North Korea...a "Terrorist" state????

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 2, 2003
1,439
6
0
#1
well according to the white house...thats what they are labeled...Colin Powell made the most recent accusation..BUT...is calling north korea a "terrorist state" legit? or is the phrase thrown around to stir up emotions of americans towards north korea? WE ALL KNOW how americans supposedly "feel" about terrorists...so does the white house play the terrorist card to gain support?....the rhetoric is sounding very generic and overused...but y dont people realize this!!!!
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#2
When the White House announces that N. Korea is selling nuclear arms to "terrorist" organizations, the invasion will begin. People are being readied for it by the propaganda now, much like we were peppered with anti-Saddam propaganda after 9/11 and before the war began.
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#3
TOKZTLI said:
When the White House announces that N. Korea is selling nuclear arms to "terrorist" organizations, the invasion will begin. People are being readied for it by the propaganda now, much like we were peppered with anti-Saddam propaganda after 9/11 and before the war began.
Yup...Our future moves are in the newspapers right now...just read between the lines.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,582
2
0
50
#4
Do they really want to mess with N. Korea??!?!?! From what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong, they have a lot of nukes aimed right for us. Not that anyone else doesn't but from what Iunderstand its major over there. Anyone have any informationon that?
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#5
The odd thing is that a country like North Korea who could do some damage to us is coming up in many topics of conversation now a days, almost as frequently as reinstating the draft. Hmhmmmm. Draft. North Korea. Draft. North Korea. Theres a correlation somewhere. I just can't put my finger on it.
 
Mar 2, 2004
801
0
0
#6
yup. i just hope north korea doesnt get any off if we attack or hopefully we can blast them out over the pacific. i dont think north korea will lay down their arms b/c bush or kerry says so. i dont think you can talk them down. but who knows? they have a fucked up economy so maybe we can help them out there and trade for the nukes if Kim gives a fuck. their soldiers have been training over there for yearrrrrrs as if they are going into war tomorrow.
 
Jun 17, 2004
849
2
0
#8
i dont find this suprising... iraq posed a much much lesser threat than north korea. N. korea and Iran are just the next targets of the growing empire of the u.s.
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#9
I don't know if anyone saw it, but former secy. of state Madeline Albright was on the daily show saying that when she held that position, she had an ongoing dialogue with Kim jong-eel (no idea how it's spelled)...and that when Bush, AKA Westrumble's hero, took over, all talks with N. Korea were severed...in hindsight, it might have been nice to have kept those lines open.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
38
#11
hahahaha shiiiiit. They got hella GIs in that area, S. Korea, Japan and shit. Man, Kim Jong Il is a fuckin animal, that foo don't give a shit. And for the doode up there talkin about their economy, nah homie, Kim Jong Il is living good. Why u think he so fat? Him and his 3 million man army is niiiice. It's the people who living like shit. Yea, ever since bush became president relations with both Koreas been to shit... he's really fuckin things up hella bad. Man, if the US does go in to N. Korea I can guarantee there will be HELLA people pissed and hella people dead.