More Censorship from Clear Channel (owner of 949 and 106)

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
736
0
0
#1
July 19, 2005
More Censorship from Clear Channel
"Don't F--k Around with Tha Police"


By DAVEY D
www.counterpunch.org

Last week two St Louis deejays from radio station KATZ (100.3 FM), were suspended after local police deemed their on air remarks inappropriate and called for a boycott of the Clear Channel owned station known as 'The Beat'. For some this may seem like an unusual story, but in fact there's a long history of police being able to use their influence and sometimes the law to silence those who wish to speak out against them especially within Hip Hop.

The most glaring example is what happened to NWA after they released the song 'F--K Tha Police'. The popularity of the song resulted in numerous police departments all over the country stepping to concert venue owners and insisting that contracts be drawn up prohibiting the group from performing the song. In one infamous scenario in Detroit, the group tried to do the song and were bum-rushed by 20 undercover cops.

The story leading up to the bank robbery conspiracy conviction of the late Mac Dre is also glaring. About 15 years ago, scores of young Black men in Mac Dre's Vallejo neighborhood called the Crest were being rounded up and questioned after a series of bank robberies. The police accused a loosely knit group who resided in Dre's neighborhood called the Romper Room Crew. Dre responded by releasing a song called 'Punk Police' which smashed on VPD for their faulty moves. He gave props to the Romper Room cats and called out an overzealous police sergeant by name. The rest they say is history.

A few weeks after the song was released Dre found himself being monitored by both VPD and the FBI. When he made a road trip to Fresno, California, a passenger he was rolling with, told police that him and Dre had planned to rob a bank-a charge Dre had vehemently denied to his recent death. That accusation coupled with the lyrics in Dre's song helped get him convicted for conspiracy to rob a bank. He served 5 years.

Two weeks after Dre's conviction he called into Bay Area radio station KMEL from prison to discuss his situation. He let listeners know he was set up by a police informant. The following day law enforcement showed up at the station in mass and held a closed door meeting with station managers and basically put the fear of God in them. The result was we were not to diss the police on air or take anymore phone calls from prisoners especially Mac Dre.

Dre's scenario was the start of the whole Hip Hop Police thing which made headlines a couple of years ago. Here in the Bay Area police over the years used their influence to determine what acts could and could not appear at certain concerts or even the type of music one could play at a night club. Those who decided to oppose any police department recommendations or ordinances would find their entertainment permits pulled by these various police agencies and over the top policing of their venue with patrons and even artists being harassed. For years KMEL would have to consult with local police to see if it was ok to have certain rap acts perform at their Summer Jam concert. The people who were most penalized were local rap acts who the police had erroneously determined had gang affiliations (meaning they lived in neighborhoods the police considered dangerous).

For those who think this is far fetched look at the type of steps that have been taken by police unions around the country that have called for the boycott of entertainers who have called for a new trial for political prisoner Mumia Abu Jamal who is now on death row in Pennsylvania accused of killing a police officer.

Over the years we've heard stories of popular Hip Hop radio deejays and radio stations either being warned or stepped to by the police with the goal of making sure heated rhetoric was toned down and particular songs not played on air...

Folks in Los Angeles may recount a colorful incident that took place with comedian Steve Harvey when he was doing morning drive on KKBT. There was an incident a few years back when an up and coming actor was attending a Halloween Party. He was dressed as a cop and was outside the house looking inside the window when LAPD officers rolled up on him and shot him under the pretense that they thought he was gonna shoot them with his fake gun. Party goers were horrified and angry as was Steve Harvey who promptly got on the air the next morning and blasted the police a new one for their mistake.

The next day after then LA Police Chief Bernard Parks got at Harvey, he went on the air the very next day and apologized for his outburst and said it wasn't his job to be a police critic and basically toned down any anti-police rhetoric all the way up to the time he left-which was earlier this year.

Another case which falls in the same vein was the overwhelming silence that took place after the Amadu Diallo trial where the cops accused of shooting him were released. If you recall, popular radio station Hot 97 which has made a career promoting beefs, avoided that beef like the plague and never opened up their phone lines or even acknowledged the verdict or sentiments felt by many of its Black and Brown listeners to what was one of the NYC's most watched trials. Go figure that...

Adding insult to injury was stations like Hot 97 and other all over the country hardly playing the anti-police Brutality collab song put together by Mos Def and Talib Kweli called 'Hip Hop for Respect'. I want everyone to peep out this article that outlines the group's initial response and plans of action after the Diallo acquittals and ask yourself the following questions:

1-Why did my favorite radio station for Hip Hop and R&B not show their efforts any love?

2-Why were they not nominated for an NAACP image award for their tireless efforts that year?

Here's the link to the article...
http://www.daveyd.com/FullArticles

Also peep out this other article about the turbulent relationship between Hip Hop and the police.

http://www.daveyd.com/FullArticles\articleP9.asp

As you read the article below, keep in mind that while these two deejays got suspended after threats of a police boycott, you still have stations where the N word and other racial and sexist epithets are used day and day out. You also have the recent case where a Clear Channel station in San Francisco hired a racist producer who penned a parody song for Emmis' Hot 97 where he made fun of Tsunami victims by calling them 'Chinks' and 'Gooks'.

So Clear Channel will suspend two jocks for making inappropriate remarks about the police the week of a funeral for a slain officer, yet that same company will go out and hire a known racist who made fun of 220 thousand innocent victims to a horrible tragedy. So where do we draw the line as to what's appropriate and what isn't?

So the message is clear, our tax dollars which support the public airwaves LICENSED to the Clear Channels of the world can be used to support over the top racist behavior, but those same tax dollars will not tolerate anything said against the police who by the way we pay with our tax dollars Something to think about...

Davey D is a hip hop historian, deejay and community organizer. Visit his excellent website at: http://www.daveyd.com/
 
Apr 25, 2002
736
0
0
#7
illmannered666 said:
Isnt it ironic that you are posting about radio censorship after posting that my album should be boycotted for its content? WOW.
First of all, I said IF your shit promotes raping women, then it should be. So relax.



As for the "censorship" talk... I guess the obvious has to be said to some people:


There is a difference between liking rape and not liking cops.

There is a difference between a decision that consumers make about buying music and a decision that a very rich, very powerful, right-wing corporation makes about what DJs are allowed to talk about and what songs can get played.

One decision is from the people, one is from the rulers.

One decision is motivated by a desire to keep racist punk ass cops running shit in the streets, locking up millions of poor people and doing whatever the fuck they feel like and not letting people tell the truth about it. One decision is motivated by a desire to stop women from being raped.

One is censorship, one is not.
 
May 24, 2002
782
0
0
82
www.cinsityrecords.com
#8
Mezzano said:
First of all, I said IF your shit promotes raping women, then it should be. So relax.



As for the "censorship" talk... I guess the obvious has to be said to some people:


There is a difference between liking rape and not liking cops.

There is a difference between a decision that consumers make about buying music and a decision that a very rich, very powerful, right-wing corporation makes about what DJs are allowed to talk about and what songs can get played.

One decision is from the people, one is from the rulers.

One decision is motivated by a desire to keep racist punk ass cops running shit in the streets, locking up millions of poor people and doing whatever the fuck they feel like and not letting people tell the truth about it. One decision is motivated by a desire to stop women from being raped.

One is censorship, one is not.
I disagree...To tell the truth...that's classic censorship right there. Because YOU agree with one and not the other you thinking saying your's is understandable but him saying his is not.

We talk about crime all day in music, we kill, rape, rob, and everything else...That's what Freedom Of Speech is about...it's doesn't really come into play when you are saying something that a lot of your peers agrees with (Fuck The Police)...it comes into play when what you are saying is UNPOPULAR (I like rapin bitches). Regardless if 1 party thinks it's reprehensible, you still have the right to say it.

If you think dude rapin broads is disgusting, then yeah don't buy his shit and Freedom Of Speech allows you to tell anybody who will listen that you think his shit is disgustin...it also allows you to offer your opinion that it should be banned, pulled of the shelf or whatever else you think...but at the same time it allows him to rape a broad on record.

The police have power and they used it to shut mutha fukkas down...if you had the power, based on your comments you prolly woulda shut dudes album down...you can't say that the cops are censoring but (if you had the power) that you banning his music is NOT censoring.
 
May 18, 2004
1,479
1
0
WWW.SHOP.HOMEBOYRAP.COM
#13
get used to it us northern california latins been goin thru this for years and still go thru it,
im gonna put another scenerio out there

street low magazine was not able to throw an event in stockton i beleive, it was because the city had reason to beleive they were tied to a gang and it would attract that crowd, but they could throw it if they came up with a $10,000.00 fee for the police dept,
so basically it said we dont want that crowd here unless u got the money.

another scenerio

salinas carshow 2005
black and brown ent. told they couldnt sell theyre new album game untold because it was gang affiliated and if they were caught selling any at the show it would be curtains.

we go thru this all day and snoop can still make videos about cripp walkiin aint that a bitch