U.N. Gives Sudan two choices

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 24, 2004
2,268
0
0
38
#1
1. Unarm the rebels responsible for the death over 30,000 people.


2. Face consequences





LOL whos the U.N. kidding what can they do other than place embargos on them.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
40
www.Tadou.com
#2
Sudan should be shaking in its fucking boots right now. Even though France, Russia and Germany will be too chicken shit (as always) to send troops, I'm sure the US would oblige a large contingent.


Countries WILL learn that it is not wise to carry out or sponsor the killing if innocent civilians.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
40
www.Tadou.com
#4
So do you believe it is wise, then? From a United Nations, International Court of Justice, Geneva Convention standpoint? For 10 seconds, try to take your mind off relating what i said ONLY to the United States .
 
Jun 24, 2004
2,268
0
0
38
#6
I think Tadou should mention the USA, because aside from the Brits we are the only ones to play an active role in the U.N.. The other countrys would rather sit around and became rich off the food for oil scandal.