The truth about the Lakers..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 22, 2002
2,578
32
48
44
www.siccness.net
#1
It's real simple. They won 3 years in a row. They're over-paid, cocky and better than everyone else. THEY-DONT-CARE. Fuck Phil Jackson, you think they care about setting records for him? They proved their better and got lazy and complacent. And I'm not even a Lakers fan, I just like it that they embarass the rest of the league and the Kings, a team consisting of a bunch of weirdos and that's without Vlade are all pissed off. Shit's classic..

(Just my thoughts at 2:30 AM)




Vamps
IX.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#3
I think alot of that is right, thats the way it goes for every championship team filled with big heads. Over confidence can be the difference between winning a title and not even making the play-offs, were witnessing it first hand here. Lakers won 3 of there last 4, lets see where they take this. Scott Pollard, HAHAHAHAHA.
 
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#4
The Fakerz are plain boo boo!! No excuses! I figured nitro would jump on that, but we arent buyin it!! MJ and the Bulls never had this problem so "BULLSHIT"!!! Try again!! They just plain suck and the run is over!! Now what!! GOT EM!!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#5
The Bulls never had to play against these teams, they played against WEAK ass teams. What he said isnt an excuse, hes just callin it like he see's it, BULLS are over with, "WHY ARE YOU LIVIN IN THE PAST" who says that? Got You! Give it up, the Bulls are no longer, so accept it.
 
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#6
Like Is aid the Bulls never played like that, they were always tight, but thats because they are way better than the fakerz team!! Plus the Bulls played harder teams back then!! Teams are weak now!! so try again mane!! YOur team is wack face it, even excuses wont help!! Oh and your fakers are no longer as well!! GOT EM!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#7
The only team they had to overcome back then was the Utah Jazz, and even they werent that good. That Bulls team was great, but there wasnt a single team else. This years Kings would beat those Bulls, no joke. Just accept your Bulls are finished and we can move on.
 
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#12
Hahah yall see what I mean about nitro's lack of knowledge?? Dogg if u dont know, the Bulls won 6 titles, and I repeat 6 titles! So I will try to answer your question.... Utah played Chicago in 2 out of the 6 finals, and still whats your point??? The teams were better back then, and if u dont know that, then thats on u, but u had teams like New York with Ewing who always gave Jordan fits. U had Barkley and the Suns who were dope for a while. U had Seattle with Payton and in shape Kemp who had a tight team for a few years. U had Utah ofcourse. U had Indiana, with a yound Miller and company who was tight. U had Orlando with Shag and Penny in his prime who was tight. Damn do I need to go on. It was more competitive homie!! MJ was just the man so he would always come out on top!! SCHOOLED! GOT EM!!!!!
 
Sep 7, 2002
384
0
0
#13
Nitro, Im not tryin to knock you...

The old basketball days was waaaaay more competative than todays. They were more aggressive, it was more more physical; they had to earn those points. And players didn't really give a fuck about money (all they cared about was *RINGS*) And most importantly refs weren't as strict (meaning they didn't call that tippy tap bullshit, hand checks was legal) It was just straight ball. None of those gay ass rules like the present



Theres Seven games left to the half way point of the season, they atleast gotta reach 50 percent. But with no one else on the team steppin up and puttin numbers up, I don't see it happening. If they don't reach 50 (like i stated before) they're gonna have a hard time tryin to get back in it.

All Im sayin is, the formula doesn't last forever (meaning the same starting line up won't garauntee championships forever. You gotta rotate that shit around with some new faces in the line up) If you ask me, Jerry Buss & Mitch Kupzfachik (<--- ????) should've atleast sacraficed on some players and got a 3rd or maybe even a 4th scorer on the squad. I guess they gotta pay the piper. We'll see what happens tho...
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#15
BAMMER said:
Purebred Hogg said:
Yeah...what the fuck are you talkin about?You just agreed with his point...:confused:
Check Game.

KINGCZAR said:
If u think only the Jazz were good u have no knowledge of that time whatsoever!!
Nitro GH said:
Didnt Utah play them in the finals? Got You!
CZAR said Utah wasnt good, I pointed out they made it to the finals, and that they were the only good team. CZAR agreed with me by pointing out they went to the finals 2 out of 6 times. Purebreed/BAMMER tell me why you guys jumped on CZARs side and said that.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#16
Re: Nitro, Im not tryin to knock you...

Young Bull said:
The old basketball days was waaaaay more competative than todays. They were more aggressive, it was more more physical; they had to earn those points. And players didn't really give a fuck about money (all they cared about was *RINGS*) And most importantly refs weren't as strict (meaning they didn't call that tippy tap bullshit, hand checks was legal) It was just straight ball. None of those gay ass rules like the present
That maybe be true, but we will never know. There was never a team as deep as these kings. There sixth man is worthy of an all-star spot. There are fewer good teams now then there were 10 years ago, but i just think these few teams might have the edge. They have all the knowledge of the way ball used to be played, as well as the new era. I cant really tell you for sure that todays teams are better, no one can (except barkley) but i just dont see those Bulls/Jazz/Kincks beating these Lakers (last years atleast) or the Kings. Its all a matter of opinion, there can be no proof.

Young Bull said:
Theres Seven games left to the half way point of the season, they atleast gotta reach 50 percent. But with no one else on the team steppin up and puttin numbers up, I don't see it happening. If they don't reach 50 (like i stated before) they're gonna have a hard time tryin to get back in it.

All Im sayin is, the formula doesn't last forever (meaning the same starting line up won't garauntee championships forever. You gotta rotate that shit around with some new faces in the line up) If you ask me, Jerry Buss & Mitch Kupzfachik (<--- ????) should've atleast sacraficed on some players and got a 3rd or maybe even a 4th scorer on the squad. I guess they gotta pay the piper. We'll see what happens tho...
I agree man. I wasnt in any way trying to say the Lakers are a championship clibur team right now. I know there playing like shit. But what i was discussing with this pack of haters, is way off topic.

MB3 said:
The bulls also had them knicks and these knicks weren't a wack ass team.
When i said the Bulls were the only good team, i didnt mean for it to be taken literally. Your just lookin for a quick way out. There were some good ass teams no doubt.
 
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#17
Hahaha damn dogg u are worse off than I thought!! Now u tryin to say i said the Jazz werent good. Show me where I said that folks!! Read back all my replys here and make sure before u say stupid shit. I said the Jazz werent the only good team idiot! Damn dogg why do I keep goin with u when u aint worth the time cause u dont know shit. Now folks are startin to see how much u lack of knowledge... I aint gonna repeat my self but back then competition was better, and u keep pointin out the Kings, but I thought the Fakerz were better hahah!! They had hella tight players back then and even 6th men worthy of allstar!! Thats how u judge form 1 team bein deep so that makes it better than the NBA in the 90's hahahaha!! U have went bankrupt!!! GOT EM!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#18
KINGCZAR said:
Hahaha damn dogg u are worse off than I thought!! Now u tryin to say i said the Jazz werent good. Show me where I said that folks!! Read back all my replys here and make sure before u say stupid shit. I said the Jazz werent the only good team idiot! Damn dogg why do I keep goin with u when u aint worth the time cause u dont know shit. Now folks are startin to see how much u lack of knowledge... I aint gonna repeat my self but back then competition was better, and u keep pointin out the Kings, but I thought the Fakerz were better hahah!! They had hella tight players back then and even 6th men worthy of allstar!! Thats how u judge form 1 team bein deep so that makes it better than the NBA in the 90's hahahaha!! U have went bankrupt!!! GOT EM!!!
I stand corrected, i thought you said "If you think the Jazz were good..." I missed the 'only' part. Everything else you said is nonsense as uaual, like a give a fuck what you think about my sports knowledge. If i were to care what people think about my knowledge, it would be people who have some themselves. Ive actually learned to weed through your posts and get past all the shit talk and get to your point, most of the times i dont find it, but hey, some people need a cover. Shit talking is yours, im not gonna hate on that.