The Pickens Clause

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 4, 2002
3,312
1
0
47
#5
So are you saying John Shitna is a good qb? lol.

Think what you want. Peter Warrick is a factor, and he's on the come up this year.
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#6
So are you saying John Shitna is a good qb? lol.
Did I say that?

You were saying that Warrick hasn't had a good season because of the quarterback.

So...as an example, I referred to last year.

Chad Johnson had a pretty good season with, as you say, Shitna.

Think what you want. Peter Warrick is a factor, and he's on the come up this year.
Thanks...I will think what I want.

Peter Warrick is, and has been, a non-factor. And with "Shitna" as the QB again this year....How is your Warrick going to have a break out year?

That's right...he won't. Looks like it's going to be another long and miserable season for Warrick.
 
May 4, 2002
3,312
1
0
47
#7
Go back to your cage gimp! Shitna won't be the starter for long. He always gets hurt.

You're obviously a Peter Warrick hater. You must be a gimpy Hurricaine fan.

And since when was the article about Peter Warrick. It's about Carson Palmer. Peter Warrick was only mentioned in it cause he has been the only first round pick of the Bengals in the last four years to avoid the Pickens clause. And yet, he hasn't talked shit about the Bengals in the media.
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#8
Go back to your cage gimp!
Is this supposed to be an insult?

Shitna won't be the starter for long. He always gets hurt.
Maybe so...but he is the starter for now. There goes your so called break-out year for Warrick.

You're obviously a Peter Warrick hater. You must be a gimpy Hurricaine fan.
No, I don't hate Warrick, and I'm a Ohio State fan.

But me being a Browns fan, I follow the division pretty closely. He is, and I repeat, a non-factor. If you think otherwise, you are sadly mistaken. He hasn't done anything in the NFL.

He is young though. Maybe I was too harsh...he may have a good season, but he would have to go to another team. That, or the Bengals would have to somehow become a good team.

And since when was the article about Peter Warrick. It's about Carson Palmer.
The article wasn't about him, but you mentioned that Warrick would have a break-out year...so I commented on that.
 
May 4, 2002
3,312
1
0
47
#9
gimpypimp said:
He is young though. Maybe I was too harsh...he may have a good season, but he would have to go to another team. That, or the Bengals would have to somehow become a good team.
Finally you make some sense. He plays on the BENGALS. They suck ass perenially. And even though Chad Johson had 450 more yards receiving, he had one less touchdown than Peter. And I wouldn't say that somone who has 600 yards receiving and 6 touchdowns in the NFL is a non factor. You want non factor, look at JJ Chokes. He had 300 yds receiving and only one td last year. THAT's a non factor. Also, Cincinatti's special teams are terrible, so his punt returns are non existent, like his return teams blocking. And I want to add that they only handed the ball off to Peter 8 times last year, and when he was at Florida State, he would get that a game. Be it through a direct handoff, reverse, or lining up at qb, he touched the ball and made things happen.

I'm pretty sure this is the last year of his contract, and he won't even think of re-signing with Cincinatti. Everybody plays good when the money's on the line.