Nuclear war possible in our lifetime?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#1
Say within the next 20-30 years. I think it's highly probable. Just look at the proliferation of technology, the internet...etc. Hostility towrads U.S.A. I think it's all building up to WWIII.
 
#3
HERESY said:
according to Bush ww3 has already started.
The globalists call the Cold War WWIII. They are called the War on Terrorism/Global War on Terrorism/The Long War/whatever they call this week WWIV.

But I certainly hope not. Although the current crop of criminal nut jobs in power has been itching to nuke someone for at least 20 years. And now with the US looking to start building new "bunker-buster nukes" and with it's "civilian safe" (!) low-yield (< 5 kiloton) mini-nukes we may see them used in warfare again. If the US ever does invade/attack Iran there WILL be a new World War. It can also be argued that both Iraq wars and Afganistan could be called nuclear due to the MASSIVE amounts of radiation having contaminated the region FOR LIFE due to the United States' use of DU.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#4
Eternal Designs said:
The globalists call the Cold War WWIII. They are called the War on Terrorism/Global War on Terrorism/The Long War/whatever they call this week WWIV.

But I certainly hope not. Although the current crop of criminal nut jobs in power has been itching to nuke someone for at least 20 years. And now with the US looking to start building new "bunker-buster nukes" and with it's "civilian safe" (!) low-yield (< 5 kiloton) mini-nukes we may see them used in warfare again. If the US ever does invade/attack Iran there WILL be a new World War. It can also be argued that both Iraq wars and Afganistan could be called nuclear due to the MASSIVE amounts of radiation having contaminated the region FOR LIFE due to the United States' use of DU.
"our first successful counter-attack in our homeland in this new global war -- World War III".

"I believe that. I believe that it was the first counter-attack to World War III.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,19043507-38198,00.html
 
#5
HERESY said:
"our first successful counter-attack in our homeland in this new global war -- World War III".

"I believe that. I believe that it was the first counter-attack to World War III.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,19043507-38198,00.html
The terms WWIII/WW4 are used interchangably for TGWOT depending on who is asked. PNAC calls TGWOT WW4. Some of the other globalists call it WWIII. Either way its just semantics.

The term World War III has been used by Project for the New American Century (PNAC) to describe the Cold War of the 20th century, while the War on Terrorism is referred to as World War IV. PNAC has numerous members who are senior officials in the George W. Bushadministration in the USA as well as in other high positions of influence in the United States. James Woolsey, a founding member of PNAC, stated during his opening statements while speaking on April 2, 2003 on a panel discussion at UCLA entitled "America, Iraq and the War on Terrorism, UCLA":
"A few words about this war we're in, which I don’t really call a war against terrorism. I have adopted a formulation of my friend Elliot Cohen who teaches at Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies calls it World War IV. World War III having been the Cold War. And I think that more accurately characterizes the degree of commitment that we are going to have to be engaged in, and the scope of what we are going to be engaged in now for some years. This Fourth World War I think will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II did for us, hopefully not the full four-plus decades of the Cold War."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III
World War Three is a term used to describe a hypothetical future conflict of World War II–scale. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_4
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#7
Eternal Designs said:
The terms WWIII/WW4 are used interchangably for TGWOT depending on who is asked. PNAC calls TGWOT WW4. Some of the other globalists call it WWIII. Either way its just semantics.
Either way, Bush calls the current war WW3 and that was my only point. Yes, its just semantics, and that is why I won't go into PNAC definitions and how the cold war wasn't a "war" like ww1 and ww2.
 
#8
HERESY said:
Either way, Bush calls the current war WW3 and that was my only point. Yes, its just semantics, and that is why I won't go into PNAC definitions and how the cold war wasn't a "war" like ww1 and ww2.
Not trying to argue over a moot point that it seems we both agree on, but TGWOT is very similar to the Cold War in that they both wars were against idealism and neigher have a tangable "enemy". Which is why usually the cold war was thought of as WWIII and this "new" war is being thought of as WW4. I had thought I'd read a quote of Bush also calling the current farse WW4 but I can't seem to find so I must be mistaken.

Either way Cheney and Rumsfeld have said the current war won't end in our lifetime and may last 100 years.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#10
Within 20-30, yes I would agree. It's very fucking possible...Actually, it's quite probable. I'd say 75% chance of it happening before 30 years and a 50% chance it happens before 20 years goes by...

However, with Bush saying that the flight taken down by passengers on 9-11 being the "first counterstrike in WW3" I think there's a good chance we are ALL fucked.
 
#11
Sixxness said:
Within 20-30, yes I would agree. It's very fucking possible...Actually, it's quite probable. I'd say 75% chance of it happening before 30 years and a 50% chance it happens before 20 years goes by...

However, with Bush saying that the flight taken down by passengers on 9-11 being the "first counterstrike in WW3" I think there's a good chance we are ALL fucked.
They've been trying to get us into a nuclear conflict since the late '50's. Luckily it hasn't happened. But watch what they do with IRan. Most likely the most they'll do is sanctions (wich is BS itself) but if they strike or if Isreal strikes there could be a escalation to world war.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#12
Israel is already going looney, they've been fucking up all sorts of shit over there....bridges, people, you name it...

And since there is a war on terror going on, and terror supposedly is ALL over the world...it is a world war, and Bush probably let it slip then had a good PR person cover his ass. Our country is always at war--at least, they are always killing people somewhere....This time, the playing field is the planet, not part of a single continent.
 

Y-S

Sicc OG
Dec 10, 2005
3,765
0
0
#13
Eternal Designs said:
They've been trying to get us into a nuclear conflict since the late '50's. Luckily it hasn't happened. But watch what they do with IRan. Most likely the most they'll do is sanctions (wich is BS itself) but if they strike or if Isreal strikes there could be a escalation to world war.
yeah they probably will nuke iran and shit
 
Jul 21, 2005
1,361
0
0
39
snypamuzicc.blogspot.com
#14
Cold War wasnt WW3, wasnt enough countries involve and war on terror that aint WW4 either, which country/countries is enemy then. All it is really just a few people that take shit to serious and some people who dont even think for themself, like some1 put that america is da enemy in the bible that is straight bullshit. I would wanna know how they think god say its ok 2 kill.

And about WW3 happening, history will repeat itself so yes.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#17
Dark Shadow said:
Cold War wasnt WW3, wasnt enough countries involve and war on terror that aint WW4 either, which country/countries is enemy then. All it is really just a few people that take shit to serious and some people who dont even think for themself, like some1 put that america is da enemy in the bible that is straight bullshit. I would wanna know how they think god say its ok 2 kill.

And about WW3 happening, history will repeat itself so yes.
You don't make any sense.
 
#18
Y-Soulja said:
yeah they probably will nuke iran and shit
Although there are several politicians and Bush cabinet members who would like to nuke Iran, it in all likelyhood won't happen. Cause if it did Iran would immediately strike Isreal and our troops in Iraq and Russia and China would immediately strike the US as well, thus WWIII.

Dark Shadow said:
Cold War wasnt WW3, wasnt enough countries involve and war on terror that aint WW4 either, which country/countries is enemy then. All it is really just a few people that take shit to serious and some people who dont even think for themself, like some1 put that america is da enemy in the bible that is straight bullshit. I would wanna know how they think god say its ok 2 kill.
World War Three is a term used to describe a hypothetical future conflict of World War II–scale. Most usages of the term include the use of weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear weapons.
A lot of geo-political figures use the term WWIII to describe the Cold War and so some have begun to call TGWOT WW4. But as I said in my previous post both terms are just semantics. And as heresy has linked to Bush has gone on record to call TGWOT WW3.

Hopefully the sane politicians (those of them left/not paid off) won't let anything escalate to WW status again. The amount of money spent on wars in just the last 50 years could have paid for every person to have a harvard level education or we could of colonized the Moon or Mars. Its such a waste.
 

Y-S

Sicc OG
Dec 10, 2005
3,765
0
0
#19
^^^ Ya lol, I remember the news about that, I agree

War's a definitely a waste......but........sometimes it's not, so some countries could get rich and gain more resources, oh well...
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#20
Y-Soulja said:
shit's too political, ain't it?
Theres much more involved than just strictly politics...but thats the underloay of it all....

It all comes down to a ultimate struggle for WORLD POWER...controlling who gets what,how much of it and WHEN they get it....

Let the madness begin...or should i say...let the madness CONTINUE...