^Well, from a socio based standpoint he has a responsibility to deliver his message effectively and creating unsuspecting enemies in the process doesn't help his cause. People are taken back by this type of approach as it is unwarranted. "The Enemies of Reason"? I mean the guy is a drama queen, c'mon, it isn't that serious, people are just having fun with the freedom they posses. If he believes in a soul or not, the guy definitely doesn't have one, he is the prophet of gloom. A finger pointer, an interloper, a destroyer of culture.
I honestly agree with a lot of what he says, I watched the video earlier. It wasn't too bad, but it is the way he goes about a lot of things. He creates the illusion that belief in anything that his "reason" can't come to terms with is an affront to civilization as we know it. To the contrary, civilization didn't start in Britain or America, and we have survived for thousands of years off culture, instinct, and basic common sense. Science has helped more than it has hurt, I agree, but imagination is what got us here in the first place and kept us alive and mentally/psychologically stable. You actually have to entertain possibilities before you can verify them also, which involves imagination and sometimes faith (that what you believe can and will be verified).
We know that deeply involved scientists usually are found to be at the bottom of the social latter. Large segments of society reject science for that very reason; lack of sociability. We are social animals and a world devoid of imagination and belief is a world devoid of society and only of competition. He needs to learn how to bridge the gap between reason and belief/imagination..