US peace marches draw thousands
- Thread starter nefar559
- Start date
in the USA there will always be peace marches
but there are never war rally marches
so its kinda hard to gauge. i mean you can have 10,000 supporters show up and you see it on TV and say damn thats alote of people but what about the 300 million people at home that are mostly for the war. that why i dont listen to peace marches unless you start getting MILLIONS in every state marching
but there are never war rally marches
so its kinda hard to gauge. i mean you can have 10,000 supporters show up and you see it on TV and say damn thats alote of people but what about the 300 million people at home that are mostly for the war. that why i dont listen to peace marches unless you start getting MILLIONS in every state marching
i read the first link and it was obvious that it was written by a liberal left winger as they spoke of hollywood stars like susan serandon (which is as close to radical liberal as one could get), another democratic leader, and jesse jackson (who's beliefs have no weight with me). i mean there was no conservative representation whatsoever.
also im kinda surprised that ONLY 5,000 people showed up for the rally in SF (probly the most liberal city in the universe).
and the second link to the NYtimes said i had to registar so i didnt even read it. but it would probly be the same being that the NYTimes is one of the most liberal newspapers in the country.
also im kinda surprised that ONLY 5,000 people showed up for the rally in SF (probly the most liberal city in the universe).
and the second link to the NYtimes said i had to registar so i didnt even read it. but it would probly be the same being that the NYTimes is one of the most liberal newspapers in the country.
1st question>>> i explained earlier i didnt say the paper was left wing i said the journalist SOUNDED left wing because he only got reaction from people on the left (serandon, jackson, hollywood stars, democratic representative) and didnt get reaction from the middle or the right into the article.
2nd question>>> look at all the stuff she fights for, also heard that shit on Hannity and Colmes and on The O'Reilly Factor
3rd question>>> you misquoted me i didnt say THE MOST i said ONE OF THE MOST. and i heard that on Hannity ond Colmes from Sean Hannity
2nd question>>> look at all the stuff she fights for, also heard that shit on Hannity and Colmes and on The O'Reilly Factor
3rd question>>> you misquoted me i didnt say THE MOST i said ONE OF THE MOST. and i heard that on Hannity ond Colmes from Sean Hannity
the bbc articles states:
"The protests took place as US Secretary of State Colin Powell said the protracted negotiations at the UN over the adoption of a resolution on Iraq must move forward; the organisation was entering a key week and could not continue to hold a never-ending debate. "
and
"Mr Bush on Saturday reiterated his vow that the US would use force against Iraq if Saddam Hussein did not disarm, whether or not the UN supported such action.
"If the UN won't act, if Saddam Hussein won't disarm, we will lead a coalition to disarm him," he said."
so the gathering was a reaction from the people who have a
reason not to go to war
what would have a right winger said? you heard that shit all
the time coming from the white house....why do you want that
repeated in the article? all those people are against it
so what if they bbc article was "left wing" has you claim, doesn't that mean don't listen to them?
"hollywood stars, democratic representative" leftist? lol
in april when hugo chavez was overthrown, the nytimes quickly
reported that he resign his presidencical...which was not true and not fair in reporting...major newspaper in the US quickly began saying that he resign...they should have knowned better, where the indenpentant media reported the truth...doesn't that sound like a liberal paper to you??
and don't come at me with you fox said so...am not buying your
sources...you never back anything you say its just your lame
opinion.
__________________
FUCK BUSH!
Mcleanhatch
here another example of unfair reporting practice..not just the nytimes, but all of the US media.
http://www.fair.org/activism/china-response2.html
i never saw that O'Reilly show...but it seems like crap
http://www.fair.org/extra/0108/oreilly.html
http://www.fair.org/media-outlets/o'reilly.html
and as for the whole fox news channel, it sounds like crap
http://www.fair.org/extra/0108/fox-main.html
so then your sources are crap...if you can't come up with
better ones other than your opinion, i'm not wasting my time on you.
here another example of unfair reporting practice..not just the nytimes, but all of the US media.
http://www.fair.org/activism/china-response2.html
i never saw that O'Reilly show...but it seems like crap
http://www.fair.org/extra/0108/oreilly.html
http://www.fair.org/media-outlets/o'reilly.html
and as for the whole fox news channel, it sounds like crap
http://www.fair.org/extra/0108/fox-main.html
so then your sources are crap...if you can't come up with
better ones other than your opinion, i'm not wasting my time on you.
san francisco march:
"Police estimated the throng at 42,000, while protesters said more than 80, 000 people joined the 11 a.m. march,"
source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/10/27/MN28617.DTL
"The San Francisco rally drew an estimated 42,000 demonstrators in front of the newly gilded City Hall."
source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-antiwar27oct27.story
"Police estimated the throng at 42,000, while protesters said more than 80, 000 people joined the 11 a.m. march,"
source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/10/27/MN28617.DTL
"The San Francisco rally drew an estimated 42,000 demonstrators in front of the newly gilded City Hall."
source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-antiwar27oct27.story
well the fox news chanel is "fair and balanced" their anchors are Liberal>>>geraldo rivera, greta van sustren, alan colmes
Conservative>>>sean hannity, brit hume, and
Indepentant>>> bill O'Reilly
so you know you getting both sides as opposed to other sources such as CNN where if your a known conservative there is no way in hell that you will get hired by ted turner.
Conservative>>>sean hannity, brit hume, and
Indepentant>>> bill O'Reilly
so you know you getting both sides as opposed to other sources such as CNN where if your a known conservative there is no way in hell that you will get hired by ted turner.
those are unfair reviews. OReilly was bashing on both AShcroft and bush for nearly 1 month everyday for not disclosing reports on Enron, he bashed on Govoner Pataki (although i dont remember if hes dem. or rep. but i believe he beat gov Cuomo in NY so i think he is a republican. If i am wrong im sure you will let me know) for about 4 months on a daily basis for stalling on disbursement of the 1.3 billion dollars people gave to the victims of 9-11 fund (red cross, united way). of course he has a great dislike for hillary clinton and jesse jackson but well they arent saints. only way to find the ruth is to watch for yourself dont go by what other people say.
just try it its on channel 360 on DirecTV> watch Hannity and Colmes, and O'Reilly your in fresno right? so they are on at
5:00 O'Reilly and
6:00 Hannity and COlmes
just try it its on channel 360 on DirecTV> watch Hannity and Colmes, and O'Reilly your in fresno right? so they are on at
5:00 O'Reilly and
6:00 Hannity and COlmes