OFFICIAL FLAT FUCKING EARTH THREAD

[Fucky McFuckerson]

Lmao "its photoshopped but it has to be"

Thats the quote.
If nasa says that, then i should believe it right?
Just how the dude said what retarded shit he was referencing when he said earth was flat on tv, HE SAID IT HAD TO DO WITH A BOOK. So it must be true. This fools says it himself its fake, so what does that mean?
Or are you ignorant enough to say the photo he says is fake, is real?

*sigh*

I wish i believed in deity's so i could pray for you. You are pretty fuckin dumb, dude.

Once you snap out of this phase in your life, i expect you to come back here and apologize too all of us who tried to help you.

 

[Fucky McFuckerson]

Still waiting on a FE model that actually works correctly. Yet, one has yet to surface from any FEer, even guys like Dubay. You know why? Because it wont work.

And why has no FEer gone to the tip of South America, and flew a balloon up 100,000 feet to view this ice wall you all seem to think exists? Because it doesnt exist, and would destroy your life and realize you are all idiots.

 

[Smiley650Agony]

*sigh*

I wish i believed in deity's so i could pray for you. You are pretty fuckin dumb, dude.

Once you snap out of this phase in your life, i expect you to come back here and apologize too all of us who tried to help you.

So youre just gonna ignore the proof i have for you that in this upcoming eclipse the shadow thats casted to the earth from it is moving in the opposite direction it should be therefore proving earth is not moving..

You just keep bringing up shit that has nothing to do with an eclipses shadow. Wether the sun sets or not is a different argument. Right now im asking you to explain how that shadow is even possible.
If you cant, dont write a paragraph exlaining how a sun sets when im asking about eclipses.

This eclipse proves a NON MOVING earth. Not that its flat or anything else. We dont. Move

 

[siccmadesyko]

In your flat earth model how do you explain days of darkness/light at the poles during solstice

 

[siccmadesyko]

2 models in the flat earth community attempting to explain Lunar eclipses. One school says that there is an unknown object which occasionally gets between the Sun and the Moon. The other school says that the Moon shines by its own light and that any variation in that light is part of a, presumably very carefully controled, variation in whatever is causing the shine. Both explanations are, of course, wrong.

The first fails because we know the Moon is about 0.4 Million Km away, and as discussed above, the Sun is 149.6 Million Km away, they can't be in nice convenient positions above the “disk” and anything coming between them would not explain why the Moon is full prior to being eclipsed. Whereas, of course, if it is on the other side of a spherical Earth then the Earth itself can, and indeed *is* the mister ions object in the middle.

The second fails because we can see shadows on the Moon and amazingly they point exactly the same direction as they would if they were cast by sunlight. Occam’s razor leads us to the inevitable conclusion that they *are* shadows caused by sunlight because the alternative is that the Moon is a giant artifact created by some god or super intelligent race covered in computer controlled LEDs or something deliberately designed to fool us into thinking it was reflecting sunlight.

 

[timebomb]

Look the earth is a fucking Sphere . Lol

 

[Smiley650Agony]

Look at the fake earth pictures its a fucking Sphere . Lol

shit like this makes me pissed that we were forced this belief without choosing what makes more sense.

Did you know there was pictures of Earth from space 100 years before we were even out there, and they look just like the blue marble picture, seems to me like they made up their mind on how the earth is supposed to look and kept it that way.

You have to be thousands of miles up in space to even see the whole earth. but somehow we did it in the 1800s...

19th century

seems like "it was a sphere" before we ever even saw.

 

[Smiley650Agony]

2 models in the flat earth community attempting to explain Lunar eclipses. One school says that there is an unknown object which occasionally gets between the Sun and the Moon. The other school says that the Moon shines by its own light and that any variation in that light is part of a, presumably very carefully controled, variation in whatever is causing the shine. Both explanations are, of course, wrong.

The first fails because we know the Moon is about 0.4 Million Km away, and as discussed above, the Sun is 149.6 Million Km away, they can't be in nice convenient positions above the “disk” and anything coming between them would not explain why the Moon is full prior to being eclipsed. Whereas, of course, if it is on the other side of a spherical Earth then the Earth itself can, and indeed *is* the mister ions object in the middle.

The second fails because we can see shadows on the Moon and amazingly they point exactly the same direction as they would if they were cast by sunlight. Occam’s razor leads us to the inevitable conclusion that they *are* shadows caused by sunlight because the alternative is that the Moon is a giant artifact created by some god or super intelligent race covered in computer controlled LEDs or something deliberately designed to fool us into thinking it was reflecting sunlight.

still doesn't explain why the shadow that is being casted down on to earth on the upcoming solar eclipse is going opposite the direction in which the earth is moving and spinning.

 

[Smiley650Agony]

In your flat earth model how do you explain days of darkness/light at the poles during solstice

Ive been explained that. The sun either travels on the Equator, Tropic of Cancer or Tropic of Capricorn.

when its on the tropic of Cancer its going to be more "light" on the North pole obviously because it has a smaller path around the earth on that tropic, there go your months of no nights.

Then its opposite when the sun is over the Tropic of Capricorn because it is at its furthest path around the north pole.

heres how the tropics look in the globe.

 

[StillHustlin]

 

[GTS]

regardless of the correct answer
you will die and pay taxes
i would worry about the shit going on here on earth then space

 

[Smiley650Agony]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88So6i0-YHQ

All of Nasas shit is bullshit.
heres an interview of the guys who landed the "Mars Curiosity Rover on Mars!"

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-kUH942awQ&t=45s[/ame]

their main engineer doesn't answer shit and asks for 3 fake people in the audience to answer the questions directed at him.

Heres NASA astronauts not being able to keep a straight lie.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmcwW-8CC6E&t=112s[/ame]

these dumbasses make a living "in space" but don't know if you can see stars or not in space

 

[StillHustlin]

All of Nasas shit is bullshit.
*All other nonsense removed from quote*

Cool story bro

I didn't post a NASA vid

 

[Smiley650Agony]

Cool story bro

I didn't post a NASA vid

On 28 May 2014, ESA astronaut Alexander Gerst and NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman under the command of Russian cosmonaut Maxim Suraev rocketed into space in a Soyuz spacecraft. This was their voyage.


yes, yes you did.

 

[StillHustlin]

Twitter

 

[StillHustlin]

On 28 May 2014, ESA astronaut Alexander Gerst and NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman under the command of Russian cosmonaut Maxim Suraev rocketed into space in a Soyuz spacecraft. This was their voyage.


yes, yes you did.

ESA is not NASA, GENIUS.
See logo in top left of vid, Stevie.
No, no I didn't:dead:

 

[Smiley650Agony]

ESA is not NASA, GENIUS.
See logo in top left of vid, Stevie.
No, no I didn't:dead:

So there just happens to be a NASA astronaut in the video with them.
I get that its not a NASA PRESENTED video, but if NASA is in it, Why would I trust it.
Why did they have to include a NASA astronaut? Can Russia, Paris and France not do it themselves?
LMAO


So there you have it. Russia, Paris and France are connected with the US in the Space Programs.

 

[timebomb]

shit like this makes me pissed that we were forced this belief without choosing what makes more sense.

Did you know there was pictures of Earth from space 100 years before we were even out there, and they look just like the blue marble picture, seems to me like they made up their mind on how the earth is supposed to look and kept it that way.

You have to be thousands of miles up in space to even see the whole earth. but somehow we did it in the 1800s...

19th century

seems like "it was a sphere" before we ever even saw.

im now convinced your fully Autistic or have some sort of learning disability...

 

[Smiley650Agony]

im now convinced your fully Autistic or have some sort of learning disability...

Lmao I can say the same for you guys.
But I aint mad at you for not seeing it my way.
You guys need to understand that your remedial way of looking into this is topic preventing you from seeing this, There are two ways that the "solar system" can work and that is a FACT.

Either the SUN is the center of it all (Im not going to go into Freemasonic Sun Worship) and it works the way All of you ASSUME it does (Because you're indoctrinated with all this bullshit)

OR

The Earth is the center of it all.


If they can't prove shit. Einstein couldn't help out with the Michelson Morley experiment to prove Earth was EVEN MOVING and Michelson even won a Nobel prize for not proving SHIT.

“The glory which is built upon a lie soon becomes a most unpleasant incumbrance. … How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!”

 

[GTS]

i don't believe the government or nasa on much and i commend you for looking for answers
but you can't buy or cheat time
that is the one thing rich people can't beat
don't waste your TIME on this earth, you can't get it back

your questions answer won't bring you food, water, money, love, happiness

truth is like poetry, and most people fucking hate poetry