Survivor Series

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 15, 2002
2,964
8
0
#1
I haven't watched wrestling for several years now, so excuse my ignorance. I'm just wondering, do they still do the Survivor Series teams? That used to be my favorite event next to the Royal Rumble.
 

Cheaptimes

C'mon now...
Jan 3, 2005
4,591
2,123
113
46
www.twitter.com
#4
Its pretty much a regular event, although it is still in the top four (summerslam, royal rumble, wrestlemania...)
they may hold up to two matches (one per brand) of 4-5 man teams. Its not what it use to be.
 

GHP

Sicc OG
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
852
113
45
#5
last year didn't they just have a raw team fight a smackdown team? They need to do it like back in the days.

Better yet they should have like 3 interbrand survivor matches and the winners of each have a sole survivor match and get some kind of title shot or a no 30 in the rumble bid or something to the winner.

We all need to work for the WWE, I tell ya!
 
Feb 23, 2003
5,461
47
0
43
#6
^^GOOD IDEA BUT THE WWE WOULDN'T EXECUTE IT RIGHT... YOU KNOW HOW THEY ARE NOW... WWE=FUCKIN LAZZZZYYYYYY!!!!!!!
 
May 15, 2002
2,964
8
0
#7
Right on for the info, folks. I kinda figured it died down only because it seems no one gets along anymore. Back in the day there were the good and the bad, and you could basically lump any of the good with the good and the bad with the bad and it would work out. When I see wrestling on TV now, it seems everyone hates everyone for the most part (I could be wrong though).
 
May 11, 2002
1,405
79
48
#9
Survivor Series really should be cancelled. In my opinion taking away the teams match format nullified any reason of having the event. The sole purpose of the pay per view originally was because of the elimination syle matches with teams.