Mike Bell---starting back for broncos. Tatum Bell 2nd string

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#21
thascary1 said:
you're right system only, I mean what the hell was wrong with griese, kanell, Frerote, van pelt they were all the same calibur as plummer being that they all suck, but it is system only!


I am seriously done...it's pointless talking football with you.
It's not pointless talking football with an expert. Where are those quarterbacks now? Right where Plummer is going to be when Cutler starts taking snaps.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#23
gimpypimp said:
Yeah...that sucks.

NFL Network and the Sunday Ticket...get to watch my Browns lose ALL season long.....

AHHHHH Another directv customer I see....lol Sunday tickets rocks for those days I am not at the games.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#25
gimpypimp said:
It's a must for me cause I live in Cali...I couldn't imagine not being able to watch the games.

hey do you have the superfan upgrade? I was thinking about it, but don't know if it's actually worth it. I mean it's not hard to go to the game channel to see who's in redzone and then switch from there, but it would be nice extra I guess.


You have a dvr right?

That's awesome last year had the sunday higjlights when I got home from work on Monday....sweetness!
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#26
thascary1 said:
hey do you have the superfan upgrade? I was thinking about it, but don't know if it's actually worth it. I mean it's not hard to go to the game channel to see who's in redzone and then switch from there, but it would be nice extra I guess.


You have a dvr right?

That's awesome last year had the sunday higjlights when I got home from work on Monday....sweetness!
I just have the regular package...I don't know if it's worth it to get the upgrade.

I usually just bounce around from game to game anyway...depending on what's going on...except for the Raiders game of course cause they're always blacked out.

Does the superfan thing include getting the game in HD? If so, that would be the only kinda cool thing for me I guess.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#27
Watching the game, Mike Bell looks pretty terrible in my opinion. He can't cut it.. It must be a scare tatic by Shanahan to Tatum because Mike can't even run on the Lions defense, without 6 of there 7 starting front 7, who are terrible anyway.

Cutler looked really good though, but I like Plummer, and think he's good for Denver, but it's good for Cutler to be able to wait a couple years before he takes the reigns, barring injury.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#28
Robby2Slobby said:
Watching the game, Mike Bell looks pretty terrible in my opinion. He can't cut it.. It must be a scare tatic by Shanahan to Tatum because Mike can't even run on the Lions defense, without 6 of there 7 starting front 7, who are terrible anyway.

Cutler looked really good though, but I like Plummer, and think he's good for Denver, but it's good for Cutler to be able to wait a couple years before he takes the reigns, barring injury.
He can't cut it??

I seem to remember his first 2 runs going for a first down, and that 6 yard run was a nice cut to get past first wave of defense. and then the o-line pretty much didn't give him much the rest of the way, but the fumble was an awesome hit by the defense.

So has Tatum looked better against the 2nd string...no.

Denver's 2nd and 3rd team defense look like shit, but alot of our stating offense didn't play, still no excuse.

Cutler looked good, but yes like Robby said let him learn.

Mike bell looked better against first team then Tatum did against 2nd string
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#29
Robby2Slobby said:
Watching the game, Mike Bell looks pretty terrible in my opinion. He can't cut it.. It must be a scare tatic by Shanahan to Tatum because Mike can't even run on the Lions defense, without 6 of there 7 starting front 7, who are terrible anyway.

Cutler looked really good though, but I like Plummer, and think he's good for Denver, but it's good for Cutler to be able to wait a couple years before he takes the reigns, barring injury.
He can't cut it??

I seem to remember his first 2 runs going for a first down, and that 6 yard run was a nice cut to get past first wave of defense. and then the o-line pretty much didn't give him much the rest of the way, but the fumble was an awesome hit by the defense.

So has Tatum looked better against the 2nd string...no.

Denver's 2nd and 3rd team defense look like shit, but alot of our stating offense didn't play, still no excuse.

Cutler looked good, but yes like Robby said let him learn.

Mike bell looked better against first team then Tatum did against 2nd string
hell cobbs looked better then Tatum did.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#30
gimpypimp said:
I just have the regular package...I don't know if it's worth it to get the upgrade.

I usually just bounce around from game to game anyway...depending on what's going on...except for the Raiders game of course cause they're always blacked out.

Does the superfan thing include getting the game in HD? If so, that would be the only kinda cool thing for me I guess.
I think it would give 1 or 2 games in HD but I am not too sure on that.
I'm still in dark ages I have a big screen but not HD.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#31
Only like four defensive starters for the lions played, as well..

James Hall, Dre Bly, Terrance Holt and Kennoy Kennedy would be all of them I believe.. I don't think any of the starting LBs played..

But I didn't think Mike Bell looked good at all.

He went 7 carries for 20 yards, and one of those carries was an 8 yard rush.. Take that rush out, and he went 6 for 12..

Plus, didn't he lose a fumble or was that another back?

Was Denver's line starting? It'd be understandable if they were missing like three of there lineman or something, but I can't comprehend how the guy is starting... I'm betting he isn't the starter by the end of preseason.