DO YOU THINK IT WOULD HELP OR HURT THE WARRIORS IF THEY SIGN NATE ROBINSON??? I THINK ITS A GOOD LOOK FROM A COACHING PERSPECTIVE CUZ NATE HAS TALENT AND MARK JACCSON IS THE BEST MAN TO PUT A LIL CONTROL IN HIS GAME AND TEACH HIM HOW TO ACTUALLY BE A POINT GUARD IN THE NBA
anyways, it might help if either monta or curry is traded, since i hear either one of em is on the trading block since the warriors are pursuing dwight howard.
but what would really help the warriors is if they bring back adonal foyle from retirement...
dwight howard + adonal foyle = it's curtains for the rest of the league
Nate doesn't bring much to the table IMHO. While he was one of the great Huskies, he just doesnt have enough bball talent to be a factor. Sure, he had a few OK years, he isnt turning any heads these days. Heck of an athlete though.
Nate had no run in OKC last year. If he couldn't get no meaningful minutes even when Westbrook was causing havoc in the playoffs = garbage minutes for Nate for Golden St.
nate is the smallest beast in the league....i really wanted the lakers to sign him. oh well, u guys need him more, considerin stephen curry goes down evey other week.
Nate is one of the most underrated players in the league. He used to tear it up in NY and he was a huge spark off the bench for Boston in the playoffs. I don't know why people are so down on this guy. He would be a legit backup for anyone and could easily start for a handful of teams.
And if I heard correctly after the Oklahoma buyout Golden State is only paying him like 800K a year??? What the fuck were other teams thinking? You don't think he could have helped out the Lakers behind old as Jesus Derek Fisher for 800k?