ROLLIN' STONES

[EDJ]

MAN, I READ THIS ARTICLE IN ROLLIN' STONES THAT WAS DISTURBIN'. I USUALLY DON'T READ ROLLIN' STONES OR N-E PRE-DOMINANT MAIN-STREAM MAgAZINE BUT I HAD TO WAIT FOR A PUNK ASS COMPUTER AT THE LIBRARY.

N-E-WAY,
I READ AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DETECTIVE WHO BUSTS CHESTERS(CHILD MOLESTERS) ONLINE AND POSES AS ONE OR AS A CHILD WANTIN' TO gET AT THESE FOOLS. THE ARTICLE WAS gRAPHIC AND IT SPOKE UP ON HOW SOME CHILDREN PROSTITUTE THEMSELVES FOR THESE FOOLS. MAN, IT WAS TOO MUCH INFORMATION, ESPECIALLY FOR A MUSIC MAgAZINE. I REALLY BELIEVE SOME OF THE EDITORS OF THE MAgAZINE CONDONE THE ACT OR gET A KIK OUT OF IT.

WHAT YAW THINK? HAS N-E-BODY READ THAT SHIT?

 

[WHITE DEVIL]

Nah...I'll check the shit out if I see it.

 

[Ethereal]

I USUALLY DON'T READ ROLLIN' STONES OR N-E PRE-DOMINANT MAIN-STREAM MAgAZINE

Why don't you just say "white" magazine instead of "PRE-DOMINANT MAIN-STREAM MAgAZINE"?

I REALLY BELIEVE SOME OF THE EDITORS OF THE MAgAZINE CONDONE THE ACT OR gET A KIK OUT OF IT.

Why do you think that? What do you know about these editors?

As for the topic -- I give my praises to the authorities for their effort to stop molestation and child prostitution, as well as the editors for puting it out in the open. Maybe some of these pedophiles will read the article and know what awaits them.

 

[askG]

MAN, IT WAS TOO MUCH INFORMATION, ESPECIALLY FOR A MUSIC MAgAZINE. I REALLY BELIEVE SOME OF THE EDITORS OF THE MAgAZINE CONDONE THE ACT OR gET A KIK OUT OF IT.

i dont think thats accurate...if anything it was probably a way of including as much info on the subject for the readers...an in depth article ya digs...nowadays its common for prime time tv shows like law and order svu to go into detail with storys about child molestation and other similar things...i havent read it but i think you might be making too much of it right there...could you put up a link to the article maybe?

 

[WHITE DEVIL]

I think they were trying to fuck wit you by giving too much info in order to hopefully disgust people.

 

[phil]

they have one of those units around here. theres like 15 cops that do nothing but sit on the net all die posing as 14year old girls luring dudes from out of state.

 

[Cheeze]

To me the article was a scare tactic. They were pointing out how a lot of these people are addicted to that shit and need to stop or get thrown in jail. And always raise awareness to people to watch out for that shit when their kids are surfing the net. I think they were so graphic was to stir up people's thoughts on the issue, like we are doing here.

 

[m.w.merlino]

wheres the parents at??

 

[askG]

^^
no shit...i remember whwn i used to have aol...id go into the chat rooms and thered be 13 yr old kids coming in the room declaring themselves "sexy lil momma lookin for a sexy man"...lmao...wtf are we to expect.

 

[EDJ]

NITRO,
YOU STRESSED, "Why don't you just say "white" magazine instead of "PRE-DOMINANT MAIN-STREAM MAgAZINE"?"

CAUSE THE MAgAZINE AIN'T WHITE, AND IT WOULD BE IgNORANT FOR ME TO JUST ASSUME THAT AIN'T NOBODY THAT'S BLAK INVOLVED IN THE PUBLICATION AND CIRCULATION OF THE MAgAZINE. THE MAgAZINE APPEALS TO MAINSTREAM SOCIETY ABOUT PREDOMINANT MAINSTREAM MUSIC, WHETHA THEY BE WHITE OR OTHA.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "Why do you think that? What do you know about these editors?"

FOR ONE, I KNOW THEY gOT gRAPHIC AT A TOPIC THAT WAS NOT NEEDED TO gET gRAPHIC ABOUT TO MAKE THEY POINT.

TWO(K),
I DON'T KNOW NONE OF THE EDITORS OR CARE TO. I JUST KNOW THE ARTICLE HAD TOO MUCH UNNECESSARY CONTENT.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "As for the topic -- I give my praises to the authorities for their effort to stop molestation and child prostitution, as well as the editors for puting it out in the open. Maybe some of these pedophiles will read the article and know what awaits them."

I THINK THEY COULD CARE LESS.

BROWNMASK,

YOU STRESSED, "i dont think thats accurate...if anything it was probably a way of including as much info on the subject for the readers...an in depth article ya digs..."

TOO MUCH INDEPTH. SOME OF THAT SHIT YOU DON'T SPEAK, WHEN THE POINT IS ALREADY MADE. YOU DON'T BLUNTLY SPEAK ABOUT THE VIEWS OF THE PREDATOR AND HOW THEY gOT CAUgHT WITH A DILDO UP THEY ASS WHILE WATCHIN' CHILDREN NAKED AND JACCIN' OFF. YOU DON'T RECOUNTER EXPERIENCES AND SPEAK WHAT WAS SPOKEN EXPLICITLY WHEN THE SAME POINT CAN BE MADE. IT'S LIKE TALKIN' TO A FAg EXPLICITLY TO ABOUT SOME DIK AND SEX AND YOU AIN'T EVEN gAY.


THEN YOU STRESSED, "nowadays its common for prime time tv shows like law and order svu to go into detail with storys about child molestation and other similar things..."

AND THEN YOU WONDER WHY THIS SOCIETY IS FUCCED UP AND HOW CHILDREN gET IDEAS FROM T.V? JUST CAUSE THE T.V MAKES IT COMMON FOR SOMETHIN, DOES IT MAKE IT O.K?

THEN YOU STRESSED, "i havent read it but i think you might be making too much of it right there...could you put up a link to the article maybe?"

JUST FOR YOU www.rollingstones.com NOW SEARCH FOR THE MARCH ISSUE OR gO TO THEY SEARCH ENgINE.

PHIL,

YOU STRESSED, "they have one of those units around here. theres like 15 cops that do nothing but sit on the net all die posing as 14year old girls luring dudes from out of state."

THEY WAS TALKIN' BOUT LIL BOYS UNDER THE AgE OF 10 AND OLD ASS gRANDPA'S SEDUCIN' THEM AND gOIN' INTO DETAIL ABOUT THEM. 14 YEAR OLD FEMALES ARE ALMOST WOMEN. BIg DIFFERENCE.

 

[phil]

oh, i was just adding to the discussion, but damn i didnt know thats what was going down. i know what you mean though edj, i dont like reading or seeing that shit let alone having details and such.

 

[EDJ]

^WHAT BOTHERS ME MORE IS FOO'S ACTUALLY WANTIN' DETAILS ABOUT IT AND DEFENDIN' THAT POINT.

 

[Ethereal]

CAUSE THE MAgAZINE AIN'T WHITE, AND IT WOULD BE IgNORANT FOR ME TO JUST ASSUME THAT AIN'T NOBODY THAT'S BLAK INVOLVED IN THE PUBLICATION AND CIRCULATION OF THE MAgAZINE. THE MAgAZINE APPEALS TO MAINSTREAM SOCIETY ABOUT PREDOMINANT MAINSTREAM MUSIC, WHETHA THEY BE WHITE OR OTHA.

If thats the case, then I would say hip-hop is predominant mainstream music. Just reflect on the numbers and ratings of rock and rap, then tell me which is bigger and more fluent to consumers.

FOR ONE, I KNOW THEY gOT gRAPHIC AT A TOPIC THAT WAS NOT NEEDED TO gET gRAPHIC ABOUT TO MAKE THEY POINT.

The more graphic they are, the more the reader is despised of child molestors. I don't see anything wrong with making pedophiles look like human waiste. There are people catching these pedophiles, posing as prey, then you have a magazine telling the readers about it, and your opposing it. Hmmmm.

I THINK THEY COULD CARE LESS.

Because you know them so well right? You read one article and your saying you think they don't care, how do you know? I think the fact they they published the article tells it all. They obviously care more then you.

WHAT BOTHERS ME MORE IS FOO'S ACTUALLY WANTIN' DETAILS ABOUT IT AND DEFENDIN' THAT POINT.

1. "Foo's" want details because you were not specific about the details in your topic.

2. What point is there to defend?

3. What bothers me the most is that someone who is supposidley repulsed by this article sure had no problem reading through the entire thing. Were you required to read through it? Was it the only page in the magazine? No, but you chose the article about molestation, that shit is bothering.

 

[EDJ]

NITRO,
NOW I CLEARLY SEE THAT YOU OPPOSE ME TO SIMPLY OPPOSE ME THAN TO ACTUALLY CHOP THE SHIT UP. YOU SOUND LIKE AN EMOTIONAL WREK.

BUT YOU STRESSED, "If thats the case, then I would say hip-hop is predominant mainstream music. Just reflect on the numbers and ratings of rock and rap, then tell me which is bigger and more fluent to consumers."

I WOULD SAY IN THIS TIME AND AgE SINCE THE BIg CORPORATIONS gOT TO THE MUSIC, YES. BUT THEN AgAIN YOU CAN'T SINgLE RAP OUT, AND LABEL IT CAUSE THERE'S SOME MANY gENRE'S OF RAP NOW THAT, IT AIN'T ALL THE SAME MUSIC. CAUSE PERSONALLY, I DON'T LISTEN TO WHAT'S ON THE RADIO OR WHAT'S TARgETTED TO MAINSTREAM AUDIENCES.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "The more graphic they are, the more the reader is despised of child molestors."

ONLY A CLUELESS MUTHA-FUKA WOULD SAY THAT OR ACT LIKE THAT. WE CAN ONLY IMAgINE WHAT THESE SIK FUKS DO OR NOT EVEN CARE TO DO SO. SO THE MORE gRAPHIC THEY ARE IN MY EYES, THE MORE TOLERANT THEY ARE TO ENVISION SUCH ACT(S).

THEN YOU STRESSED, "I don't see anything wrong with making pedophiles look like human waiste."

SO YOU SAYIN' YOU DIDN'T HAVE A CLUE THE CHILD MOLESTER'S ARE HUMAN WASTE? SO YOU SAYIN' THAT A MAgAZINE THAT'S ABOUT MUSIC HAD TO BRINg AN ARTICLE UP AND BE SO gRAPHIC WITH IT SO YOU COULD UP THE NOTION?

THEN YOU STRESSED, "There are people catching these pedophiles, posing as prey, then you have a magazine telling the readers about it, and your opposing it. Hmmmm."

ONCE AgAIN, YOUR ASSUMPTIVE BEHAVIOR HAS LED TO YOUR IgNORANCE. I DON'T OPPOSE THE MAgAZINE MAKIN' AN ARTICLE TO THE TOPIC OR PEOPLE CATCHIN' THESE SIK FUKS. WHAT I'M OPPOSED TO IS TO THE DETAIL AND gRAPHIC NATURE OF WHAT MUTHA-FUKAS WAS TALKIN' ABOUT. IT'S LIKE IF THERE'S AN ARTICLE ON gAYS(LET'S SAY MAN ON MAN) AND THEY START TALKIN' BOUT ALL THE DETAILS OF A HOMOSEXUAL FLINg AND COMMENTIN' ON THE ACT, LIKE IT WAS ACTUALLY HAPPEN, SECOND BY SECOND, HOPIN' TO ENTICE THE READER. THAT'S HOW THESE FOOO'S WERE gETTIN' IN MY EYES.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "Because you know them so well right? You read one article and your saying you think they don't care, how do you know? I think the fact they they published the article tells it all. They obviously care more then you."

YOUR DADDY MUST RUN THE ROLLIN' STONES. BUT I WAS TALKIN' ABOUT THE PEDOPHILES CARIN' LESS IF THE ARTICLE WAS gRAPHIC OR NOT, PUBLISHED OR NOT. THEY gONNA DO WHAT THEY gONNA DO. NEXT TIME QUIT JUMPIN' THE gUN DUMB CUZZ.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "1. "Foo's" want details because you were not specific about the details in your topic."

THAT'S THE POINT TO MY ARgUMENT. THE ARTICLE HAD TOO MANY DETAILS. WHY SHOULD I REPEAT TO SOMETHIN' I'M AgAINST?

THEN YOU STRESSED, "2. What point is there to defend?"

CLUELESS WHITE CUZZ. WATCH OUT THERE NOW. YOU DEFENDIN' ROLLIN' STONES AND IT'S EDITORS FOR gETTIN' gRAPHIC ABOUT CHILD MOLESTATION, LIKE YOU CONDONIN' THE ACT, EVEN WORSE, THE SPECIFICS OF THE ACT.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "3. What bothers me the most is that someone who is supposidley repulsed by this article sure had no problem reading through the entire thing."

HOW YOU KNOW I DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM? LET ME gIVE YOU A CLUE. I DID. I EVEN MADE A THREAD ABOUT IT, DUMB-ASS.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "Were you required to read through it? Was it the only page in the magazine? No, but you chose the article about molestation, that shit is bothering."

I KNOW THAT IT'S IN YOUR NATURE TO BE SARCASTIC, BUT YOU NEED TO CUT THE ASSUMPTIVE BEHAVIOR THAT COMES ALONg WITH IT. IT REALLY BRINgS OUT YOUR IgNORANCE. YOU ACT LIKE I KNEW THAT ARTICLE EXISTED IN A MUSIC MAgAZINE THAT I USUALLY DON'T READ AND I WENT STRAIgHT TO IT. OF COURSE I READ OTHA PARTS OF THE MUTHA-FUKA, BUT I'M NOT HERE TO PRONMOTE THAT MAgAZINE. IT JUST BOTHERED ME THAT A MUSIC MAgAZINE WOULD gO INTO DETAIL ABOUT A TOPIC THAT IS NOT MUSIC RELATED. NEXT TIME gET IT RIgHT.