N.W.O Back?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

ESFCE

Sicc OG
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#3
WWE always ruin good things like this. I can see it ending with Cena beating all the NXT guys inane handicap match.

That ending to Raw was sick though..for once something that don't feel scripted
 
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
39
#5
That danceoff was the best bit I've seen on Raw in years.
lol! yeah i was expecting kozlov to just beat the shit outta santino when it was his turn, but he busted out with the robot lol wtf

on a side note i sorta hope it dont turn out to be a new
"NWO" type thing...hope its just somethin different
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#6
I was thinking the same thing. I was like "Fuck people are going to pick danceoff and Kozlov is just going to headbutt Santino".

Lol.

When I saw Santino's routine I was like... "This motherfucker has been practicing this spot for months." Then when Kozlov actually walked forward to dance I lost it.

Anyway, I've been reading a ton of positive feedback on the NXT thing. Everyone seems pretty hyped about it. I'm down for a new NWO thing. I wasn't really a fan of the past wwe "invasion" angles because they didn't really make enough out of them.
 
Jun 9, 2007
5,122
11
0
#7
I wonder if J.R. might come back in some sort of a leadership or mentoring role with this angle.. especially with how Danielson kept calling Cole a "wannabe J.R." and with how Ross himself confirmed he's with WWE in a "different capacity" and might be seen on TV sometime but not in an announcing role.

either way, I love the angle and the ending to Raw was the best in years
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#9
Watching this over again, I think the reason I like TNA's style more than WWE is that they have shittier cameras.

The WWE cameras are so high quality that you know you're watching characters. It's like the diff between a sitcom and a soap opera. I'm not saying you don't know they're characters in either, I'm just saying you get a completely different feel because of the type of camera/lighting/angles they use.

I've always like the sloppier cuts/shaky cam feel. The attitude era had that. I think that WWE hurts themselves because of their very high production value.

It's like the diff between




and

 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#11
Watching this over again, I think the reason I like TNA's style more than WWE is that they have shittier cameras.

The WWE cameras are so high quality that you know you're watching characters. It's like the diff between a sitcom and a soap opera. I'm not saying you don't know they're characters in either, I'm just saying you get a completely different feel because of the type of camera/lighting/angles they use.

I've always like the sloppier cuts/shaky cam feel. The attitude era had that. I think that WWE hurts themselves because of their very high production value.

It's like the diff between




and

you serious, thats one of the reasons tna is so shitty, it gives that whole feel like this shit is straight generic. That and the fact there arena/studio is so small hardly that many people in the crowd
 
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
39
#12
i will never forget the day when i watched TNA a few years ago and saw Samoa Joe come out with these lame fake ass samoan or pacific islander females holding up Roman candles along the entrance way, for his pyro...shit was beyond cheap and wack
 

ESFCE

Sicc OG
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#14
Watching this over again, I think the reason I like TNA's style more than WWE is that they have shittier cameras.

The WWE cameras are so high quality that you know you're watching characters. It's like the diff between a sitcom and a soap opera. I'm not saying you don't know they're characters in either, I'm just saying you get a completely different feel because of the type of camera/lighting/angles they use.

I've always like the sloppier cuts/shaky cam feel. The attitude era had that. I think that WWE hurts themselves because of their very high production value.
The one thing I like from TNA over WWE is the way the backstage segments are filmed now. Like a hidden camera feel, and it's really zoomed in. It gives it a more realistic feel, instead of making it seem like a badly acted skit that's being filmed professionally. I hope they stick with it
 

GHP

Sicc OG
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
852
113
45
#15
best Raw ending in years, i cant see Vince keeping all these guys though probably wont last too long.

A couple of the NXT guys are dope though, I'm glad they had wade barrett won it. I havn't catched any episodes yet I need to get up on it

They seem to be pushing alot of guys aside from the normal set, Its ridiculous I know but Zach Ryder is quickly becoming one of my favortes on the mic, his routine is great
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#17
you serious, thats one of the reasons tna is so shitty, it gives that whole feel like this shit is straight generic. That and the fact there arena/studio is so small hardly that many people in the crowd
Yeah... I serious.

Watch an original Raw dude. Tell me how big that place was. Even when they were in arenas, they only sold the bottom seats for the mostpart.

And you know, wrestling is supposed to come off as "real". That's not a "generic" feel, it's a "real" feel. The live "hidden cam" type shit backstage is far superior to anything WWE. The "we only have 2 cameras" feel of the action in the ring is "real".

"Real" and "generic" are far from the same thing, but easily confused.


ON AN IMPORTANT SIDE NOTE: PLEASE DON'T LET ZACH RYDER INFLUENCE YOUR OPINION OF LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK.

I'm really getting into that guy, but MAN is he a disgrace. PUT ON YOUR OTHER PANT LEG, FELLA!