Six Hundred & Sixty Six Posts

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to our savior, the almighty himself, Jesus Christ. Without Him, I would have never received the enormous honor of living the day I posted Six Hundred and Sixty Six times on the Siccness.

Secondly, I would like to give thanks to our beloved conservative, Mcleanhatch. Without you my brilliant comrade, Six Hundred and Sixty Six posts would be just a dream. When I go back and reflect on all the garbage you have posted on the Sicc, I understand now that you truly aren’t that foolish like many assume, but a much more complex child-man. You motivate others around you with your stupidity that drive them to reach their goal of Six Hundred and Sixty Six posts. And for that Mclean, I give thanks.

Last of all, I would like to give some words of encouragement to those in the lower hundred posts, which is, with a little hard work, faith is Christ, and idiots like Mclean to argue with, you too can post Six Hundred and Sixty Six times.

Thank you and God bless our strong economy!
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
44
#5
Nothing but love....You know me from the beginning...nothing but love


As long as I live I will never forget the SHIT we have been through.....nothing but respect.

Erin Go Braugh!


"I smoke my Newport to the butt like it's the last mother fucker left" 2-Pac

 
S

Spliff aka mac jesus

Guest
#7
Last of all, I would like to give some words of encouragement to those in the lower hundred posts, which is, with a little hard work, faith is Christ, and idiots like Mclean to argue with, you too can post Six Hundred and Sixty Six times.
Thanks for the encouragement, one day i'll get there.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#9
My next goal in life is 1999 posts on the siccness. You know why? cuz if you turn it upside down its 666 and then followed by 1 or something.

I know what you guys are thinking, "he must be crazy, no one can post that many times!" I know, I know, its going to be a tough goal to reach, but I am confident, with help, mainly from mclean, that I can and will reach it.
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
45
#11
2-0-Sixx said:
First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to our savior, the almighty himself, Jesus Christ. Without Him, I would have never received the enormous honor of living the day I posted Six Hundred and Sixty Six times on the Siccness.

Secondly, I would like to give thanks to our beloved conservative, Mcleanhatch. Without you my brilliant comrade, Six Hundred and Sixty Six posts would be just a dream. When I go back and reflect on all the garbage you have posted on the Sicc, I understand now that you truly aren’t that foolish like many assume, but a much more complex child-man. You motivate others around you with your stupidity that drive them to reach their goal of Six Hundred and Sixty Six posts. And for that Mclean, I give thanks.

Last of all, I would like to give some words of encouragement to those in the lower hundred posts, which is, with a little hard work, faith is Christ, and idiots like Mclean to argue with, you too can post Six Hundred and Sixty Six times.

Thank you and God bless our strong economy!
Delete this kids posts, he never talks about shit but some iraqis getting the shaft. Go to Iraq and help the resistance. You always find ways to diss God dont you kid. Grow up son, you cant harbor hate for God all your life junior. I know you will respond with some blazhy blah blah, so to save you the time ill just say what most of these cats wont say, your lame. Go ahead and respond just proving my point. Like Guru says "There ought to be laws against you yapping your jaws"

If you dont like it kid then take it personal- Guru.
 
Dec 2, 2004
239
0
0
36
#14
Rob S4 said:
Delete this kids posts, he never talks about shit but some iraqis getting the shaft. Go to Iraq and help the resistance.
that post had nothin to do with iraq dumbass

Rob S4 said:
You always find ways to diss God dont you kid. Grow up son, you cant harbor hate for God all your life junior.
youre a grownass man, how can you play pretend still?

Rob S4 said:
Like Guru says "There ought to be laws against you yapping your jaws"
exactly

Rob S4 said:
If you dont like it kid then take it personal- Guru.
you dont know shit about gangstarr... just like with esham ..... most rappers you listen to express totally opposite political, religious and social views from yours... u hella confused or somethin cuz your ass should be listening to garth brooks.
 
May 4, 2002
10,362
20,636
113
#15
Revelation! 666 is not the number of the beast (it's a devilish 616)
By Tom Anderson
01 May 2005


A newly discovered fragment of the oldest surviving copy of the New Testament indicates that, as far as the Antichrist goes, theologians, scholars, heavy metal groups, and television evangelists have got the wrong number. Instead of 666, it's actually the far less ominous 616.

The new fragment from the Book of Revelation, written in ancient Greek and dating from the late third century, is part of a hoard of previously unintelligible manuscripts discovered in historic dumps outside Oxyrhynchus in Egypt. Now a team of expert classicists, using new photographic techniques, are finally deciphering the original writing.

Professor David Parker, Professor of New Testament Textual Criticism and Paleography at the University of Birmingham, thinks that 616, although less memorable than 666, is the original. He said: "This is an example of gematria, where numbers are based on the numerical values of letters in people's names. Early Christians would use numbers to hide the identity of people who they were attacking: 616 refers to the Emperor Caligula."

The Book of Revelation is traditionally considered to be written by John, a disciple of Jesus; it identifies 666 as the mark of the Antichrist. In America, the fundamentalist Christian right often use the number in sermons about the coming Apocalypse.

They and satanists responded coolly to the new "Revelation". Peter Gilmore, High Priest of the Church of Satan, based in New York, said: "By using 666 we're using something that the Christians fear. Mind you, if they do switch to 616 being the number of the beast then we'll start using that."

so much for that satan 666 bullshit. ROCK ON lol
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#16
^^^They're over one hundred years late.

"This solution was given by Ferdinand Benary of Berlin. The name is Nero. The number is based on xxx xxxx Neron Kesar, the Hebrew spelling of the Greek Nerôn Kaisar, Emperor Nero, authenticated by means of the Talmud and Palmyrian inscriptions. This inscription was found on coins of Nero's time minted in the eastern half of the empire. And so — n (nun)=50; r (resh)=200; v (vau) for o=6; n (nun)=50; k (kaph)=100; s (samech)=60; r (resh)=200. Total 666. If we take as a basis the Latin spelling Nero Caesar the second nun=50 disappears and we get 666 - 50 = 616, which is Irenaeus's reading." - Frederick Engels 1894
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#17
http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/skepticism/616666.html


@206 A couple of weeks back I asked you if you knew what a certain word was. Did you ever find out?

616 is the greek total but what about the Hebrew and Latin totals? Anyway peep this http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/666.htm


You can even find versions with 605 but I've come across stuff from early writers (2nd and 3rd century) which comment on 616 and consider it an error. I'll let you guys find them..... :cool:
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#18
http://www.edwardtbabinski.us/skepticism/616666.html


@206 A couple of weeks back I asked you if you knew what a certain word was. Did you ever find out?

616 is the greek total but what about the Hebrew and Latin totals? Anyway peep this http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/666.htm


You can even find versions with 605 but I've come across stuff from early writers (2nd and 3rd century) which comment on 616 and consider it an error. I'll let you guys find them..... :cool: