The North American Union- Good Bye U.S Dollar....Hello Amero!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#1
Something to soak up. I don't know it all but the signs are there for the North American Union to go through! Here's a compilation of videos from U.S news media I have come across.


North American Union








The Amero





NAFTA Super HighWay!










I think it will happen in our lifetime! You notice how our current money gets new make overs every couple of years? It's not to prevent counterfiting. I think its to get us to accept the AMERO when it comes. Condition us to the look of new money. Just my opinion.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#3
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

there should be a tin hat forum for this shit.

couldn't you have atleast posted this spam in one of the other threads that the other nut jobs started about the NAU?
 
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#4
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

there should be a tin hat forum for this shit.

couldn't you have atleast posted this spam in one of the other threads that the other nut jobs started about the NAU?


If you don't like the topic...don't enter the post ediot! Let alone reply to it. There is a population of people on the Siccness that find reading or viewing this material educational....it you aint one of em.....kick rocks! It's the OPEN forum! Fools be killin me, trolling the forums with their "E-Powers". Does it validate you or somethin? Does it give you a sense of superiority that you don't have away from your keyboard?
 

L.D.S.

The Bakersman
Aug 14, 2006
19,934
4,044
113
40
Mizzourah
#7
This thread is stupid. If I spent my time online looking up conspiracy theories, I'd end up thinking my cousin was bigfoot, my aunt is a government created chupacabra, and that the world will end because someone put a tracking chip in my dog.
 

pAc0

Sicc OG
Feb 8, 2006
2,174
64
0
62
#12
i have a feeling that Mr. Rictus is Coldblooded for some odd reason(or someone who's had a different screen name). i'm probably wrong though.
 
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#16
i hate conspiracy theories


It's not a conspiracy. It is publicly debated in the current Presidential primaries. It's called NAFTA(North American Free Trade Agreement)




Look at this Bill floating around congress by Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. to stop NAFTA
From the Library of Congress website!
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO
Next Hit Forward New Bills Search
Prev Hit Back HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Help
Contents Display
GPO's PDF DisplayCongressional Record ReferencesBill Summary & StatusPrinter Friendly Display - 4,539 bytes.[Help] XML Display
[Help]

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North... (Introduced in House)
HCON 40 IH
110th CONGRESS 1st Session H. CON. RES. 40
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2007

Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. WAMP, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. PAUL, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. DUNCAN, and Ms. FOXX) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
Whereas the United States Departments of State, Commerce, and Homeland Security participated in the formation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) on March 23, 2005, representing a tri-lateral agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico designed, among other things, to facilitate common regulatory schemes between these countries;
Whereas reports issued by the SPP indicate that it has implemented regulatory changes among the three countries that circumvent United States trade, transportation, homeland security, and border security functions and that the SPP will continue to do so in the future;
Whereas the actions taken by the SPP to coordinate border security by eliminating obstacles to migration between Mexico and the United States actually makes the United States-Mexico border less secure because Mexico is the primary source country of illegal immigrants into the United States;
Whereas according to the Department of Commerce, United States trade deficits with Mexico and Canada have significantly increased since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA);
Whereas the economic and physical security of the United States is impaired by the potential loss of control of its borders attendant to the full operation of NAFTA and the SPP;
Whereas the regulatory and border security changes implemented and proposed by the SPP violate and threaten United States sovereignty;
Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System from the west coast of Mexico through the United States and into Canada has been suggested as part of a North American Union to facilitate trade between the SPP countries;
Whereas the State of Texas has already begun planning of the Trans-Texas Corridor, a major multi-modal transportation project beginning at the United States-Mexico border, which would serve as an initial section of a NAFTA Superhighway System;
Whereas it could be particularly difficult for Americans to collect insurance from Mexican companies which employ Mexican drivers involved in accidents in the United States, which would likely increase the insurance rates for American drivers;
Whereas future unrestricted foreign trucking into the United States can pose a safety hazard due to inadequate maintenance and inspection, and can act collaterally as a conduit for the entry into the United States of illegal drugs, illegal human smuggling, and terrorist activities; and
Whereas a NAFTA Superhighway System would likely include funds from foreign consortiums and be controlled by foreign management, which threatens the sovereignty of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

  • Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That--

    • (1) the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System;

    • (2) the United States should not allow the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) to implement further regulations that would create a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and

    • (3) the President of the United States should indicate strong opposition to these acts or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States.

And here it sits waiting action
Latest Major Action: 1/23/2007 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

In case you don't know. This is what they do with those "pesky" bills in Congress. They float em along and pass the buck to the next man until its way too late to do anything about it!
 
Nov 21, 2005
5,793
5
0
42
www.revver.com
#17
Here's some news behind the scenes the States have been fighting REAL ID.. and the NAU..

Ron Paul and other good people in congress are fighting this.

They tried to shut down the net.. so people would've find out about this.

Only reason.. we're not already.. is a world government with chips in out bodies.. and the net shut down.. is because of the people who have been fighting for the people's rights..

They wanted a FULL BLOWN new world order.. but the year 2000 .. looks like they failed.

Fuck the REAL ID.. and the NAU.

N.H. and Montana are two states who passed resolutions to block the REAL ID and NAU.. and other states have as well, and some have even declared independence from the REAL ID..

this is not going down without a fight.. also if it was a fucking conspiracy.. THEORY.. why are government people in the states resisting it? cause they found out.. and it got exposed.. they were trying to sneak this in, without anyone knowing.

This shit has been exposed, and will be crushed.. and that's the bottom line.

fuck what you talkin bout!
 
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#18
They tried to shut down the net.. so people would've find out about this.

That's why fools need to enjoy what we have while we have it. When Internet 2 goes live. It's a wrap. You thought North Korea and China had shit on lockdown! PLEASE!

http://internet2.edu/

Internet 2

FACT BOX Internet2 is a consortium being led by 202 universities working in partnership with industry and government to develop and deploy advanced network technologies.

Enter "Internet 2" -- a U.S.-led effort to build cyberspace all over again, this time better.
"Well the current Internet is not designed for the next generation of applications," said Ted Hanss, Director of Internet 2.
"It's really focused on tens of millions of dial-up users. Not the applications that would really change how we do teaching, learning and education."
The Internet 2 backbone in the United States moves billions of bits of data per second, 300,000 times faster than the connection we have at home, said Hanss.
Moving with such speed, Internet 2 will be able to provide remote diagnosis for doctors, send detailed medical files in a flash, stage high-resolution videoconferences and download virtual reality applications.
Champions of the project say Internet 2 shows what the net will do three to five years from now.
'Wonderful experiment'

But even a souped-up cyberspace is susceptible to worms, viruses and just plain junk or spam.
And then there's the millions of mobile devices and appliances that are moving online, requiring more IP addresses.
Back at the Internet monitoring station, engineers are scrambling to surmount those challenges, taking heart from their recent achievement.
"I would view the last 10 years as a wonderful experiment," said Wong.
"Many of us were just kids, still young at heart now. We were trying all these different things. And we made our fair share of mistakes. The question is what can we learn from those mistakes?"
The challenge is to build a cyber-sequel that's not just a pipe dream.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#19
i dont understand whats wrong with it honestly. it would make more sense to have one world currency. its gonna happen one of these millenia anyways. i just wish we could rid the world of religion and we could move on to humanity.