should phil jackson be considered one of the best nba coaches of all time? he has 9 rings so why not? people seem to be split on this, he's won all his rings with lots of talent. he had jordan and co. in chicago and now has kobe,shaq and co. in los angeles. would he be able to coach and team with less talent, like the pistons to the finals? Larry Brown has outcoached him since this series started. Phil has not been able to get his players to respond. Im leaning towards a "no" vote. i just think that he has inherited good teams