OPEN YOUR EYES

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#61
And if the E-Psychologist said it, then it must be true.

Nevermind the fact that he has not himself produced a single idea for helping lower the amount of Black on Black violence. I think we can all see that the true purpose of the thread was, obviously, Dirty Shoez' Psychological issues.


COCALEAFS said:
lets hear your intelegent take on loose change, or the NWO, if you have time that is....we all know what a hectic schedual your life can be.
These things do not matter. If they have as much power as you say they have, then there is no use complaining about them. The moment you say something true, you will have already spit out so much bullshit and ruined your credibility, that you probably wouldn't even know it.
 

Rasan

Producer
May 17, 2002
19,730
24,632
113
44
Chula Vista, South Bay, San Diego, California
#62
dirty shoez, can you explain these points:
we were lead to believe that the twin towers were decimated by airplanes..but in reality there were explosives in the building...
the planes that crashed into the twin towers were not commercial jets they were military jets...
the pentagon crash was staged..why is that?
and so was the crash in pennsylvania as well..that actually never happened...
why are there so many descrepancies? so many unanswered questions?
 

LISICKI

rosecityplaya
Dec 9, 2005
9,928
3,068
113
45
#63
Another predictable bullshit answer.

LOL

Either your gonna keep beating around the bush or your gonna get to the fuckin point.

I know your gonna beat around the bush.....

The American Government was responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent american people on 9-11 and is also responcible for the murder of thousands of innocant american and afgan/iraqi's.

Now if thats true, what bullshit did i spit out to ruin my credibility?

I dont think even you knew what the fuck your last vauge statement ment.

LOL
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#64
Dirty Shoez said:
Nevermind the fact that he has not himself produced a single idea for helping lower the amount of Black on Black violence.
Child, that was not my job. You had the burden of proof, and I gave you a logical reason why I did not have to provide a single idea for helping to lower black on black violence.

At everyone else he will continue to evade the question and give a vague response. This is part of his condition.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#65
HERESY said:
Child, that was not my job. You had the burden of proof, and I gave you a logical reason why I did not have to provide a single idea for helping to lower black on black violence.

At everyone else he will continue to evade the question and give a vague response. This is part of his condition.
So basically, you entered a thread to do nothing but argue, and not to contribute to the topic at hand. This is by your own admission. "Logical Reasons" do not take away from this obligation on your part.

"If any user is found posting multiple, meaningless replies that have little or nothing to do with the topic, you may be banned."

You are in direct violation of this provision.

"No insulting or attacking members without contributing to the topic or explaining why you’re insulting a member."

You violate the spirit of this provision as well by taking advantage of the 2nd `or' clause. You may well slip out of this one, but it is worth noting that if you read `or' to mean `and' (i.e., not as though the two are interchangeable), as it is intended here, you are in violation.

I am a Strict Constructionist as it relates to the RGGOM (Rules and Guidelines for the Gathering of the Minds), and you had better hope 2-0 isn't the same way, or you will have your warning and potentially be out of here.

I am opening up my trusty PM Box and snitching on you as we speak.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#66
Ra$an said:
dirty shoez, can you explain these points:
we were lead to believe that the twin towers were decimated by airplanes..but in reality there were explosives in the building...
the planes that crashed into the twin towers were not commercial jets they were military jets...
the pentagon crash was staged..why is that?
and so was the crash in pennsylvania as well..that actually never happened...
why are there so many descrepancies? so many unanswered questions?
I honestly feel sorry for you. Getting sucked into such a bullshit crowd, that only wants to suck you dry like all the rest. They'd Sheehan you in a second if you had a name. Its fortunate that you don't.


COCALEAFS said:
Another predictable bullshit answer.

LOL

Either your gonna keep beating around the bush or your gonna get to the fuckin point.

I know your gonna beat around the bush.....

The American Government was responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent american people on 9-11 and is also responcible for the murder of thousands of innocant american and afgan/iraqi's.

Now if thats true, what bullshit did i spit out to ruin my credibility?

I dont think even you knew what the fuck your last vauge statement ment.

LOL
...LOL.
 

LISICKI

rosecityplaya
Dec 9, 2005
9,928
3,068
113
45
#67
I guess i must have physcic powers as well cause i knew your reply would be non existant.

I'm glad i wasted my time cause for a second there I actually thought you might contribute something, anything....nothing.

But i already knew where you and caliman stand. Let me ask you this then, one last question for you to avoid. If its impossible to use a private cell phone that has service in a commercial airplane why can I now turn on the TV and watch the propaganda/movie of the week flight 93 where they do jus that.

And also why you gonna waste time snitching on Heresy, i mean we all know your a lil rat bastard an all but even you know thats gonna be a waste of time. Your not gonna get a rise outta anyone.

Maybe study a lil bit more science and buisiness and less language Rata.

LOL
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#68
So basically, you entered a thread to do nothing but argue, and not to contribute to the topic at hand. This is by your own admission. "Logical Reasons" do not take away from this obligation on your part.
I entered the thread before you and made contributions. I DID contribute to the topic by asking and answering your questions. What I did NOT do was provide an alternative resolution, and I explained WHY. You did not meet the burden of proof, this is a case of topicality and since you obviously did not proove your stock issue your case is not Prima Facia, so I win. I did not need to provide a resolution, junior.

"If any user is found posting multiple, meaningless replies that have little or nothing to do with the topic, you may be banned."
If you feel I have done this feel free to PM the mod and have him look over the thread.

"No insulting or attacking members without contributing to the topic or explaining why you’re insulting a member."

You violate the spirit of this provision as well by taking advantage of the 2nd `or' clause. You may well slip out of this one, but it is worth noting that if you read `or' to mean `and' (i.e., not as though the two are interchangeable), as it is intended here, you are in violation.
If you feel I have done this feel free to PM the mod and have him look over the thread.

I am a Strict Constructionist as it relates to the RGGOM (Rules and Guidelines for the Gathering of the Minds), and you had better hope 2-0 isn't the same way, or you will have your warning and potentially be out of here.

I am opening up my trusty PM Box and snitching on you as we speak.
:rolleyes: . Feel free to PM the mod.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#69
^^ That is quite alright. I am not you.

I know the difference between having a heated, meaningless exchange in one thread, and (ahem) following around and harassing people in multiple threads...kind of like you are doing right now, right here in this one.


COCALEAFS said:
I guess i must have physcic powers as well cause i knew your reply would be non existant.

I'm glad i wasted my time cause for a second there I actually thought you might contribute something, anything....nothing.

But i already knew where you and caliman stand. Let me ask you this then, one last question for you to avoid. If its impossible to use a private cell phone that has service in a commercial airplane why can I now turn on the TV and watch the propaganda/movie of the week flight 93 where they do jus that.

And also why you gonna waste time snitching on Heresy, i mean we all know your a lil rat bastard an all but even you know thats gonna be a waste of time. Your not gonna get a rise outta anyone.

Maybe study a lil bit more science and buisiness and less language Rata.

LOL
When was the last time you flew, and are you stupid? Its no more impossible to use a cell phone on a plane than it is to keep your laptop on during takeoff. It is discouraged and possibly subject to penalties, but it is far from impossible.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#70
^^ That is quite alright. I am not you.
Son, I have never sent a mod a pm snitching on anyone.

I know the difference between having a heated, meaningless exchange in one thread, and (ahem) following around and harassing people in multiple threads...kind of like you are doing right now, right here in this one.
Son, I believe I posted in this thread before you did. I did not follow you.

Have a good one! :)
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#72
HERESY said:
Son, I have never sent a mod a pm snitching on anyone.



Son, I believe I posted in this thread before you did. I did not follow you.

Have a good one! :)
`The man is passive-aggressive. Look at the Blacc on Blacc Violence thread and see for yourself. This is the second time I have correctly diagnosed him. Everything in bold applies to him.'

This question was not a response to anything. It was on its own. You noticed that I posted in this thread, so you then followed-up (i.e., you are following me) with this nonsense. Especially relevant is that you appeal to others to go check out another thread, and attempt to use this thread as evidence for your insult at the beginning of your post.

There is something you are afraid of here. I am not quite sure what it is yet, but I am going to find out.
 
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
40
#73
i dont mean to ride on anyones dick here but, heresy should not even be looked at about being banned..

however i 100% SUPPORT the BANNING of dirty shoez as, even in this thread he provides proof of not only, not contributing to the topic at hand nor answering any questions directly asked by other members, but he continues to barge in and accuse other members of breaking rules then wanting to turn them in for the same rules he breaks within this thread.....

dirty shoez, if you are going to stick your neck into a thread like this please take your own advice and stick to the topic at hand, otherwise sir, you are the one in violation of the rules. normally this is somthing i could careless about but seeings as how you are trying to enforce these rules as you break them i see it fit you learn how stupid you look.

now, if u have nothing to contribute, and cannot answer ANY questions concerning this thread, LEAVE. Simply LEAVE. keep your fucking ignorant ass the fuck out this thread...how hard is it? stop ruining threads...
 
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
40
#74
Dirty Shoez said:
`The man is passive-aggressive. Look at the Blacc on Blacc Violence thread and see for yourself. This is the second time I have correctly diagnosed him. Everything in bold applies to him.'

This question was not a response to anything..
First off, its a statement not a question. Second, this comment im pretty much positive is in regaurds to you AVOIDING questions in this thread. AND NOT ANSWERING A SINGLE DIRECT QUESTION PERIOD.

Dirty Shoez said:
It was on its own..
Read above...

Dirty Shoez said:
You noticed that I posted in this thread, so you then followed-up (i.e., you are following me) with this nonsense. Especially relevant is that you appeal to others to go check out another thread, and attempt to use this thread as evidence for your insult at the beginning of your post.
evidence of you corrupting a thread with you're personal agenda.

Dirty Shoez said:
`There is something you are afraid of here. I am not quite sure what it is yet, but I am going to find out.
whoa, internet detective to the rescue.....you're a joke.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#75
Cmoke said:
First off, its a statement not a question.
ques·tion Audio pronunciation of "question" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kwschn)
n.

1.
1. An expression of inquiry that invites or calls for a reply.
2. An interrogative sentence, phrase, or gesture.
2. A subject or point open to controversy; an issue.
3. A difficult matter; a problem: a question of ethics.
4. A point or subject under discussion or consideration.


Sorry. You are wrong. This is what you get for that you believe a word is only allow to have the 1 meaning.

Second, this comment im pretty much positive is in regaurds to you AVOIDING questions in this thread. AND NOT ANSWERING A SINGLE DIRECT QUESTION PERIOD.
You are not in a position to dictate whether or not someone is required to answer a question. You would be better off putting your question into statement form, and then asking the person if they agree.
 

LISICKI

rosecityplaya
Dec 9, 2005
9,928
3,068
113
45
#77
You cant use a cell phone on an airplane above the flying elevation. Cant make calls, cant text message cant recieve text or calls, you cannot get service up there, bottom line. Do your research on it and try it, I've tried it many times to no avail.

'im done wasting my time with the likes of you though, your obviously too scary to provide an explaination or even insight to your mistaken point of view.

My intelligence and experience is far superior to yours
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#79
Cmoke said:
your still not contributing to the thread.
And you scolding me for 5+ posts, for not contributing to this thread, contributes WHAT EXACTLY to this thread?

Heresy is being a scoundrel and making fallacious claims.
I am defending my good honor and going on the offensive.
You are playing the Cop-Detective.

Do you not realize how much fun can be had here if you would stop acting like such a twat? Imagine the laughs and enjoyment that might be shared! It is a cheerful reflection indeed.


Which reminds me--STFU and get off my dick. Go play somewhere, I'm busy.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
40
www.myspace.com
#80
COCALEAFS said:
You cant use a cell phone on an airplane above the flying elevation. Cant make calls, cant text message cant recieve text or calls, you cannot get service up there, bottom line. Do your research on it and try it, I've tried it many times to no avail.

'im done wasting my time with the likes of you though, your obviously too scary to provide an explaination or even insight to your mistaken point of view.

My intelligence and experience is far superior to yours
Did u ever no that ure my hero?

Ure everything I wished I could beeeeeeeeee