SAN FRANCISCO FIRST TO HAVE GAY MARRIAGES

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 28, 2003
899
38
0
45
#1
SAN FRANCISCO_—_San Francisco officials presided over the marriages of at least 15 same-sex couples Thursday and issued about a dozen more marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples.


The act of civil disobedience was a political and legal challenge to California law. It pre-empted the efforts of the_Campaign for California Families_to block Mayor Gavin Newsom's plan to license_same-sex marriages . A spokesman for the group vowed it would file an injunction request Friday and characterized Thursday's marriages as a sham. "These unlawful certificates are not worth the paper they are printed on. The renegade mayor of San Francisco has no authority to do this," said Randy Thomasson, the group's executive director. "This is nothing more than a publicity stunt that disrespects our state law and system of government itself." Longtime lesbian activists_Phyllis Lyon , 79, and_Del Martin , 83, were the first to be married. San Francisco Assessor Mabel Teng wed them at 11:10 a.m. PST_in a closed-door civil ceremony at City Hall, mayor's spokesman Peter Ragone said. The two have been a couple for 51 years. It remains unclear what practical value their marriage license will have, but the symbolism was self-evident on a day when lawmakers in Massachusetts were debating a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage but legalize civil unions. Thursday's marriages defy a ballot measure California voters approved in 2000 that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. State lawmakers subsequently passed a domestic partner law that, when it goes into effect in 2005, will offer the most generous protections to gays and lesbians outside Vermont. San Francisco officials insisted Thursday that the licenses were legally binding. "Today a barrier to true justice has been removed," the mayor said in a statement. Campaign for California Families has sued, so far unsuccessfully, to block the state's domestic partner law, which Gov. Gray Davis signed in September. That law expands the rights of gay couples in areas ranging from health coverage and parental status to property ownership and funeral arrangements. On Thursday, San Francisco City Hall was crowded with jubilant same-sex couples. The vows in one of the marriages, performed before television cameras, replaced the traditional phrasing take each other as "husband and wife" with "spouse for life."
Meanwhile, about 30 couples crowded outside the San Francisco County Clerk's office awaiting licenses, many arm in arm. One of the women, wearing a white wedding dress and veil, encouraged couples to shout out their names and how long they had been together. Before the crowds arrived, the elderly couple said after the brief morning ceremony that they were going home to rest and didn't plan anything to celebrate. Still, it was a profound moment for the pair, veterans of decades of gay rights struggles. "Why shouldn't we" be able to marry, Lyon asked. Mayor Newsom was not present at the morning ceremony but later presented Martin and Lyon with a signed copy of the state constitution with sections related to equal rights highlighted. The two official witnesses were Kate Kendell, director of the_National Center for Lesbian Rights and former city official Roberta Achtenberg. The Associated Press_contributed to this report.
 
¤

¤bigbOOtyjenn¤

Guest
#2
DAMN.........WHAT A GREAT TOPIC I CHOSE TO HAVE A DEBATE ON!

I'M VERY HAPPY FOR THOSE WHO GOT MARRIED TODAY BUT FUCKERS WANNA NOW RUIN IT.......*SMH*

PEOPLE CANT JUST BE HAPPY.......SO THOSE WHO ARENT MAKE THE ONES THAT ARE MISERABLE.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#4
Mclean, if a man, a dog, and a fire hydrant, want to get married, and they love each other, who are you to take away that right? You're just a big Republican! If two or three people, places, or things, have feelings for each other, who are you to come in and say "hey, that's not right!"
 
Jun 28, 2003
899
38
0
45
#5
BECUZ REPUBLICANS THINK THEYRE SPEAKING FOR GOD....CUZ THEY SURE AS HELL DONT KNOW SHIT ABOUT FAMILY VALUES...NEED I ITEMIZE ALL THE GOP CONGRESSMEN WHO HAVE HAD BOOTY CALLS BEHIND THEIR WIVES BACKS? LOL
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#8
If gays only knew what married life is really like, they'd be runnin from it LOL!

It ain't the first time they do this, ya'll remember when gay men started complaining about the military denying them?
You want equal rights Mr. extremely happy man? Go on, be all you can be and then get blown up into pieces hahahaha....
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#9
WHITE DEVIL said:
Mclean, if a man, a dog, and a fire hydrant, want to get married, and they love each other, who are you to take away that right? You're just a big Republican! If two or three people, places, or things, have feelings for each other, who are you to come in and say "hey, that's not right!"
Come on man, would you really support the marriage between some guy and his dog?
What about the dogs rights? That's animal abuse.

Oh yeah, no one should vandelize fire hydrants. They are city property and are protected by the local fire code....
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#16
You can get married via drive through windows, but gays getting married is ruining the institution. ROFL, Mcnugget you need to be slapped in the face by a 2 by 4....
 
May 5, 2002
3,499
34
0
47
www.karliehustle.com
#17
But remember Snub, "God" says gay marriage is wrong. And everyone who uses that defense is a church-going, commandment-abiding citizen that would never EVER use religion only when it was convenient in their lives.

Period point blank, people use the bible and God when it fits their situation to do so. Otherwise when they are fucking that prostitute or stealing from their job all of a sudden it's "God who"?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#19
Sergeant Hustle said:
But remember Snub, "God" says gay marriage is wrong. And everyone who uses that defense is a church-going, commandment-abiding citizen that would never EVER use religion only when it was convenient in their lives.

Period point blank, people use the bible and God when it fits their situation to do so. Otherwise when they are fucking that prostitute or stealing from their job all of a sudden it's "God who"?
That's exactly what I'm saying.

"God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve!" Statements like this just show how ignorant these christians are. Their mentality is still stuck in the dark ages. It's no wonder prejedice still exists today.