More Nukes!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
US says it supplied Israel with nuclear missiles for subs


THE OBSERVER , LONDON AND JERUSALEM
Monday, Oct 13, 2003,Page 1
Israeli and US officials have admitted collaborating to deploy US-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads in Israel's fleet of Dolphin-class submarines, giving the Middle East's only nuclear power the ability to strike at any of its Arab neighbors.

The unprecedented disclosure came as Israel announced that states `harboring terrorists' are legitimate targets, responding to Syria's declaration of its right to self-defense should Israel bomb its territory again.

According to Israeli and Bush administration officials interviewed by the Los Angeles Times, the sea-launch capability gives Israel the ability to target Iran more easily should the Iranians develop their own nuclear weapons.

Although it has been long suspected that Israel bought three German diesel-electric submarines with the specific aim of arming them with nuclear cruise missiles, the admission that the two countries had collaborated in arming the fleet with a nuclear-capable weapons system is significant at a time of growing crisis between Israel and its neighbors.

According to the paper, the disclosure by two US officials is designed to discourage Israel's enemies from launching an attack amid rapidly escalating tensions in the region following a raid by Israeli jets on an alleged terrorist training camp near the Syrian capital, Damascus.

In a clear echo of the US President George W. Bush doctrine of pre-emption, the Israeli Foreign Ministry's senior spokesman, Gideon Meir, said, "Israel views every state that is harboring terrorist organizations and the leaders of those terrorist organizations who are attacking innocent citizens of the state of Israel as legitimate targets out of self defense."

The disclosure is certain to complicate UN-led efforts to persuade Iran to make a full disclosure of its nuclear program. It will also complicate US efforts to reach out to moderate Arab states when they are pressing for an equal disclosure of Israel's nuclear weapons program.

Although Israel has long been known to possess nuclear weapons, in the past it has abided by a deal struck with then-US president Richard Nixon in 1969 that it would maintain "ambiguity" about its retention of weapons in exchange for the US turning a blind eye. According to reliable estimates, Israel has around 200 nuclear war heads.

It acquired the three Dolphin class submarines, which can remain at sea for a month, in the late 1990s. They are equipped with six torpedo tubes suitable for the 53cm torpedoes that are normally used on most submarines.

It had been understood they would carry a version of the "Popeye Turbo" cruise missiles being developed by Rafael Armament Development Authority of Israel.

Israel's seaborne nuclear doctrine is designed to place one submarine in the Persian Gulf, the other in the Mediterranean, with a third on standby. Secret test launches of the cruise missile systems were understood to have been undertaken in May 2000 when Israel carried out tests in the Indian Ocean.

"We tolerate nuclear weapons in Israel for the same reason we tolerate them in Britain and France," one of the LA Times' sources told the paper. "We don't regard Israel as a threat."

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2003/10/13/2003071476

Also See Story:
Governing Council plays down differences with US
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#2
Executive Intelligence Review
[www.larouchepub.com]
[www.nysol.se/arabic]

Beast-Men' Cheney, Sharon
Plan New, Nuclear Mideast Wars
This release was issued on Oct. 14 by the LaRouche in 2004 political
committee.

Lyndon LaRouche, one of only two Democratic Party Presidential
candidates certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) as
qualified for Federal matching funds, issued a strong warning on Oct.
14 that the world is facing a major eruption of war in the Near East
in the immediate weeks ahead, unless President Bush can be made to
intervene forcefully and publicly, to curb Israel's breakaway-ally
regime under Ariel Sharon.

LaRouche said that we have reached a strategic danger-point where,
unless "Beast-man" Dick Cheney is dumped from the Bush
Administration, and "Beast-man" Sharon is stopped, a new Middle East
war is virtually certain between now and some point in November, with
the possible new, horrific feature of Israeli use of nuclear weapons
against targets inside the territory of Iran. Israel is economically
and strategically bankrupt, and hopeless. Sharon is losing ground.
Under these circumstances, the mad-dog faction in Israel could use
nuclear weapons versus Iran.

LaRouche drew attention to the report, published in the Oct. 12, 2003
Los Angeles Times ("Israel Adds Subs to Its Atomic Ability," by
Douglas Frantz), that Israel now has deployed submarines, carrying
nuclear-armed Harpoon missiles, able to strike Iran and other
regional targets.

LaRouche further warned: The U.S. military has no capability for
carrying out any further wars, so long as American forces are tied
down in Iraq—unless the U.S.A., too, were to resort to the use of
nuclear weapons. Thus, if the current, planned Israeli war stunt is
not stopped now, we also face the prospect—going into the pre-U.S.A.
election Autumn of 2004—of a desperate Cheney-led and chicken-hawk-
dominated Bush Administration being tempted to use nuclear weapons
against North Korea. At this moment, the neo-conservatives in and
around the Bush Administration are pushing for Israel to use nuclear
weapons to set the precedent for the later American use of mini-nukes
against targets in North Korea. The controllers of this neo-con war-
party apparatus need their Sharon asset to do the job, to set off
this chain of events.

LaRouche concluded, that an American Presidential crackdown on Sharon
is the only near-certain way to stop this Sharon war plan. The danger
in the immediate period ahead is that Israel attacks Syria and then
Iran, leading to a U.S.A. nuclear attack on North Korea just prior to
the 2004 Presidential elections.

Cheney's Steps to War
At the center of this war drive, and the protection of Sharon, is
Vice President Dick Cheney, who has recently revived the drive to
attack Syria and Iran—through a Sharon-led Israeli "surrogate war." A
timeline of recent events highlights Cheney's role in this mad effort
to blow up the Near East:

* In early September 2003, David Wurmser, the primary author of "A
Clean Break"—the July 1996 scheme to wreck the Oslo Peace Accords,
prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—was
transferred from the State Department arms control office, where he
was special assistant to John Bolton, to the Office of the Vice
President, replacing Eric Edelman, who was named to be the new U.S.
Ambassador to Turkey. At that point, Cheney revived the targeting of
Syria and Lebanon, which had been scotched at the close of the Iraq
war in late April, despite feverish efforts at the time by the war
party to extend the Iraq war into Syria.

* On Sept. 16, again at Cheney's urging, Bolton was given the green
light to testify before a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee, on
Syria's role in terrorism and its illegal WMD program. This testimony
had been stopped a month prior, when the CIA produced a 38-page
document, disputing many of Bolton's charges against Syria. The day
after Bolton's testimony, the same subcommittee heard rabid testimony
on Syria and Lebanon from Daniel Pipes and Gen. Michel Aoun, former
Lebanese Prime Minister (1988-90) and a prop in the Hudson Institute
drive for a war against Syria. The Hudson Institute Mideast project
is headed by Meyrav Wurmser, wife of David Wurmser, now of Cheney's
staff. She also co-authored "A Clean Break," along with Richard
Perle, Charles Fairbanks (Paul Wolfowitz's closest friend and
disciple), Douglas Feith and others.

* On Oct. 5, Israel bombed sites inside Syrian territory. While the
attacks were ostensibly in retaliation for a suicide bombing in Haifa
the day before, the Israeli Cabinet had in fact approved the bombing
raids into Syria six weeks earlier. Sharon's announcement of the
Syria raids used formulations taken verbatim from President Bush's
March 20, 2003 announcement of the launching of the U.S. invasion of
Iraq.

* Oct. 9, the Bush Administration lifted its opposition to the Syria
Accountability and Restoration of Lebanese Sovereignty Act—a bill
modeled on the Iraq Liberation Act—that would pave the way for
sanctions and "regime change" in Syria and Lebanon. The bill is being
pushed through Congress on a fast track, delivering an unambiguous
message to Sharon that he has a green light from Washington to attack
Syria.

* Oct. 12 marked the opening of a five-day conference in Jerusalem,
which can only be described as a "gathering of the beasts" to prepare
for the new wars, targeting both Syria and Iran. The event is co-
sponsored by the U.S.A.-based Christian Zionist front, the National
Unity Coalition for Israel (NUCI); the City of Jerusalem; the Israeli
Ministry of Tourism; and the Mikhail Chernoy Foundation, a Russian
Mafiya front in Israel. Along with the most rabid Israeli "Beast-men"—
from Bibi Netanyahu, Rabbi Benny Elon, Effi Eitam, Ehud Olmert,
Avigdor Lieberman to Uzi Landau—other featured speakers include
Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Alan Keyes, Yossef Bodansky, Daniel
Pipes and Rev. Mike Evans.

Partner-in-Crime Is Shultz
LaRouche emphasized that Cheney is accountable for the Iraq fiasco.
Cheney was the point-man for the war party faction. He is accountable
for the fact that the U.S. military is at the breaking point. If
President Bush and Secretary of State Powell fail to get 50,000
foreign troops into Iraq before year's end, then the Pentagon will be
forced to call up 100,000 more reservists and National Guardsmen for
duty in Iraq, to rotate out the existing forces. The military
hospitals are overflowing with casualties from the Iraq war. Some
eyewitnesses describe it as a situation unseen in the United States
since the Civil War. This is the hidden scandal of the ongoing Iraq
war, a scandal that is too big to hide.

And Cheney's partner-in-crime, LaRouche concluded, the real "Beast-
meister," is George Shultz. He is not only the Godfather of the neo-
con team that seized control of the Bush Administration before it
even came into office. Shultz is also the man behind the Arnold
Schwarzenegger recall election atrocity in California.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#3
2-0-Sixx said:


unless "Beast-man" Dick Cheney is dumped from the Bush
Administration, and "Beast-man" Sharon is stopped,

Israel is economically and strategically bankrupt, and hopeless.

Under these circumstances, the mad-dog faction in Israel

election Autumn of 2004—of a desperate Cheney-led and chicken-hawk-dominated Bush Administration being tempted to use nuclear weapons

A timeline of recent events highlights Cheney's role in this mad effort to blow up the Near East:

The event is co-sponsored by the U.S.A.-based Christian Zionist front,

Along with the most rabid Israeli "Beast-men"—from Bibi Netanyahu, Rabbi Benny Elon, Effi Eitam, Ehud Olmert,
Avigdor Lieberman to Uzi Landau—other featured speakers include Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Alan Keyes, Yossef Bodansky, Daniel Pipes and Rev. Mike Evans.

Partner-in-Crime Is Shultz

The military hospitals are overflowing with casualties from the Iraq war. Some eyewitnesses describe it as a situation unseen in the United States since the Civil War.

And Cheney's partner-in-crime, LaRouche concluded, the real "Beast-meister," is George Shultz. He is not only the Godfather of the neo-con team that seized control of the Bush Administration before it even came into office. Shultz is also the man behind the Arnold Schwarzenegger recall election atrocity in California.
man, talk about a conspiracy theorist. i thought youwere above posting such a poorly written article.
 
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#4
iraq doesnt have nukes, they were never a threat like korea is, they have oil and resources, RESOURCES is and has always been the number one reason for war, and it still is in this scenario, so sixxness, quit posting articles about nukes, and mclean quit using your ultra ignorance to try and defend bush. that is that.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#5
IN THIS POST I AINT EVEN DEFENDING ANY1 ALL I AM SAYING IS A THIRD GRADER COULD HAVE WRITEN A BETTER ARTICLE, THIS WRITER OBVIOUSLY IS AN ANTI-AMERICAN AND AN ANTI-SEMITE WHO HAS GONE OFF THE DEEP END.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#6
Mcleanhatch said:
IN THIS POST I AINT EVEN DEFENDING ANY1 ALL I AM SAYING IS A THIRD GRADER COULD HAVE WRITEN A BETTER ARTICLE, THIS WRITER OBVIOUSLY IS AN ANTI-AMERICAN AND AN ANTI-SEMITE WHO HAS GONE OFF THE DEEP END.
WHY IS THAT ANYONE CAN DISAGREE WITH ANY COUNTRY AND ITS OK, BUT AS SOON AS SOMEONE DISAGREE'S OR INSULTS ISRAEL HE IS CALLED AN ANTI-SEMITE???

I'VE SAID IT BEFORE AND I'LL SAY IT AGAIN, ISRAEL IS THE CANCER OF THE MIDLE EAST. AM I ANTI-SEMITE?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#8
Mcleanhatch said:
CALLING PEOPLE ZIONISTS, AND BEASTMEN ISNT IN ANYWAY DEROGATORY TO YOU???

IF I WHITE MAN USED THE WORD "NIGGER" WOULD YOU BE SINGING A DIFFERENT TUNE???
"Beastman" is obviously an insult used directly for CHENEY AND SHARON and NOT the Israeli people. NO WHERE IN THE ARTICLE IS HE CALLING JEWS OF ISRAEL "BEASTMEN" HE IS CALLING CHENEY/SHARON BEASTMEN WHICH THEY ARE.

The word "Zionism" is NOT a racist term, it is what they are. So I dont know why the fuck you would consider this word "derogatory" unless you are completely ignorant of the term.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#9
WELL THEN LET ME MORE SPECIFIC: IF A WHITE MAN CALLED JESSE JACKSON OR AL SHARPTON A "NIGGER" WOULD THAT NOT BE A RACIST THEN BECAUSE IT IS BEING DIRECTED AT 2 MEN AND NOT AT ALL BLACK MEN???