I don't know if it's too complicated for the average anti-war activist or in-activist to comprehend, but the potential war with Iraq is not as simple as Bush wants oil.
The "war for oil" argument lacks any serious analysis—historical, political or social.
It seems in their haste to be anti-war they cannot be bothered with such matters as the driving forces of the coming war, the history of US intervention in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East, the policies and political character of the Bush administration, the social situation in the US, or the economic context within which the war drive is unfolding.
Ok i vented. It just bothers me that people trivialize this to something as simple as oil. To me an anti-war movement will be worthless if it is based around the idea that this war is just because Iraq has lots of oil.
The "war for oil" argument lacks any serious analysis—historical, political or social.
It seems in their haste to be anti-war they cannot be bothered with such matters as the driving forces of the coming war, the history of US intervention in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East, the policies and political character of the Bush administration, the social situation in the US, or the economic context within which the war drive is unfolding.
Ok i vented. It just bothers me that people trivialize this to something as simple as oil. To me an anti-war movement will be worthless if it is based around the idea that this war is just because Iraq has lots of oil.