Should Immigrants be implanted with microchips?
- Thread starter HERESY
- Start date
FoeTwin, HERESY, and myself have all posted topics regarding chips years ago.
In one of my threads, dated 07-25-2003, 04:55 PM, I stated:
link
As far as immigration topics, there were not nearly as many as today (for obvious reasons), but I have always maintained my support for illegal immigrants. Since the creation of NAFTA in 1994, the number of Illegal Mexican immigrants has rose from approximately 3 million to 8 or 9 million. You want to slow down or decrease the illegal immigrant flow - abolish NAFTA.
In one of my threads, dated 07-25-2003, 04:55 PM, I stated:
link
As far as immigration topics, there were not nearly as many as today (for obvious reasons), but I have always maintained my support for illegal immigrants. Since the creation of NAFTA in 1994, the number of Illegal Mexican immigrants has rose from approximately 3 million to 8 or 9 million. You want to slow down or decrease the illegal immigrant flow - abolish NAFTA.
This is the bottom line. In order to get rid of illegal immigration, the conditions that lead people in that direction need to be taken care of first. And before anyone goes off on how that is Mexico's problem and not ours, well please look up the history of US intervention in Mexico and also the NAFTA treaty.
Exactly, it was implemented under Clinton, the U.S. House passed NAFTA by 234-200 (132 Republicans and 102 Democrats voting in favor) and the U.S. Senate passed it by 61-38.
Matters are only going to get worse, the same interests who got us into NAFTA are now pushing to expand it and lock in 31 more countries in Latin American and the Caribbean through the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and five Central American countries through a Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA).
Matters are only going to get worse, the same interests who got us into NAFTA are now pushing to expand it and lock in 31 more countries in Latin American and the Caribbean through the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and five Central American countries through a Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA).
thats just some straight up racist bullshit to sudjest implanting immigrants,if any1 should be getting implanted couse they're a threat to americans its all these fukin child molesters running around harming our children....but wait,then that would mean implanting a whole lotta white guys and that would just be unconstitutional right?
This is why your logic is inherently flawed. What you are saying “we are not free as it is so why not give up more of our freedoms” could be analogized to
“I am already obese so rather than loosing weight, why not just keep eating and get fatter?”
Or
“Hey I already have cancer, might as well keep smoking”
This logic fails to account for the unavoidable consequences of the decisions.
Planting chips in immigrants is a terrible idea. This is nothing more than the first step in the process of placing a chip in everyone in the US. First it will be the immigrants, then (as mentioned) prisoners and convicts, after that it could be the elderly for “health and safety” reasons, then maybe students at public institutions, and so on until everyone is covered.
This is my prediction of how this whole issue is going to unfold. This idea will be tossed around and eventually dismissed in the name of personal privacy. Next, the government will continue to allow thousands of illegal immigrants to cross into the US. After some time a terrorist attack will occur on our own soil and the terrorists will be found to have passed our porous borders. After this is made public the issue of planting microchips in immigrants will be brought up in the aftermath of the attack. In the name of national security and patriotism, the gullible American public will be duped into accepting the idea of chipping immigrants, and the path I detailed earlier will begin.
“I am already obese so rather than loosing weight, why not just keep eating and get fatter?”
Or
“Hey I already have cancer, might as well keep smoking”
This logic fails to account for the unavoidable consequences of the decisions.
Planting chips in immigrants is a terrible idea. This is nothing more than the first step in the process of placing a chip in everyone in the US. First it will be the immigrants, then (as mentioned) prisoners and convicts, after that it could be the elderly for “health and safety” reasons, then maybe students at public institutions, and so on until everyone is covered.
This is my prediction of how this whole issue is going to unfold. This idea will be tossed around and eventually dismissed in the name of personal privacy. Next, the government will continue to allow thousands of illegal immigrants to cross into the US. After some time a terrorist attack will occur on our own soil and the terrorists will be found to have passed our porous borders. After this is made public the issue of planting microchips in immigrants will be brought up in the aftermath of the attack. In the name of national security and patriotism, the gullible American public will be duped into accepting the idea of chipping immigrants, and the path I detailed earlier will begin.
HOW MUCH OF A FIGHT CAN WE PUT UP? YOU AND I KNOW THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO PREVENT THE MAJORITY OF CRIME FROM GOING DOWN, IDENITY THEFT,AND MISSING PERSONz.
THATz TRUE BUT, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOT GET FUCKED OVER. I WOULD LIKE TO NOT HAVE TO CARRY/TAKE AROUND MY PERSONAL INFO/RECORDz. AND ON THE SAME HAND WHAT I POSTED ABOVE....
