Mr. Kim the Name Caller Calls Out Cheney

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#1
North Korea: Cheney a 'bloodthirsty beast'
VP's comments blasting Kim cited as reason for no nuclear talks

The Associated Press
Updated: 8:34 a.m. ET June 2, 2005


SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea called Vice President Dick Cheney a “bloodthirsty beast” and said Thursday his recent remarks labeling ruler Kim Jong Il irresponsible are another reason for it to stay away from six-nation nuclear disarmament talks.

“What Cheney uttered at a time when the issue of the six-party talks is high on the agenda is little short of telling (North Korea) not to come out for the talks,” an unnamed North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman said, according to the state-run Korean Central News Agency.

Nearly a year since the last session of the six-nation talks, North Korea has refused to return to the table, citing a “hostile” U.S. policy. More recently, it has also called for an apology for being labeled one of the world’s “outposts of tyranny” by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

In a Sunday interview on CNN, Cheney called the North Korean leader “one of the world’s most irresponsible leaders” who runs a police state and leaves his people in poverty and malnutrition.

Bush, Rice more polite
President Bush himself has sounded a more conciliatory tone recently, referring to Kim this week at a news conference using the title “Mr.”

Rice has also said the U.S. recognizes the North as a sovereign nation, and U.S. officials insist they have no intention to attack the communist state.

But North Korea said Thursday that the remarks by Cheney, “boss of the hawkish hard-liners, revealed the true colors of this group steering the implementation of the policy of the Bush administration.”

The North also leveled a bitter personal attack on Cheney, saying he was “hated as the most cruel monster and bloodthirsty beast as he has drenched various parts of the world in blood.”

Despite the tough talk, the North said it maintains its commitment to ending the nuclear standoff on the Korean Peninsula and seeking a peaceful solution to the current standoff.

“But if the U.S. persists in its wrong behavior, misjudging our magnanimity and patience as a sign of weakness, this will entail more serious consequences,” the spokesman said, without any elaboration.

Earlier this week, Pyongyang’s state media also lashed out at Rice in harsh personal terms, implying she was in control of the White House.

Soldiers' remains an issue
Meanwhile, the North also Thursday criticized a Defense Department decision to halt missions to recover remains of thousands of U.S. soldiers from the Korean War and said it would disband its own search unit.

“In consequence, the U.S. remains buried in Korea can never be recovered but are bound to be reduced to earth with the flow of time,” a North Korean army spokesman said, according to KCNA.

Washington said it was halting the missions, which began in 1996, out of concerns for U.S. troops’ safety. Pyongyang denied they had ever been at risk and said the Americans had been able to remove remains “without having even a single fingernail hurt.”

Also Thursday, the North demanded the U.S. withdraw 15 F-117A Nighthawk stealth fighters recently deployed to South Korea on a regular annual training exercise.

The latest nuclear standoff with North Korea was sparked in late 2002 when U.S. officials accused Pyongyang of running a secret uranium enrichment program in violation of a 1994 agreement. The North later pulled out of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and restarted its main reactor — which it shut down this year and said it had removed the fuel rods, a step that would enable it to harvest more weapons-grade plutonium.

The last round of six-nation talks — including China, Japan, Russia, the United States and the two Koreas — met in June. Three rounds of the negotiations in Beijing have failed to lead to any breakthroughs.


URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8071846/
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#3
The problem with that is the geographical proximity of Japan, Russia, China, S. Korea. I doubt those countries would agree to the U.S. making unilateral decisions for all of them.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
38
#4
Nah, the REAL problem is that bush doesn't wanna give Kim Jong Il face.. S. Korea, and China have ENCOURAGED the US to hold unilateral talks with N.Korea. It's not really about making decisions FOR Japan, Korea, etc etc, it's about handling the problems between NORTH Korea and America. China doesn't really hold as much influence over N.Korea as some ppl believe she does, neither does Russia really. The US needs to hold direct talks with N. Korea, six party talks aren't really gonna get anyone anywhere. Clinton did it with his "sunshine" policy, but bush is a jackass.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#10
Rob S4 said:
Kim has no room to talk about being a bloodthirsty beast.
If he's the bloodthirsty beast implied in your comment, then doesn’t that make him one of the most qualified to point one out when he sees one?

Or are you just a dumb ass like previously mentioned?
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
38
#12
HERESY said:
Can you elaborate on your statement? How come Kim has no room to talk about being a blood thirsty beast?
Going out on a limb, but I'm thinking he meant that Kim Jong Il was being hypocritical because he himself is a bloodthirsty beast. However, it takes one to know one...
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
45
#13
ColdBlooded said:
If he's the bloodthirsty beast implied in your comment, then doesn’t that make him one of the most qualified to point one out when he sees one?

Or are you just a dumb ass like previously mentioned?

Go Joe. End
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
45
#15
ColdBlooded said:
you got soned

Whatever kid, your just a loser on the net. Go back to watching G.I. Joe and eating coco puffs. Go argue with a cat who cares what you think. I think your a loser who lives on the siccness because you dont have a life, no girls like you and all your friends are action figures. Get a life son.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#17
Rob S4 said:
Whatever kid, your just a loser on the net. Go back to watching G.I. Joe and eating coco puffs. Go argue with a cat who cares what you think. I think your a loser who lives on the siccness because you dont have a life, no girls like you and all your friends are action figures. Get a life son.

desperate attempt to scrape together your hurt feelings after you got soned


perhaps you should seek counseling
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
45
#18
ColdBlooded said:
desperate attempt to scrape together your hurt feelings after you got soned


perhaps you should seek counseling

Soned is not a word little guy. Go back to your comics like a good little boy. I however owned you with the last comment made. Maybe you should go back to reading the dictionary kid. You couldnt fade me even if you were a barber.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#19
Maybe in whatever non-hip-hop world you live in. You get wrecked virtually every time you come in this forum by a number of different posters. That's why you're trying to dodge the repeated questions you keep getting. It's probably smart, you wouldn't want to catch more than one per-thread.
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#20
studiogangster said:
how long before N.korea becomes u.s.'s first priority? oil war/nuclear war? any thoughts

I think it is a high priority but it is being dealt with quite differently than other foreign issues. Its more of a cold war approach to it, trying to play "psychological" games with the issue rather than a direct method of dealing with it.