pure genius..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#2
Your calling Michael Savage Genius?!?!?!?!

The guy is a piece of shit!

You right wing nuts have no shame. I know the people on this board (Mclean/Knuckles/phil and others) are so stupid that they will listen to all the crap these piece of shit talk show hosts spew. But what scares me is that some of the people doing the manipulating in the right-wing media (and there is no left-wing media, by the way) know exactly what they are doing, as do those in power. They are cynical, ugly, dangerous, and ultimately violent people, interested in power at any cost, racist to the core, and lacking any human decency.

I hope you seriously dont sponsor this Michael savage character.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#4
Knucklez said:
"..liberalism is a mental disorder that has undermined our families, our society and our national security." - Michael Savage
if u believe that u'r an idiot......Knucklez remember the other thread...u'r weak.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,373
2
0
39
#7
Lets compare the extremes of each group before we decide which is a "mental disorder":

Extreme liberals...tree huggers, animal rights groups, hippies.

Extreme conservatives...Ku Klux Klan, Neo Nazis, Aryan Nation.

Which is worse?
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#9
YoungVicious said:
Lets compare the extremes of each group before we decide which is a "mental disorder":

Extreme liberals...Nation Of Islam, animal rights groups (that blow up and kill people at McDonalds) , black panthers, WWP (world workers party), A.N.S.W.E.R. (which by the way is a commie organization)

Extreme conservatives...Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michael Reagan

Which is worse?
to me the liberals sound worse
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#12
2-0-Sixx said:
and there is no left-wing media
FOX NEWS LIBERALS

1. GREATA VAN SUSTREN
2. GERALDO RIVERA
3. MORT KONDRAKE
4. JUAN WILLIAMS
5. NEAL GABLER
6. SHEPARD SMITH
7. ALLEN COLMES

CNN LIBERALS

1. HARVILLE
2. CONNIE CHUNG
3. PAULA ZAUN

MSNBC LIBERALS

1. BILL PRESS
2. CHRIS MATTHEWS
3. PHIL DONAHUE

ABC LIBERALS

1. PETER JENNINGS
2. JOHN GIBSON
3. BARBARA WALTERS
4. STEPHANOPOLIS
5. SAM DONALDSON
6. COKIE ROBERTS

NBC LIBERALS

1. TOM BROKAW

CBS LIBERALS

1. DAN RATHER
2. AND READ BERNARD GOLDBERGS BOOK ITS AL ABOUT CBS AND THEIR LIBERAL TILT
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#17
Mcleanhatch said:


FOX NEWS LIBERALS

1. GREATA VAN SUSTREN
2. GERALDO RIVERA
3. MORT KONDRAKE
4. JUAN WILLIAMS
5. NEAL GABLER
6. SHEPARD SMITH
7. ALLEN COLMES

CNN LIBERALS

1. HARVILLE
2. CONNIE CHUNG
3. PAULA ZAUN

MSNBC LIBERALS

1. BILL PRESS
2. CHRIS MATTHEWS
3. PHIL DONAHUE

ABC LIBERALS

1. PETER JENNINGS
2. JOHN GIBSON
3. BARBARA WALTERS
4. STEPHANOPOLIS
5. SAM DONALDSON
6. COKIE ROBERTS

NBC LIBERALS

1. TOM BROKAW

CBS LIBERALS

1. DAN RATHER
2. AND READ BERNARD GOLDBERGS BOOK ITS AL ABOUT CBS AND THEIR LIBERAL TILT
people of the forums.....mcleanhatch is not backing his arguement
when he stats that the media is liberal.

the above stats nothing about the media being liberals, becuase
those are not the one who controll it. they just reported the "news"

if you want to understand the media, u have to look at its
institutions, the way its funded, who owns them, and the people
who edited what these people are allowed to say, etc.

BERNARD GOLDBERGS is an idiot for leaving off a lot of information
in this book....current examples are, why doesn't the media
report the opinions of those whose are against FTAA, or the
opinions of those in veneuzala that are pro-chavistas?...
those are two current issues that are reported to the
rightwing advantage.

if you want to know more about this subject, try two people
that have done the research and have done an acamediy, and
scholary research on the subject, unlike Goldbergs.
check this out

THE ILLIBERAL MEDIA
http://siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=44225
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#18
nefar559 said:
people of the forums.....mcleanhatch is not backing his arguement when he stats that the media is liberal.
Mcleanhatch said:
Take, for example, Professor McLaren's UCLA Of 13 journalism professors with an affiliation, 12 belong to a party of the left.
those are future journalists in the main-stream media
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#19
Mcleanhatch said:




those are future journalists in the main-stream media
if they are really liberal they wouldn't be on mainstream media


first of all this is the only fact the conservatives have in proving that the media is liberal......its so idiotic, and it doesn't prove anything.

if you want to understand how the media works, you don't
start with the reporters....u start at there instuitions, how they
are funded, look at the owers, and the editors...etc.

the arguement given above is like saying the workers at the
car factories are the ones making the descion on how to make
the car. or better yet, they don't have any say in how the company is ran, and how to design a car. they just build them, nothing else.

learn more
THE ILLIBERAL MEDIA
http://siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=44225

:-D