Soviet clean sweep of heavyweight division?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
Where have all the American heavyweights gone?

Smokin' Joe Frazier doesn't even know who the world heavyweight champion is - "All these crazy sanctioning belts they've got - do you know who it is?"




Well, there's the WBA's Nikolay Valuev of Russia, IBF king Wladimir Klitschko of Ukraine and WBO champ Serguei Lyakhovich of Belarus.

But then we only know because it's our job to know - and even we're not sure of the spellings.

There's also Hasim Rahman, who defends his WBC crown against Kazak-born Oleg Maskaev in Las Vegas on Saturday.


Rahman


Maskaev

Promoter Bob Arum has dubbed Rahman America's "Last Line of Defence". Lose, and it will be a 'Soviet' clean sweep and a bloody nose for Uncle Sam.

"Patriotic, that's what it is," says Rahman. "I need to hold it down for my country. If I lose this fight, I let me down, my family down, my team down and my country down."

Such jingoism has got Maskaev's back up, not surprising when you discover he became a citizen of the United States two years ago.

But in the eyes of the great American public, Maskaev will always be more beef stroganoff than apple pie.

Where have all America's big men gone? Ask eminent trainer Emmanuel Steward and he'll tell you they're linemen in the NFL or centres in the NBA.

"The kids are attracted to football and basketball as they know they can make unbelievable money," Steward, trainer of Wladimir Klitschko and former trainer of Lennox Lewis and Evander Holyfield, tells BBC Sport.

"A friend of mine, New York entrepreneur Michael King, is going after kids who are considering football and basketball and enticing them into amateur programmes with big money.

"We have to be able to give them money to encourage them to stay in boxing."

Al Mitchell, former head coach of the USA Olympic boxing team and one of America's most respected amateur trainers, concurs.

"There's no retirement fund across the board like there is in other sports," Mitchell tells BBC Sport.

"What I mean by that is, in football and basketball you're guaranteed to get $1m in the first couple of years. So our big, young athletes that used to be heavyweights are going into those sports instead."

Money is the recurring theme in our conversations with Frazier, Steward and Mitchell.

"If America paid the young kids a certain amount of money to stay in the amateur system until they were 22, 23 or 24, you'd see some outstanding heavyweights," says Mitchell, who is now head coach of the US Olympic Education Center boxing team.

"But in America, they're turning pro at 16, 17 and 18, and if you don't get the experience in the amateur system, you're in a world of trouble.

"Amateur boxing is like high school or college - it's where you learn about the real world."

Steward adds: "The American amateur programme hasn't even had enough to send fighters to some international tournaments.

"And because there's no money in the amateurs, they're turning professional so quick and the kids aren't getting the experience they need.

"I predicted the next generation of heavyweights was going to come from Europe because it's still very prestigious to win Olympic medals there and they stay amateur until 24 or 25.

"And the European system of teaching the basics of boxing is superior to America. Wladimir Klitschko's basics are so much better than American boxers."

Frazier, world champion for three years in the 1970s, agrees poor schooling is the main reason Americans are struggling at heavyweight.

"These guys don't train right," the 62-year-old, who was trained by the great Eddie Futch, tells BBC Sport. "Some trainers today have never had gloves on in their lives.

"Back in the old days, trainers would know the fight game and know what to tell the guys to do. With boxing more than any other sport, you really have to know what you're talking about."

There is, of course, a rather more prosaic reason why African-Americans, the mainstay of the heavyweight scene for the last 50 years, are no longer filtering into boxing.

As Mitchell explains: "There are so many ways to get rich in the United States now. When the Irish, the Jews and the Italians first came over, they all went to boxing.

"But once they got into the system and learned there were other jobs and other ways to make money, they didn't do that any more.

"African-Americans are doing the same thing now. In the wider scheme of things it's a good thing. But it's a bad thing for our sport.

"Eastern Europe is like America was 25 years ago. The people over there are poor and there's fewer other ways out.

"Here in America, even poor kids are going to college and saying 'I don't want to get beaten up, it's not worth it'."

Indeed, Frazier, who worked on his father's farm from the age of seven, has more in common with Maskaev, who did much the same back in Kazakhstan, than Rahman, the product of a lower middle-class family from Baltimore.

The immediate future of heavyweight boxing across the Atlantic does not look good.

When Rahman, 34, met Maskaev, 37, seven years ago, Maskaev knocked him into the lap of a television commentator at the Convention Hall in Atlantic City.

It would not be a big surprise if Maskaev repeated the feat this weekend.

More worrying, there are no fighters under the age of 30 in the independent International Boxing Organisation's top 30 heavyweights.

"Every now and again, a Tyson comes out of the woodwork and runs everyone over," says Mitchell.

"But the picture now looks bleak and it will stay that way until they find a way to hold on to the young kids."

Frazier agrees: "I don't see anyone who's going to bring back the glory days," he says. "It's sad, but I'm only one of a few voices expressing concern."

Steward, though, reckons he might just have the saviour of American boxing tucked away in his Kronk gym in Detroit.

"I have a kid who will be the next big thing - Isaiah Thomas," says Steward.

"He won the Under-17 heavyweight world title in Liverpool last year aged 16. He's 6ft 4in, just turned 17 and extremely gifted.

"He'll hopefully fight at light heavyweight at the 2008 Olympics and by the time he's 21 or 22, he'll be heavyweight champion of the world.

"Apart from him though, the cupboard is bare."
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#5
The US has some prospects still.
Brewster shouldn't be counted out, and you can always count of Ruiz to snooze out a title shot victory.

I wish Malik Scott's (25-0 10KO's) promoters would step him up a notch. The kid is pretty good.
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
41
#6
Good read.

I used to love seeing the heavyweight giants get in there and pound it out...but there aren't really a whole bunch of fighters in the heavyweight division that are really entertaining to watch IMO. Most of the names I don't even recognize...
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#9
^I agree. But I admit the fight was somewhat entertaining. Rahman got fucked up in the last round. It was comical though, seeing him try his hardest to grab his oppenent and even the ref from falling down. At one point he grabbed dudes leg and would not let go.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
#10
this is a damn shame all rahman had to do is hold on it was no way in hell vegas was letting oleg win a ud trust me. But didt anyone notice the ref pull the tape off rock glove so he could get his shit together