'Mission Accomplished' banner was Mistake?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 16, 2006
1,828
0
0
mylot.com
#1
White House admits fault on 'Mission Accomplished'

http://www.comcast.net/news/articles/general/2008/04/30/Bush.Mission.Accomplished/



WASHINGTON — The White House said Wednesday that President Bush has paid a price for the "Mission Accomplished" banner that was flown in triumph five years ago but later became a symbol of U.S. misjudgments and mistakes in the long and costly war in Iraq.

Thursday is the fifth anniversary of Bush's dramatic landing in a Navy jet on an aircraft carrier homebound from the war. The USS Abraham Lincoln had launched thousands of airstrikes on Iraq.

"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended," Bush said at the time. "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on Sept. 11, 2001, and still goes on." The "Mission Accomplished" banner was prominently displayed above him — a move the White House came to regret as the display was mocked and became a source of controversy.

After shifting explanations, the White House eventually said the "Mission Accomplished" phrase referred to the carrier's crew completing its 10-month mission, not the military completing its mission in Iraq. Bush, in October 2003, disavowed any connection with the "Mission Accomplished" message. He said the White House had nothing to do with the banner; a spokesman later said the ship's crew asked for the sign and the White House staff had it made by a private vendor.

"President Bush is well aware that the banner should have been much more specific and said `mission accomplished' for these sailors who are on this ship on their mission," White House press secretary Dana Perino said Wednesday. "And we have certainly paid a price for not being more specific on that banner. And I recognize that the media is going to play this up again tomorrow, as they do every single year."

She said what is important now is "how the president would describe the fight today. It's been a very tough month in Iraq, but we are taking the fight to the enemy."

At least 49 U.S. troops died in Iraq in April, making it the deadliest month since September when 65 U.S. troops died.

Now in its sixth year, the war in Iraq has claimed the lives of at least 4,061 members of the U.S. military. Only the Vietnam War (August 1964 to January 1973), the war in Afghanistan (October 2001 to present) and the Revolutionary War (July 1776 to April 1783) have engaged America longer.

Bush, in a speech earlier this month, said that "while this war is difficult, it is not endless."

------------------------------------

Holy Shit. I woulda never guessed. :ermm:

I guess I should be at peace with the fact that they're finally owning up to their mistake, but somehow paying $4 for a gallon of gas and an unstable economy which is crumbling apart as we speak keeps coming to mind and won't allow me to. It's not a bad thing for the Bush administration to say that they fucked up, but come on... It seems like too little, too late to me.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#2
What do you mean finally owning up to their mistake? The only thing they said is it was a mistake to have the banner (5 years later), they didn't admit any mistakes in the iraq war or anything like that. They vastly underestimated the situation in Iraq and thought it would be a walk in the park.

They will never admit to any faults in Iraq, only little insignificant things like hanging a banner
 
Oct 16, 2006
1,828
0
0
mylot.com
#3
Ya, I was being sarcastic, buddy. The day that they flew that banner we, not sure how much of the American public felt the same way, but me @ least, knew it was only gonna get worse and that they were lying through their teeth. I was surprised @ the major news coverage of this recently, as if it were news that it was a "mistake."
 
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#4
I honestly dont think the "mission accomplished" banner was a mistake at all. Look at the reality of the situation, baby bush went in to topple and finish the job his father failed, we overthrew the government. In Bushes mind he accomplished what he set out to do. All of this secondary shit like civil war and policing the people is so undefined that you could never legitimately proclaim "victory". i think everyone is missing the point.

im reminded of an interview of a football or basketball player i saw a while ago after his team lost a big game. they asked him how he felt about his team losing. he pointed to the gigantic diamonds on his ears in the post game interview and said something like "are you kidding me, we all won". so from your perspective you think he clearly lost. from his perspective he already won and laughs at what you think is going on. i think the presidents sentiments are similar.
 
Nov 20, 2006
593
0
0
37
#6
It was a mistake, on the Bush administration's part. They just don't wanna take blame for their failed foreign policy.