--is this a noble effort by the US to help Lebanon defends itself or a dispicable way to promote war??--
WASHINGTON - The United States plans to help train and equip the Lebanese army so it can take control of all of the nation’s territory when warfare between Israel and Hezbollah eases, the State Department said Thursday.
The program was approved by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to take effect “once we have conditions on the ground permitting,” spokesman Sean McCormack said.
McCormack provided no details on what equipment the United States might provide, the training that would be conducted, how many U.S. personnel would be involved, or possible costs.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement
Other nations will help out, too, McCormack said, as American diplomats consulted with French and other officials on a U.N. resolution for a cease-fire in Lebanon.
“We feel pretty optimistic that there’s going to be something” worked out on a resolution at the end of the week or early next week, White House spokesman Tony Snow said.
‘A significant upgrade’
Gen. John Abizaid, who heads the U.S. Central Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday the Lebanese armed force “needs a significant upgrade of equipment and training capability that I believe the Western nations, particularly the United States, can assist with.”
Before the war, command officials visited the Lebanese armed forces for an assessment, Abizaid said, and “we saw that they needed some significant spare parts” and other help.
On prospects for ending the fighting, he said “it will never work for Lebanon if, over time, Hezbollah has a greater military capacity than the Lebanese armed forces.”
Abizaid also said he believes Lebanon can extend government control over the entire country if it gets sufficient help, including an international peacekeeping force with a clear mandate, cooperation from the Lebanese government and “robust rules of engagement.”
Asked what he meant by “robust rules of engagement,” Abizaid said the commander of the peacekeeping force must be able to use “all available means at his forces’ disposal. And I think, in the case of southern Lebanon, it’ll have to have capabilities that are just not minor, small arms, but would include all arms.”
Diplomatic resolution in the works
Rice, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns and Assistant Secretary David Welch are working with other governments, mostly by telephone, to put together a resolution “that stands up,” McCormack said.
This would include disarming Hezbollah, already ordered by the Security Council in 2004, and establishing an international peacekeeping force to move into southern Lebanon.
Click for related content
* Israel prepares for 18-mile push into Lebanon
* Hezbollah leader threatens to attack Tel Aviv
* Iran leader: Israel's destruction will bring peace
Nations that would contribute troops are expected to meet next week at the U.N. A meeting was postponed on Monday and again on Thursday.
Rice plans to spend the weekend at President Bush’s ranch in Texas and will be “working the phones from Crawford,” McCormack said.
“There’s still some diplomacy that needs to be done,” he said,
Bush has said he does not envision having American ground troops in a peacekeeping force, but the U.S. could contribute communications, logistics and other support.
The administration is striving for a resolution that would end the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, now in its fourth week, and also establish conditions for a lasting cease-fire. Many other countries favor an immediate cease-fire.
The military training would be designed to help the Lebanese armed forces “exercise control and sovereignty over all of Lebanese territory once we have an end to the fighting in such a way that is durable,” McCormack said.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement
U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown said Wednesday night the Americans and French were working on a two-stage process: An initial resolution would focus on a cease-fire and broad political principles for a settlement, and a second resolution would deal with an international peacekeeping force, border security and other long-term issues.
“Doing it in at least two resolutions, if not more, creates much more manageable, bite-sized ways of moving the diplomacy forward and allowing you to stop the fighting at the start, rather than waiting until the end of a torturous, complex, long diplomatic process,” Malloch Brown said on PBS’s “The Newshour with Jim Lehrer.”
Conditions for cease-fire
France circulated an initial resolution Saturday and the new draft again expresses “utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel.”
It also details conditions needed for a cease-fire, including:
* Strict respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Israel and Lebanon.
* Release of the two captured Israeli soldiers that sparked the fighting.
* Disarmament of all militias in Lebanon and the deployment of the Lebanese army throughout southern Lebanon, which is now controlled by Hezbollah.
* Marking the international borders of Lebanon, including the disputed Chebaa farms area, which Israel seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.
* Establishing a buffer zone from the border to Lebanon’s Litani River. Only Lebanese security forces and U.N.-mandated international forces would be allowed in the buffer zone.
* Settlement of “the issue of the Lebanese prisoners detained in Israel.”
Israeli leaders have said they want to continue fighting for 10 days to two weeks to seriously diminish Hezbollah’s military capability. Hezbollah’s chief spokesman said Thursday the militia will not agree to a cease-fire until all Israeli troops leave Lebanon.
Differences in approach
Since fighting began July 12, the Security Council has not taken any action to stop it, primarily because of opposition from the United States, Israel’s closest ally. The U.S. opposes a cessation of hostilities without simultaneous steps to deploy peacekeepers and disarm Hezbollah.
France, which could lead the proposed peacekeeping force, has insisted fighting be halted first to pave the way for a wider peace, a stand with wide international support.
Bolton said Wednesday that “there are differences in approach to the nature of the cessation of hostilities, and how to make them permanent, but there is near complete agreement on the fundamental framework that has to be put in place.”
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
WASHINGTON - The United States plans to help train and equip the Lebanese army so it can take control of all of the nation’s territory when warfare between Israel and Hezbollah eases, the State Department said Thursday.
The program was approved by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to take effect “once we have conditions on the ground permitting,” spokesman Sean McCormack said.
McCormack provided no details on what equipment the United States might provide, the training that would be conducted, how many U.S. personnel would be involved, or possible costs.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement
Other nations will help out, too, McCormack said, as American diplomats consulted with French and other officials on a U.N. resolution for a cease-fire in Lebanon.
“We feel pretty optimistic that there’s going to be something” worked out on a resolution at the end of the week or early next week, White House spokesman Tony Snow said.
‘A significant upgrade’
Gen. John Abizaid, who heads the U.S. Central Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday the Lebanese armed force “needs a significant upgrade of equipment and training capability that I believe the Western nations, particularly the United States, can assist with.”
Before the war, command officials visited the Lebanese armed forces for an assessment, Abizaid said, and “we saw that they needed some significant spare parts” and other help.
On prospects for ending the fighting, he said “it will never work for Lebanon if, over time, Hezbollah has a greater military capacity than the Lebanese armed forces.”
Abizaid also said he believes Lebanon can extend government control over the entire country if it gets sufficient help, including an international peacekeeping force with a clear mandate, cooperation from the Lebanese government and “robust rules of engagement.”
Asked what he meant by “robust rules of engagement,” Abizaid said the commander of the peacekeeping force must be able to use “all available means at his forces’ disposal. And I think, in the case of southern Lebanon, it’ll have to have capabilities that are just not minor, small arms, but would include all arms.”
Diplomatic resolution in the works
Rice, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns and Assistant Secretary David Welch are working with other governments, mostly by telephone, to put together a resolution “that stands up,” McCormack said.
This would include disarming Hezbollah, already ordered by the Security Council in 2004, and establishing an international peacekeeping force to move into southern Lebanon.
Click for related content
* Israel prepares for 18-mile push into Lebanon
* Hezbollah leader threatens to attack Tel Aviv
* Iran leader: Israel's destruction will bring peace
Nations that would contribute troops are expected to meet next week at the U.N. A meeting was postponed on Monday and again on Thursday.
Rice plans to spend the weekend at President Bush’s ranch in Texas and will be “working the phones from Crawford,” McCormack said.
“There’s still some diplomacy that needs to be done,” he said,
Bush has said he does not envision having American ground troops in a peacekeeping force, but the U.S. could contribute communications, logistics and other support.
The administration is striving for a resolution that would end the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, now in its fourth week, and also establish conditions for a lasting cease-fire. Many other countries favor an immediate cease-fire.
The military training would be designed to help the Lebanese armed forces “exercise control and sovereignty over all of Lebanese territory once we have an end to the fighting in such a way that is durable,” McCormack said.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement
U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown said Wednesday night the Americans and French were working on a two-stage process: An initial resolution would focus on a cease-fire and broad political principles for a settlement, and a second resolution would deal with an international peacekeeping force, border security and other long-term issues.
“Doing it in at least two resolutions, if not more, creates much more manageable, bite-sized ways of moving the diplomacy forward and allowing you to stop the fighting at the start, rather than waiting until the end of a torturous, complex, long diplomatic process,” Malloch Brown said on PBS’s “The Newshour with Jim Lehrer.”
Conditions for cease-fire
France circulated an initial resolution Saturday and the new draft again expresses “utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel.”
It also details conditions needed for a cease-fire, including:
* Strict respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Israel and Lebanon.
* Release of the two captured Israeli soldiers that sparked the fighting.
* Disarmament of all militias in Lebanon and the deployment of the Lebanese army throughout southern Lebanon, which is now controlled by Hezbollah.
* Marking the international borders of Lebanon, including the disputed Chebaa farms area, which Israel seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.
* Establishing a buffer zone from the border to Lebanon’s Litani River. Only Lebanese security forces and U.N.-mandated international forces would be allowed in the buffer zone.
* Settlement of “the issue of the Lebanese prisoners detained in Israel.”
Israeli leaders have said they want to continue fighting for 10 days to two weeks to seriously diminish Hezbollah’s military capability. Hezbollah’s chief spokesman said Thursday the militia will not agree to a cease-fire until all Israeli troops leave Lebanon.
Differences in approach
Since fighting began July 12, the Security Council has not taken any action to stop it, primarily because of opposition from the United States, Israel’s closest ally. The U.S. opposes a cessation of hostilities without simultaneous steps to deploy peacekeepers and disarm Hezbollah.
France, which could lead the proposed peacekeeping force, has insisted fighting be halted first to pave the way for a wider peace, a stand with wide international support.
Bolton said Wednesday that “there are differences in approach to the nature of the cessation of hostilities, and how to make them permanent, but there is near complete agreement on the fundamental framework that has to be put in place.”
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
