Underaged? Take a pic of yourself? Get arrested for felony child porn!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#1
US teen cuffed for sending nude phone pics

By Dan Goodin in San Francisco • Get more from this author

Posted in Crime, 8th October 2008 23:39 GMT

A 15-year-old Ohio girl was arrested on felony child pornography charges for allegedly sending nude cell phone pictures of herself to classmates. Authorities are considering charging some of the students who received the photos as well.

The unnamed student from Licking Valley High School in Newark, Ohio was arrested Friday after school officials discovered the materials and notified police. She spent the weekend in juvenile detention and entered a plea of "deny" on Monday, according to The NewarkAdvocate.com.

Charges include illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possession of criminal tools. If convicted, the girl could be forced to register as a sexual offender for 20 years, but because of her age, the judge hearing the case has some flexibility in the matter, an official told the Advocate.

The pictures came to light after a Licking County prosecutor began visiting high schools to educate students on the consequences of transmitting nude photos by cell phone. According to one student interviewed by 10TV News, the teens were warned they could serve 20 years if convicted.

A student later notified an adult of the nude cell phone pictures, and the adult in turn contacted school officials. School officials had pulled the girl aside and warned her about the behavior immediately after the presentation, according to a separate article by the Advocate.

This isn't the first case in which zealous American prosecutors have used child pornography statutes to protect vulnerable juveniles from themselves. In 2004, a 16-year-old girl and her 17-year-old boyfriend took pictures of themselves while naked and engaged in unspecified "sexual behavior." They didn't show the pictures to anyone, but they did send them to the boy's email address.

Eventually each was charged with producing, directing, or promoting a photograph featuring the sexual conduct of a child. The boy was also charged with an extra count of possession of child pornography. As CNET News reported here, the girl's conviction was upheld last year on appeal.

Licking County prosecutors say they have received some 20 cases involving questionable cell phone pictures. They say investigators are trying to determine how many juveniles received nude photos of the girl and have left open the possibility that others will be charged in the incident.

The girl, who is a foster child, remains under house arrest. She is not allowed to have access to a cell phone or the internet except for school purposes and then only with adult supervision.
 

Sydal

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#6
This is about as dumb as people who call the police because the neighbor is walking around the house naked. HEY, the dude is in his house naked, if you don't like that, stop lookin' through his fuckin' window.
 
Feb 8, 2003
22,839
1,850
0
#10

If convicted, the girl could be forced to register as a sexual offender for 20 years,





Now thats some bullshit. Why dont they arrest the lil underage bitches around the country that lied to grown men about they ages and got them caught up instead of this female who was just fucking with people her age. Also shouldnt teh school official who found teh pics be in trouble too for looking at them if they trying to get other kids taht seen them.
 

Sydal

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#15
that would make the ol trip to the grocery store a lot more intersting...
Hey, a lot of people still have the no shirt, no service policy. LMAO! Seriously though. Is this the only country where people see Tits as something sexual, making it illegal to expose them in public? Yea, tits are definitely nice and help a dude want to fuck, but that's not why they're there...lol.

All I'm saying is, it shouldn't be illegal to expose tits if that's what the owner wants to do.
 

DubbC415

Mickey Fallon
Sep 10, 2002
22,620
6,984
0
38
Tomato Alley
#16
^^^not that i totally disagree, but by your definition, then any body part is not "sexual." By that thinking, everyone could walk around naked. But i think it has less to do with the tits part and more to do with the age.
 

Sydal

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#17
^^^not that i totally disagree, but by your definition, then any body part is not "sexual." By that thinking, everyone could walk around naked. But i think it has less to do with the tits part and more to do with the age.
But dicks and pussies were created for that purpose. It wasn't taboo at the beginning, but we kinda strayed away from that mentality and developed, or became more "civilized" as some would say. We're getting better about it now...which is weird because in the age of political correctness, people talk about the shit way more...and there's more shit being shown on the screen.

About the age thing, I was just speaking in general. Of course it'd be all bad for a grown person to be taking the pics or looking at the pics...but when I was 15, I wanted to see some damn 15 year old tities, lol. It's not right for somebody our age to look at it, but to be a sex offender over a pic that she took herself...that was probably a pic of tits? Tits aren't that serious, lol.

DISCLAIMER: My opinion is not a disrespect to Shea. Shea believes tits are the best of all God's creations, and I respect that. LMMFAO!
 
Apr 26, 2006
4,496
3
0
38
#18
Fuck the law. Stubborn ass motherfuckers. Whatever happened to "The Spirit of the Law?" Just because it's written as law doesn't mean it's a morally correct thing to follow literally.