SF votes yes to banning guns in the city....?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 27, 2002
14,470
135
63
#1
well, it got approved or whatever....the initative to ban guns in is bullshit...i cant believe it made it...

this is bullshit, how are you going to tell an entire city they cannot protect their valuable with a gun?...i mena the FUCKIN CONSTITUION gives us this right...doesnt it?

so what the fuck....

*awaits 2-0sixx's political debate response....


lol
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#3
The constitution actually grants americans the right to bear arms...WITHIN A STRUCTURED MILITIA. Although the second part often goes over looked. This was a right written back when americans needed to be ready to fight the British. Fuck, as many people been getting shot lately, I'd be down to get rid of guns.
 
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
41
#5
L Mac-a-docious said:
The constitution actually grants americans the right to bear arms...WITHIN A STRUCTURED MILITIA. Although the second part often goes over looked. This was a right written back when americans needed to be ready to fight the British. Fuck, as many people been getting shot lately, I'd be down to get rid of guns.
the way i see it is a gun ban would only keep guns out of the hands of responsible gun owners who just want to protect themselves and their families. the irresponsible gun owners are still gonna get them off the streets. there is no way that will stop.

and the second ammendment says that we have the right to form militias AND to bear arms:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
 

Cheaptimes

C'mon now...
Jan 3, 2005
4,591
2,123
113
46
www.twitter.com
#7
actually now that you mention it, I remember that the city passed a law for the legalization on medicinal marijuana, and the feds say that federal law appiles regardless. This is all just a formality.

or you could just drive down to daly city to get shot in the ass now.
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#8
bayGIANTS said:
the way i see it is a gun ban would only keep guns out of the hands of responsible gun owners who just want to protect themselves and their families. the irresponsible gun owners are still gonna get them off the streets. there is no way that will stop.

and the second ammendment says that we have the right to form militias AND to bear arms:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
That's one way to look at it. But you should also consider how many gun deaths there are every year in major european cities that have anti gun laws, as opposed to gun deaths in America, the #s are astonishing. And the way this sentence can be interperated..."A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Is that the bearing of arms comes in the context of "A well regulated militia." But hey, the Supreme court still hasn't definitively said what this means, so it's up for discussion.
 
Jan 19, 2003
993
0
0
#11
bayGIANTS said:
the way i see it is a gun ban would only keep guns out of the hands of responsible gun owners who just want to protect themselves and their families. the irresponsible gun owners are still gonna get them off the streets. there is no way that will stop.
where do u think we... er.... those people get the guns??? they originate from the squares, then they come to those who are really gonna use em. if no one can get them legally, it's gonna be a SHITLOAD harder to come up on them in the streets.
 
Jul 21, 2004
465
0
0
#12
although guns have its uses like protection, security, dirty harry- tough guy-gangsta-patriotic psycho-suicidal personna, acurate distance shooting range, and over all even a mechanical human design wonder, but seriously.....its a waste of raw materials which can be more utilize in building homes and medical facilities.
 
May 19, 2005
2,341
112
63
41
#14
^^^im with this guy,if no ones got guns why do you need one,fine get a rifle so you can feel big when your shootin beer cans in the dessert,tell me the positive consequences of owning a hand gun,fuck it ,look at europe they aint gun crazy,and i read a statitic thing on people that own guns are way more prone to shoot others or themselves on purpose then non gun owning wierdos,not because they are crazy people,but because they have that option tucked away underneath there socks in the drawer.i always thought two wrongs dont make a right,if someone is trying to break into your house,you shootin his ass cause its in self defense makes it ok?many would say yes,but it just seams like its violence cleaning over violence...if anything have a knife,cause if duude is in arms reach of me to shank him 4 times,this fucker was all up in my face askin for it.Everybody claims its our right,but it was wut 3 hundo years ago,times done changed,pass a joint,not a bullet
 
May 19, 2005
2,341
112
63
41
#15
WOWMac-a-docious, you got any proof about that european statistic,if you were to say crime i would belive you,but the use of guns, in crimes ,committed annualy in europe would never even have a chance agaisnt american gun crimes.Now if were talkin bout Russia or Asia,thats a whole differnt story,but it still be hard to belive they out did the USA.fuckin square ass retards can get a hold of a fuckin small hand gun around your aread,that aint right,a rotten apple ruins the whole batch.
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#18
DeceptaKhan said:
WOWMac-a-docious, you got any proof about that european statistic,if you were to say crime i would belive you,but the use of guns, in crimes ,committed annualy in europe would never even have a chance agaisnt american gun crimes.Now if were talkin bout Russia or Asia,thats a whole differnt story,but it still be hard to belive they out did the USA.fuckin square ass retards can get a hold of a fuckin small hand gun around your aread,that aint right,a rotten apple ruins the whole batch.
That is the point I'm making, when I said the #'s are astonishing I meant because America has so many, while places in Europe with anti gun laws have so few. It's an obvious equation...less guns = less gun violence.
 
Oct 10, 2005
979
1
0
39
#19
i think it is somewhat a good thing cuz too many young niggaz are crazy nowadays and carry them heaters jus to survive...its fuckin ridiculous
 
May 4, 2002
10,362
20,636
113
#20
like someone said earlier, this only effects "legal and honest " gun owners. fact is most guns on the street are dirty and very easy to get. which means now only criminals will be armed, that isnt good for store owners.