Police repress protesters at Democratic National Convention

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
By Tom Eley
27 August 2008


On Monday, police in riot gear used pepper spray, truncheons and rubber bullets on a peaceful demonstration of about 300 protesters about one mile from the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Around 100 demonstrators were arrested, charged with resisting a lawful order to disperse and obstruction of streets or public passageways.

At about 7 p.m. Monday, riot police fired pepper spray and pepper balls, which are delivered by guns, against the protesters, who had attempted to carry out a protest outside of the police-designated “free speech zone.” The free speech zone is a small area in a parking lot near the Pepsi Center, surrounded by two layers of steel fence and concrete barriers and topped by razor wire.

The confrontation began on a sidewalk near Denver’s Civic Center. SWAT police forced protesters backward, where a second phalanx of police was waiting, blocking their retreat. The police then completely surrounded the protesters, while reinforcements, including two armored vehicles, arrived. The protesters were held in this position for 90 minutes.

Twenty-one year old Joey Kenzie, a recent community college graduate, was among those surrounded by the riot police. “I’m a little in shock,” she told the Denver Post. “At one point we didn’t know what we were going to do, we were going to get arrested or maced. I haven’t been able to vote for a president yet, but this was an epiphany. My freedom of speech was suppressed.”

From among those pinned by the police, a protester was heard shouting, “This is not America. This is what a police state looks like. You’re worried about Beijing? This is repression.”

The Denver Police Department claims that the “crowd that had gathered near Civic Center Park refused requests to disperse and suddenly rushed a police safety line about 7:15 p.m.,” and that protesters were “carrying rocks and other items that could be used to threaten public safety.”

A legal observer for the People’s Law Project and the National Lawyers Guild disputed the police account. He observed no rocks or other projectiles in the hands of the protesters, and noted that they were complying with police orders to “move back” when the police fired pepper spray into the crowd. No order to disperse was given, and when protesters attempted to leave of their own accord, the police blocked their route.

Footage of the protest and the police intervention can be viewed on YouTube.

Police interned the arrested protesters at a makeshift prison composed of wire cages reminiscent of the US detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Denver has set up special “DNC” kangaroo courts to process the arrested protesters. However, it was not until nearly midnight on Monday that the first five protesters were arraigned—without attorneys—at the court dubbed “DNC 2.” Four of the five protesters were brought into the court tied together in twos, and they were compelled to enter pleas before the judge, Doris Burd, still linked together. The judge offered the prisoners the choice of entering a plea agreement with the city attorney, or pleading either guilty or innocent on the spot. Burd levied a $500 bond on the two protesters who pleaded not guilty.

Two men who had been arraigned and pleaded guilty—one of whom claimed to have been only a bystander—were interviewed in the courtroom by a reporter for the Rocky Mountain News. However, when the reporter tried to write their names down, a sheriff’s deputy ripped the reporter’s notebook out of his hands, removing the page with his notes, and threatened to remove him from the court. “You are never to speak to prisoners,” the deputy said.

The arrested protesters have been effectively denied legal representation. On Monday, attorneys for the People’s Law Project received requests for legal representation, but they did not know where the prisoners were located or when they would appear in court.

The police and security build-up in the lead-up to the DNC vividly demonstrates the precarious state of basic democratic rights in the US. Because the Department of Homeland Security has declared the nominating conventions “national security events”—a hazy legal status created by executive order under President Bill Clinton—the police of Denver have been transformed into a de facto military force and placed under the direction of the executive branch of the federal government.

The size of this police force has been doubled by the infusion of cops from surrounding areas, while numerous federal and state agencies have been mobilized to assist with security, including the Secret Service, which directs security operations, the National Guard, the Coast Guard, the US Customs and Border Protection agency, the Transportation Security Administration, the North American Aerospace Defense Command and the Pentagon’s Northern Command.

The level of security would suggest that DNC was a colonial administration meeting in hostile territory, rather then the nominating convention of a mass political party in a functioning democracy.

Moreover, the magnitude and ferocity of the security operation is completely out of proportion to the size and nature of the protests, which have been rather small and self-consciously peaceful. Sunday’s protest included about 3,000 people, while the protest attacked by police on Monday included no more than 300.

The militarization of Denver and the police repression of basic civil rights, which no leading Democratic Party politician has denounced, is the hysterical response of a political system that can allow no political expression outside of the narrowest official channels. It is meant to serve as a warning to those who would attempt to challenge the status quo, and also as a trial run for the sort of repression the ruling elite intends to mete out to the working class in the coming period.

Source
 
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#3
^^^
nevermind, from Rocky Mtn News a few days ago

Protesters share DNC plans with media
By Ashleigh Oldland, Rocky Mountain News (Contact)
Saturday, August 23, 2008
DENVER CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING - Convention protest groups held a news conference Saturday evening to share their demonstration schedule and plans with media.

Hoisting signs such as "Iraq: Get Out, Iran: Stay Out, Bush/Cheney: Drive Out" and "The world can't wait, drive out the Bush regime," the protesters didn't all match in point of view, but they all seem to agree that they plan to stand united in their protesting efforts during the convention.

Protest leaders said the groups will move together in the parade route by the Pepsi Center on Sunday.

Many groups got started with their efforts today. Several protesters with Recreate 68 began training today in human rights and self defense. And about 70 members of The World Can't Wait protest group held a protest outside of a Planned Parenthood.

Mark Cohen with Re-create 68 reaffirmed that the protesters are planning peaceful demonstrations.

"We have established a good relationship with Denver Police. They want to keep things peaceful and so do we," Cohen said.

Two dozen supporters, media and a documentary crew were at the news conference.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#4
So was it rubber bullets or was it pepper balls? There is a difference.

The opening line for skimming consumption says it was rubber bullets, but it is not mentioned anywhere else in the article, yet pepper balls are.

Every account I’ve read of this incident mentions the pepper balls, but there are no reliable sources to confirm rubber bullets.
 
Sep 28, 2002
1,124
4
0
#5
It seems like you couldn't pay for a 5 min story about this on a major media outlet.

They shoot those pepper balls out of paintball guns right if so then you can dodge them if your on your toes. A rubber bullet though?
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#6
I saw this covered on major media cable news yesterday/this morning (blends together I can't remember exact time or channel).

Shit would hurt if you got hit by a pepper ball, but not like a rubber bullet. Maybe we should shoot these protesters with rubber bullets ahead of time so they don't make up stories or "confuse' being shot with a paintball with a bullet?
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#8
Rubber bullet can easily kill you, hurts more, and leaves longer lasting effects than a pepper ball.

I'd take the pepper ball over the bullet any day. Not that pepper spray is any fun.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
37
#10
Stories like this don't really do much to make anybody sympathetic to their cause I think. They talkin about repression and trying to compare what happened to them to what happens to millions of people outside of the United States? Fuck that shit, most of them foos are privileged "intellectuals" who are gonna get a good ass job after they done with college and "liberalism" and can't live off of daddy's money no more, and become the next Rush Limbaughs.

The US exploits and fucks with other country's economies and governments to make the US a stronger nation. They protesting about Iraq, and not to go to Iran and that shit's cool with me. But there's laws about how to conduct a demonstrations and them foos broke em and the police did what the fuck the damn pigs do. Yeah, boo hoo them foos got pepper sprayed and put in "cages reminiscent of Guantanamo Bay". I fuckin hate when so called leftists do that shit, and try to compare what happens to them in America, to what happens to those who are actually repressed.
 
Apr 8, 2004
1,362
10
0
#12
Stories like this don't really do much to make anybody sympathetic to their cause I think. They talkin about repression and trying to compare what happened to them to what happens to millions of people outside of the United States? Fuck that shit, most of them foos are privileged "intellectuals" who are gonna get a good ass job after they done with college and "liberalism" and can't live off of daddy's money no more, and become the next Rush Limbaughs.

The US exploits and fucks with other country's economies and governments to make the US a stronger nation. They protesting about Iraq, and not to go to Iran and that shit's cool with me. But there's laws about how to conduct a demonstrations and them foos broke em and the police did what the fuck the damn pigs do. Yeah, boo hoo them foos got pepper sprayed and put in "cages reminiscent of Guantanamo Bay". I fuckin hate when so called leftists do that shit, and try to compare what happens to them in America, to what happens to those who are actually repressed.
I don't understand your point. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems as though you are saying that the repression of the Left in America is nothing compared to that of third world countries. What you are using is the comparative utility, its used in the case of Reparations for slavery as well, I'm pretty sure you've heard it before "Why, reparations? African-Americans are better off here than in Africa anyways", in other words its used to justifiy slavery and denial of reparations. An injustice is injustice, there are no "measuring sticks" when it comes to denying a human their basic rights, and as far as law there's a law that transcends man made laws. For example, there's no such thing as a "Free Speech Zone", however there is such a thing as called Free Speech. American's are just as repressed as those in other countries, just here it's more systematic and subtle, whearas in other places its more blunt and chaotic, but in practice does that mean one is worst than the other? We hear terms like "Freedom" "Democracy" "Social Mobility", but in reality they only apply to the privileged few because our system is designed that way. America says we are entitled to such things, as long as we stay in line, but once you step over that line they'll bring the force, all in the order to protect the status quo, to keep You and I in "our place".
 

BASEDVATO

Judo Chop ur Spirit
May 8, 2002
8,623
20,808
113
44
#16
how can you take case's like this to the supreme court? can they over-rule "homeland security?"

this is a obvious violation of American rights





*** not like we haven't been spraying protesters with high pressure fire hoses for years *****
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#17
That one that 20sixx had up where dude got knocked out the ring is what's up, he always has some good knockouts up though
My sigs are impregnable, and just ferocious. They want your heart. They want to eat his children. Praise be to Allah!

lol

I still think this Roy Jones one is my favorite, dude just gets flattened, looks up and sees the devil, haha
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
37
#20
I don't understand your point. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems as though you are saying that the repression of the Left in America is nothing compared to that of third world countries. What you are using is the comparative utility, its used in the case of Reparations for slavery as well, I'm pretty sure you've heard it before "Why, reparations? African-Americans are better off here than in Africa anyways", in other words its used to justifiy slavery and denial of reparations. An injustice is injustice, there are no "measuring sticks" when it comes to denying a human their basic rights, and as far as law there's a law that transcends man made laws. For example, there's no such thing as a "Free Speech Zone", however there is such a thing as called Free Speech. American's are just as repressed as those in other countries, just here it's more systematic and subtle, whearas in other places its more blunt and chaotic, but in practice does that mean one is worst than the other? We hear terms like "Freedom" "Democracy" "Social Mobility", but in reality they only apply to the privileged few because our system is designed that way. America says we are entitled to such things, as long as we stay in line, but once you step over that line they'll bring the force, all in the order to protect the status quo, to keep You and I in "our place".
I'm not saying that the repression of the left in America is nothing compared to third world countries, because the repression of the left in this country, Korea which is an industrialized country is far worse than in America. True, leftists are often targeted and imprisoned and sometimes beaten, and I'm not saying I condone that shit. I recognize that they're still being denied their basic rights; however, I was basically responding to quotes taken from the article. I was stating that I don't like when protestors get told to stay away from certain "boundaries" and then cross those boundaries and get arrested with smiles on their faces and then cry about how they're being repressed and that the world shouldn't worry about China. I think to compare what happened to these individuals specifically, to the human rights violations in China is ridiculous. You can say that injustice doesn't come with a measuring stick, but it definitely does when a white protestor who is probably in college living off of their parents money spends a day or a couple hours in jail and then states that he has been repressed worse than citizens of China. I know I'm generalizing a bit here, and maybe not all of that crowd was privileged white college students who don't really know why their protesting, but I tend to be a bit skeptical about many people who claim to be leftist. There are plenty of old conservatives with hella money that went through a "leftist" phase in college or high school.

And I was saying that in my opinion the rest of the public doesn't take these kids too seriously when they make statements about how the US is repressing them more so than the US represses other countries and other peoples. Now when a man is jailed for his political beliefs and his actual activism behind those beliefs, or a man is beat down or killed because of his color or religion or whatever, than I can hear him speak out on that and I can feel that and agree with that person. If the folks that was locked up for protesting in areas that the pigs said they couldn't protest, and then they kept it 100 and either tried to fight that legally or whatever without trying to compare themselves to other struggles, then I would've been able to get down with that. I can't get down with the fools that got arrested in this situation. Get it?