UK students march after tuition hikes, americans do nothing

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
This follows 40,000 Irish protesters after rises in tuition fees. Meanwhile, California’s public universities increase 15% no protests...



UK students march against cuts, occupy Conservative Party HQ



A march of more than 50,000 students and academics in London yesterday against the Conservative-Liberal Democratic coalition government’s education cuts ended in the occupation of the Tory Party’s headquarters and confrontations with riot police.



The march’s size massively exceeded expectations of the National Union of Students (NUS) and the University and College Union (UCU), who jointly called it, assembling students from almost every university and college in Britain. It was dominated by home-made banners denouncing the government. City workers and tourists clapped their hands in support.



The Conservative’s Millbank headquarters near to the Houses of Parliament was broken into and occupied. A group barged into the lobby of Millbank before being forced out by police and security officers. They then began setting fire to placards outside the entrance. Windows in the office block were smashed and a number of smoke bombs thrown. More students then invaded the building, while hundreds more outside cheered them on and chanted “Tory scum”.

An action undertaken initially by a few individuals quickly became the focus of the pent-up anger of thousands of students, who face the prospect of a mountain of debt when they finish their studies, and a future of dead-end jobs. The government plans to increase tuition fees to up to £9,000 a year, which will make England and Wales the most expensive places in the world to study at a public university.



The government has also announced that the teaching budget for universities will be cut from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion by 2014―part of a package of cuts that will see state funding of universities almost entirely replaced by charges on students. Some universities will lose all their funding for teaching, especially those specializing in subjects such as information technology, social studies and the arts.

In London, 10 of the most prestigious universities could see their funding wiped out, including the London School of Economics, the Royal Academy of Music, the School of Oriental and African Studies, the Institute of Education, the Central School for Speech and Drama and the Courtauld Institute of Art. Nearly eight in ten young people will be put off university if annual fees are raised to £10,000, according to a study by the NUS.



Riot police were ordered in to the Millbank Tower to end the occupation, but initially scattered in disarray down side streets, prompting the Metropolitan Police commissioner to admit it was an “embarrassment” for his force. The Metropolitan Police say that 32 arrests were made and there are numerous reports of police violence, with film footage on social networking sites of students being hit indiscriminately with batons and riot shields.

The students’ action was an implicit rebuff to the pathetic strategy of “influencing” the coalition government being promoted by the NUS and UCU, focusing on demands for Liberal Democrat MPs to be “recalled” for failing to honour their election pledge to oppose a rise in tuition fees. A procedure to recall MPs does not even exist.

The establishment of such a procedure is only another worthless pre-election promise by the Lib-Dems. It is unlikely to come into being for several years under any circumstances and would be directed only at MPs guilty of “serious wrongdoing”―hardly likely to affect an MP carrying out government policy!

Inside parliament, Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, speaking for the government in Prime Minister David Cameron’s absence, made clear that the cuts would go ahead, while Labour attempted to score a few points that commit the party to nothing whatsoever.

The NUS immediately denounced the occupation as “disgraceful” and as the work of a small minority of “troublemakers”. NUS president Aaron Porter told reporters that some people―“perhaps anarchists”―had “deliberately come to hijack the event”. The NUS web site led that night with a statement condemning “the violent actions of ‘rogue protesters’ who have undermined an otherwise peaceful protest”. The NUS even indicated it may not call further demonstrations and will confine itself to a “chasing down” Lib-Dem MPs who “break their promise”.

Patrick Smith, a journalism student at City University, repudiated these claims in the Guardian, insisting, “This was the action of students radicalised by cuts … today students smashed their way into the Tory party campaign HQ in a show of anger against a political elite they believe have abandoned them.”

“This kind of radical action shows that some students are disillusioned with the National Union of Students protest and lobby model,” he added. “There has been a significant segment of the student movement that has been pushing for more drastic action for a while. What has changed is that that segment has swelled to include a much wider section of the student community.”

The explosion of anger outside Tory party HQ is the first time any section of workers and youth has had a genuine opportunity to express their real feelings towards the government’s austerity measures, under conditions where the trade unions have systematically demobilised all opposition and sold out strikes.

It follows last week’s protest by 40,000 Irish students against rises in tuition fees, which was also viciously attacked by police using batons, dogs and horses, after students occupied the Ministry of Finance, and mass protests against austerity in France, Greece and Portugal.

These events testify to the extraordinary volatility of political and social relations in Britain, made all the more so by the absence of any outlet for rising tensions within the official party structures and trade unions. These tensions will, however, continue to assume ever-more explosive forms. They will inevitably find political expression―through the development of a mass movement against the government that must take the form of a political rebellion against rotten organisations such as the NUS.
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,657
0
45
Rich City
#8
the bay area has had several strikes & protests & whatnot about the tuition increases. I was actually called in for jury duty cuz 2 Cal students were arrested for assaulting a police officer from the protests.
 

R

Sicc OG
Dec 7, 2005
7,629
1,807
113
34
#14
props to the dude who threw a fire extinguisher off the roof of the millbank tower and nearly took out two cops
 
Dec 17, 2004
3,694
31
0
#16
we have to also consider that they have no history of actually paying for higher education in the uk, so being required to is a very cold bath...given what the commission on our debt proposed this past week, we are not far behind, except that the private benefit of education has a long tradition here, along with private acceptance of the cost
 

R

Sicc OG
Dec 7, 2005
7,629
1,807
113
34
#18
we have to also consider that they have no history of actually paying for higher education in the uk,
what do you mean? higher education has had to be paid for for as long as i can remember

my 3 years in university cost me over £3000 each and now they want to raise this to up to £9000 which is very bad news especially for people from low income families who want to go into higher education
 
Dec 17, 2004
3,694
31
0
#19
^^maybe im wrong..you should know better than i do, but im pretty sure higher ed was free over there until like 15 years ago or so.

compare that to the u.s. where theres never been universal free higher ed, and thats a point i was making....that it makes sense for uk students to get much more hyphy than american students over fee increases
 
Dec 17, 2004
3,694
31
0
#20
Funding history

In the years following the end of World War II local education authorities (LEAs) paid student tuition fees and provided non-mature students with a maintenance grant. Under the Education Act 1962 a national Mandatory Award of student maintenance grant was established, payable by the LEAs to students on most full-time courses.

As the university population rose during the 1980s the sums paid to universities became linked to their performance and efficiency, and by the mid 1990s funding per student had dropped by 40% since the mid-1970s, while numbers of full-time students had reached around 2,000,000 (around a third of the age group), up from around 1,300,000.[citation needed]

Following an investigation into the future of universities, the July 1997 report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education,[1] chaired by the then Sir Ronald Dearing recommended the ending of universal free higher education, and that students should pay £1,000 towards the cost of their tuition fees, which would be recovered in the form of a graduate tax.

At the time of the Dearing report, tuition fees were still paid by the government, student grants of up to £1,755 (£2,160 in London) were linked to family income, and a subsidised student loan of £1,685 (£2,085 in London) was available. Instead of following Dearing's suggestions, the grant was replaced by the present loan scheme, introduced for students starting in 1998. There was a transition year when about half the previous means-tested grant was available, although the new £1000 tuition fee still had to be paid. From 1999, the grant was abolished altogether.

The abolition of tuition fees was a major issue in the 1999 Scottish parliament elections, and subsequently was part of the agreement that led to the Labour/Liberal Democrats coalition that governed Scotland from 1999 to 2003.

From the academic year 2006/7, a new system of tuition fees was introduced in England. These variable tuition fees of up to £3000 per year are paid up-front as previously, but new student loans are available that may only be used to pay for tuition fees, and must be repaid upon graduation, in addition to the existing loan. In fact, there is very little variation in the tuition fees charged by universities — nearly all charge the maximum tuition fee on all courses. Instead, the differences appear in the nature and value of various 'access' bursaries that are on offer.



you must got that short term memory breh