was just poking around online cuz i was bored, and i noticed that in 1999/2000, around the time of the decline of our glorious empire, the 49ers lost tim mcdonald, merton hanks, and ken norton jr..however upon further research, i noticed that norton was 34 yrs old (couldve had 2-3 more in him), and that hanks and mcdonald were 31 and 30, respectively..
what i dont understand is why were the 3 let go? i mean, if it was cuz of the cheap ass yorks i understand that, but these guys each had more football left in them..altho i did notice that of the 3, hanks played a year with seattle in 1999, while the other 2 left the game entirely post-49ers..
i think if these 3 (or at least 2/3) had stayed, the team would've been better off for a few more years..yes i know hanks/mcdonald was replaced with lance schulters, but i woulda took those 2 any day..
discuss..
what i dont understand is why were the 3 let go? i mean, if it was cuz of the cheap ass yorks i understand that, but these guys each had more football left in them..altho i did notice that of the 3, hanks played a year with seattle in 1999, while the other 2 left the game entirely post-49ers..
i think if these 3 (or at least 2/3) had stayed, the team would've been better off for a few more years..yes i know hanks/mcdonald was replaced with lance schulters, but i woulda took those 2 any day..
discuss..