USC VS MICHIGAN AT THE ROSE BOWL
- Thread starter WiCkEd
- Start date
bias???? what the fuck are you talking about? how can those computers be biast? maybe they are biast since your conference was fuckin horrible this year and that USC didnt play anyone good, you ever think about that? I knew it was coming, last year the writers and coaches were biast against yall in the AP and Coaches poll, now they ranked yall number 1 and now the computers are biast....hmmmm....having the 40th schedule strength in the nation must be biast also
I'm not saying yall dont deserve to be there because I do, but you using the word biast is totally off, no biast against the Pac 10, punishing the Pac 10 for being very down this year and USC not playing but 1 ranked team.
I'm not saying yall dont deserve to be there because I do, but you using the word biast is totally off, no biast against the Pac 10, punishing the Pac 10 for being very down this year and USC not playing but 1 ranked team.
GRIM,understand that are schedule strength goes down,because our own conference beats each other,but we have no problem beating the MICHIGANS and Auburns.Our tough conference hurts us instead of having 1 big chief (oklahoma) playing 7 little chiefs (BAYLOR,IOWA ST,TEXAS AM,KANSAS,MISSOURI,TEXAS TECH,COLO)
Those are where you pad your stats,so when an OKLAHOMA beats a TEXAS....who beat all them weak teams to pad there record (ARKANSAS BLEW'EM OUT)It makes them look good.
Those are where you pad your stats,so when an OKLAHOMA beats a TEXAS....who beat all them weak teams to pad there record (ARKANSAS BLEW'EM OUT)It makes them look good.
dont know any off top, dont recall any big wins, dont recall any really big games to tell you the truth, if you are counting wins against teams like Auburn im sure there are tons of them, but I promise you, that Michigan is damn near probably the only ranked team that will be ranked at the end of the year that someone from your conference has beaten
exactly, where is your conference champ game? alot of times your conference doesnt even have a true champion....OU put themselves in a position where that game didnt even matter, sucks to be them huh....LSU used the game to jump USC.....ACC will have championship game next year and it might benefit or hurt the champion of that conference, I know you said "bullshit conference championships" so I take it you are not for them? I think they are fair only if all the major conferences have them, if not, they dont really serve a purpose, especially in like the SEC this year when the 2 teams have already played each other...in the Big 12 the teams hadnt played each other so I didnt mind it but usually the teams have already played each other and it penalizes a team like LSU because they have to beat a team twice which is hard
BIG GAMES-BIG LOSSES
TEXAS A&M-VIRGINIA TECH /LOSS 19-35
COLORADO -WASH ST. /LOSS 26-47
TEXAS-ARKANSAS /LOSS 28-38
TEXAS TECH-NC STATE /LOSS 21-49
COLORADO-FLORIDA ST /LOSS 7-47
TEXAS A&M-PITTSBURGH /LOSS 26-37
TEXAS TECH-MISSISSIPPI /WIN 49-45
IOWAS ST-IOWA /LOSS 21-40
BIG GAMES AGAINST TOP 25 TEAMS FROM OTHER CONFERENCES.
1-7 RECORD AN AVERAGE SCORE OF 42-24....YIKES.Lucky you have gimme conference games.
TEXAS A&M-VIRGINIA TECH /LOSS 19-35
COLORADO -WASH ST. /LOSS 26-47
TEXAS-ARKANSAS /LOSS 28-38
TEXAS TECH-NC STATE /LOSS 21-49
COLORADO-FLORIDA ST /LOSS 7-47
TEXAS A&M-PITTSBURGH /LOSS 26-37
TEXAS TECH-MISSISSIPPI /WIN 49-45
IOWAS ST-IOWA /LOSS 21-40
BIG GAMES AGAINST TOP 25 TEAMS FROM OTHER CONFERENCES.
1-7 RECORD AN AVERAGE SCORE OF 42-24....YIKES.Lucky you have gimme conference games.
And you have a true Champion...lol
K-State is your champion,but they lost to Texas who has a better overall record,and a higher ranking. You have your second place team playing for a National Championship,and has a higher ranking aswell?HAHAHAHA
Overall,your Champion has 2 teams in their own conference with better overall records,and higher rankings.Peep how you did non-conference..
K-State is your champion,but they lost to Texas who has a better overall record,and a higher ranking. You have your second place team playing for a National Championship,and has a higher ranking aswell?HAHAHAHA
Overall,your Champion has 2 teams in their own conference with better overall records,and higher rankings.Peep how you did non-conference..
well obviously our conference came out on top of the shit, got 2 teams in the BCS, Texas was actually slated to get in the BCS but since K-State won they got one instead....and where is your conference? on the outside looking in, sorry Bam Bam, better luck next year....ohh yeah, please dont disappear after bowl season when all the head to head match up's happen, its happened the last 2 years, never hear from you after them, can you promise me you will make an appearance or are you going to pull another whodini? I am here come win or loss, dont matter to me, I can take a loss, shit i even give yall your props when you deserve it, I think USC should play LSU, dont think im unreasonable
and that might have something to do with it, I aint saying its good for the Big 12 of gotten beaten by that many other non con teams (even though it was pretty shitty big 12 schools that had lost, I believe mainly the bottom half of our teams besides Texas) I think that is what built schedule strength and other computer factors for the Big 12....I dont know enough about what goes into those computers but it must have something to do about that and I really think the Pac 10 will have to do something about it scheduling wise or adding some teams to their conference or they will keep getting left out.....I am all for trying to see dope ass football games, would love to see the Pac 10 become a really tight conference, just makes college football even better....what do you think they can do to "stop getting fucked over"?