Top 25 Most Dangerous Cities 2005

[JOK3R187]

we dont really like to speak on burlingame, the place is a shithole, it makes me sad everytime i hear the name. i mean people there are so cruel, 2 years ago some lady's pet ferret was run over and killed by a ruthless murder on a mountain bike. terrible place to live, mark my words: next year its gonna have a state of emergency.

LMFAO...o my lorrd

 

[grumpy]

i agree with wut u sayin but l.a. had their most homicides in 92 not in 2002

Nah didn't mean it like that. I meant that los angeles was the murder capitol of the country in 2002. I know it was worse in 92, not comparing 92 to 02.

r u talking about the Southeast Division (eastern south central [avalon gardens], watts [jordan downs, nickerson gardens, imperial courts, hacienda village])? if so they population is 150,000, so 70 murders for a population of 150,000 is not really that much........
the majority of L.A.'s homicides come from the 77th division (majority of this division is the westside of south central l.a., gangs like the rollin 60s, eight trays, hoovas, brims, denva lanes, etc....) and the Southeast division (this is parts of the east side of south central including unincorporated Watts, with gangs like the east coast crips, swans, grape streets, bounty hunters, avalon's, etc...)

70 murders is a lot for a population of even 150,000. And I didn't get that number from police statistics which you are referring to. 77th division and southeast division territories are divided up differently then the actually districts in those areas. Like in the west san fernando valley there is the lapd west valley division. The area that they cover has over 300,000 people and there was 14 murders this year so far but all most all of those murders occured in reseda/canoga area between 4 gangs. Same thing with southeast division you have all those projects and all the murders over there are happening in a small area not all over the division.

 

[415via810]

what is the valley? sun valley, pacoima, reseda, canoga park, encino just to name a few. Districts of la with populations of anywhere from 60,000 to 100,000 or more. That is the size of a city. Richmond, ca is considered a city with a population of approximately 80,000. Proof http://faculty.virginia.edu/ejus/COMM.htm

Pacoima is a unincorporated city of l.a. with a population of 63,071 http://www.csun.edu/~kas30362/pacoima.htm. The population is great enough to be it's own city but it is considered part of la so whatever statistics come from that area get put into the statistics of los angeles. See what i'm saying?

no richmond is about 100,000 people now, that was from 1980, in 2000 the population was 99,216 36% black, 26% hispanic, 22% white, then some asian in there as well, i have a feeling flint is going to be number 1 this year, there has already been 10+ murders i believe, but saginaw michigan if it was 6,000 people bigger than it would have been number one i believe, huge crime rate there.

 

[eastbayrider510]

well folkz...i was out in detroit this past january....it was a koo place to be....they got a lot of shyt popping out there besides gun shots....i expected some sort of beef but had none....and i plan on heading back sometime in the summer....the kats out there were loving the bay shyt out there too

 

[28g w/o the bag]

"detroit aint the east coast... its the muthafuckin midwest shootin up shit"