs but this man, fuck it one less that we have to worry about feeding in Gitmo.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#6
KleanKut said:
Yes this is liberation, this is killing a enemy insurgent, i would be disgusted in this marine's actions if the insurgents were following the ROE and the GC. However i dont think that the Geneva convention permitted the beheading of CIVILIAN NON COMBATANTS as well as EPW's. I think Abu Garab was wrong since those were defencless EPWs but this man, fuck it one less that we have to worry about feeding in Gitmo.
When this war first started and the iraqis showed pictures of americans what happened? They cried and had a fit over the pics being shown. Are these "insurgents" different from the people who fought americans when america first invaded?
 
Jan 2, 2003
1,439
6
0
#7
im cool off that said:
too bad the military cant do anything wrong in the medias eyes.
ITs like a taboo to critisize the military
i feel u 1000% percent on that one....

u know what...its bush rhetoric....if u do criticize ur "unpatriotic" or "dont supprt freedom".....LOL...or maybe u support the "evil-doers"(BAHHH!!!)

ill say it again...BUSH has raped english and consistently uses the stupidest fucking words
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#8
HERESY said:
This is liberation.
Who are you to say it's not? And what do you know about that Iraqi? Do you know who he was or what he did? Maybe he killed 5 marines right before he was sent to his grave.

If you were at WAR (God knows you never will be) and your enemy was wounded are you going to press on or finish him off? Decisions like that can determine whether or not you ever see your family again. Something to think about.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#9
Who are you to say it's not?


Who are you to say it is liberation? Who is klean kut that he should go and "liberate" people?


And what do you know about that Iraqi? Do you know who he was or what he did? Maybe he killed 5 marines right before he was sent to his grave. It does not justify him being killed while he was down nitro. Did you hit the link and READ the responses? Most of the people said the killing VIOLATED a "law". Maybe you should read it.

If you were at WAR (God knows you never will be) and your enemy was wounded are you going to press on or finish him off?


It depends man. I wouldn't kill him and laugh at him. I wouldn't cheer and party and wish to do it again.


Decisions like that can determine whether or not you ever see your family again. Something to think about.



I agree. NEVER LEAVE AN ENEMY BEHIND OR HE WILL RISE AGAIN......I hear you but the thing is was this man going to rise again? Did the filthy americans violate laws by killing him? IMHO they did.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#10
HERESY said:
Who are you to say it is liberation? Who is klean kut that he should go and "liberate" people?.
I can not rightly say it is, because I don't understant the situation. He could have been carrying home groceries. He could have thrown a grenade into a Marine lunch room. I just don't know.

HERESY said:
It does not justify him being killed while he was down nitro. Did you hit the link and READ the responses? Most of the people said the killing VIOLATED a "law". Maybe you should read it.
Most of the people don't understand what or how it went down. They see a person out of military uniform, with no visible weapon. Therefore a law is broken. But what can you really see?

HERESY said:
It depends man. I wouldn't kill him and laugh at him. I wouldn't cheer and party and wish to do it again.
Got'cha. Neither would I. If there is any proof as to the morality of this mans death, it can be found in the way that retard redneck talked about it.

HERESY said:
I agree. NEVER LEAVE AN ENEMY BEHIND OR HE WILL RISE AGAIN......I hear you but the thing is was this man going to rise again? Did the filthy americans violate laws by killing him? IMHO they did.
Maybe the guy was armed and we couldn't see the weapon. This is why I don't like to post articles or videos because it is all opinionated bullshit based on what can be seen (through edited records) and not so much on causality.
 
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#11
This video was even taken out of context. This is the same clip on Farinhite 9/11. however. If you watch the whole thing the marine was like When you are up there shooting blah blah blah HELL YEAH LETS DO IT AGAIN!....but he goes on to say when you go down there and see the end results of your actions you are like........damn look what we just did (talking about when he sees the bullet riddled corpse of the life he just took). this guy in our unit showed it too us i will see if i can get it up here.

Heresy, yes the insurgents are diffrent then the SOLDIERS we first fought coming in the inital invasion. They were a uniformed army who followed the Rules of engadement and somewhat the GC. Or else jessica lynch would have been beheaded on al jazeira. However most of these "freedom fighter" insurgents are from Jordan, Syria, Iran and Saudi. Mor Jordan and Syria then other nations. They are hardcore islamic extreamests. Most of the insurgents we have captured have been from nations other then Iraq. I have talked to some ING and IP's and they were actualy part of saddams old army. They were jsut soldiers doing their duty and following orders. Now they are still soldiers and police officers following a diffrent set of orders.
 
Feb 10, 2004
155
0
0
#14
KleanKut said:
However i dont think that the Geneva convention permitted the beheading of CIVILIAN NON COMBATANTS as well as EPW's. I think Abu Garab was wrong since those were defencless EPWs but this man, fuck it one less that we have to worry about feeding in Gitmo.
shut the fuck up,yu only good for typing bullshit comments and suckin uncle sam´s nuts.
if america doesnt respect the geneva accords(torture "suspected terrorist",not following ROE) ,why should the insurgents respect them,only cause they are white?