Meet the girl with half a brain

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#1
9-year-old had radical surgery to fight seizures; today she’s back in school

By Mike Celizic
TODAYshow.com contributor
updated 6:56 a.m. PT, Thurs., March. 25, 2010




For three years, little Cameron Mott’s life was a nightmarish succession of violent seizures that consumed her days and threatened her life. Finally, doctors told her parents there was a way to stop them: All they had to do was remove half of Cameron’s brain.

It was not a diagnosis a parent wants to hear. And going through with the operation was not an easy decision. But the alternative was a steady deterioration of the right half of Cameron’s brain — and her whole life.

“It was very scary, because you just can’t imagine what your child will be like after such a dramatic brain surgery,” Shelly Mott told TODAY’s Ann Curry Thursday in New York. “It just doesn’t seem like they can be the same child.”

Shelly could smile as she said it, because next to her on the couch was Cameron, all curly hair and smiles and bouncy energy.

They got their daughter back

Her father, Casey Mott, called Cameron “bubbly,” and the adjective fit perfectly. She was bubbly as a baby, and now, after the radical surgery, she’s bubbly again.

“We more or less lost our daughter and got her back,” Casey told Curry.

Cameron’s story really began six years ago, when she was 3. She suddenly started having seizures. A video supplied by the Motts shows the girl playing happily, then suddenly going completely rigid and collapsing headfirst onto the floor.

For the next three years, the Motts took Cameron to dozens of doctors who conducted hundreds of examinations in an effort to discover what was causing 10 or more such seizures a day. All the while, Cameron’s cognitive functions were deteriorating and she was losing the ability to speak.

Finally, doctors put a name on the condition: Rasmussen’s syndrome, a condition that causes the destruction of one side of the brain. The solution was radical. It’s called a hemispherectomy, which means the removal of half of the brain.

Radical surgery

The Motts live in North Carolina, and they agreed to travel to Johns Hopkins University Medical Center in Baltimore, where neurosurgeon Dr. George Jallo led the team that carefully removed the right side of Cameron’s brain. The surgery took more than seven hours.

That was in 2007, when Cameron was 6. An image of her brain shows an empty space on the right side and a normal brain on the left.

Since the left side of the body is controlled by the right side of the brain, doctors knew that Cameron would be paralyzed on her left side when she awoke. But they also knew that the brains of children have amazing abilities to rewire themselves.

“We like to do children because of their ability or their plasticity — that’s the ability of the other side of the brain that we haven't removed to take over and control the function of the diseased half we’re removing,” Jallo told NBC News.

Cameron was immobilized for the first two days after the surgery to allow her brain to stabilize. Then she went into an intensive physical therapy program. Four weeks after the surgery, she walked out of the hospital.

The right choice

The agonizing decision the Motts had had to make turned out to be right.

“It was absolutely the right choice,” Shelly said. “And, really, for us, when we knew what she had, and we knew that this was our only option to help her, the risk was something that we were willing to deal with because her quality of life was so poor.”

Cameron was able to return to school, where she is now in the second grade and a good student. Her physical therapy sessions have just recently ended, and she can run and play, although she has a slight limp and still wears a brace on her left leg. She also has lost some peripheral vision.

When Curry asked Cameron if she had any lingering effects from the surgery, she said, “No. None at all.”

“We were just asking for some sort of normalcy,” Casey told NBC News. “We didn’t know that we were going to get the full deal. I tell Cameron’s story as a miracle. I truly believe that miracles happen and my daughter Cameron is a walking example of that.”

NBC’s chief medical editor, Dr. Nancy Snyderman, showed on a medical model how half of Cameron’s brain had been removed.

“Because the pediatric brain is so elastic, the left side of her brain took over for the right side, and look at her now. It’s extraordinary,” Snyderman said, looking at a girl who looked like any other 9-year-old.

Although shy on camera, Cameron did share with Curry her goal in life.

“I want to be a ballerina when I grow up,” Cameron said.
Three years ago, that was an impossible dream. Today, it’s one that may yet come true.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/36032653/ns/today-today_health/?gt1=43001#ixzz0jDcVf3xe
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#2
id like to find more information on how her reality is percieved without the right brain. Does she still have feelings? or is her life now based strictly on efficiency and priority?

after reading zen and the art of motorcycle maintenence, it became clear to me that for logic to even have a purpose, there must be an underlying expression of feeling, with or without the right brain.

maybe we need to reclassify what each brain does.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#4
tell me if you can catch this thought first.

without binary 1, binary 0/null doesnt exist.

true or not?

edit: if youre confused ill reword it.


delete existence out of your mind as a whole then answer.
without 1/existance, 0/nonexistence isnt a valid value
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#7
tell me if you can catch this thought first.

without binary 1, binary 0/null doesnt exist.

true or not?

edit: if youre confused ill reword it.


delete existence out of your mind as a whole then answer.
without 1/existance, 0/nonexistence isnt a valid value
Technically, no, 0 cannot exist in that it needs 1 to define it. Its the same with anything that is mutually exclusive.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#11
tell me if you can catch this thought first.

without binary 1, binary 0/null doesnt exist.

true or not?

edit: if youre confused ill reword it.


delete existence out of your mind as a whole then answer.
without 1/existance, 0/nonexistence isnt a valid value

Like in the Pythagorean view?

IDK man, this discussion seems like an entirely different rabbit hole. Having read the book myself, I was more curious what led you to this revelation.

For the sake of my original question, True.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#12
Like in the Pythagorean view?

IDK man, this discussion seems like an entirely different rabbit hole. Having read the book myself, I was more curious what led you to this revelation.

For the sake of my original question, True.
ok. yes the answer is true.

now reading the book especially in the beginning, he spoke of romantic(right brain) and classical(logic) modes of thinking. But he expanded on classical thinking of as having an underlying value/romanticism to it, such as taking apart the bike and seeing how it all works.

im actually overly logical and i wish i had more emotion, but reading that allowed me to see that my logic is fully based on an underlying love/fear relationship i have with the world.
Would we become robotic if we had only the logical brain? i believe not.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#14
ok. yes the answer is true.

now reading the book especially in the beginning, he spoke of romantic(right brain) and classical(logic) modes of thinking. But he expanded on classical thinking of as having an underlying value/romanticism to it, such as taking apart the bike and seeing how it all works.

im actually overly logical and i wish i had more emotion, but reading that allowed me to see that my logic is fully based on an underlying love/fear relationship i have with the world.
Would we become robotic if we had only the logical brain? i believe not.
@ mr. niceguy

how did u interpret the distinction of classical/romantic modes of thinking.
were they really that different once they were broken down?
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#19
no need to bro its all good,
anyway, heres my answer to my original enquiry

Does the “Right Brain vs. Left Brain” Spinning Dancer Test Work?
- asks Aki from San Francisco

[Credit: Internet Movie Database]
By Jeremy Hsu | Posted October 29, 2007
Posted in: Ever Wondered?, Life Science
High on Memory
Red Wine Good for Gray Matter
Healing our Brains, Changing our Selves?
Why do doctors wear green or blue scrubs?
A new “brain test” floating around online shows a spinning dancer and asks whether you see the image rotating clockwise or counterclockwise. If it spins clockwise, you supposedly use more of your right brain. Counterclockwise, and you’re more of a left brain person. The test then lists functions associated with each side of the brain – the left side includes “uses logic” and “facts rule,” while the right side includes “uses feeling” and “imagination rules.”

A good friend complained that the test told her she was a left brain person, even when she knew herself to not be into left brain associations such as “math and science.” A similar discrepancy was discerned by one of the authors of the Freakonomics blog, when he conducted a quick, nonscientific survey of blog readers, which cross referenced college majors and spinning dancer test results.

If the test sounds flawed, that’s not just because one shouldn’t use spinning dancers to characterize their brain strengths. Rather, the test is coming up inaccurate because it provides a crude view of the “lateralization of brain function,” or the concept that each side of the human brain specializes in certain mental activities.

The concept was born in the 1960s, when Roger Sperry studied epilepsy patients who had had a nerve connection between their hemispheres surgically cut. He found that the left brain hemisphere seemed to possess “speech and a rational, intellectual style,” while the right side was “inarticulate, but blessed with special spatial abilities.”

Modern neuroscience studies using brain imaging technology such as fMRI – which shows active areas of the brain while a person is trying to perform a task – have further suggested that language ability tends to be localized in the left hemisphere, while spatial ability tends to be in the right hemisphere.

However, neuroscience-minded blogs like Neurophilosophy point out that doing any complex mental activity requires cooperation from both sides of the brain, although certain processing tasks required for that activity may be concentrated on one side or the other. In other words, saying that “math and science are left brain functions” is an over-generalized statement.

“It’s not that you have a special math module somewhere in your brain, but rather that the brain’s particular functional organization…predisposes it towards the use of high-level imagery and spatial skills, which in turn just happen to be very useful when it comes to doing math reasoning,” said Michael O’Boyle, a psychologist at the University of Melbourne, Australia, in a public statement through the American Psychological Association.

In fact, the best math students don’t even seem to settle for being “left brain” people. A study undertaken by O’Boyle found mathematically gifted students did better than average students on tests that required both halves of the brain to cooperate. This demonstrated that, while the typical person might lean more heavily on one hemisphere or the other to do mental tasks necessary for math calculation, the brightest among us can more fully integrate both hemispheres of the brain.

The idea that emotion processing only occurs in the right brain hemisphere and fact processing in the left is also misleading. Brain imaging studies have showed that people processed emotion using small parts of both brain hemispheres.

“The popular notion of an ‘emotional’ right hemisphere that contrasts sharply with a ‘rational’ left hemisphere is like a crude pencil sketch made before a full-color painting,” noted a 2005 Scientific American Mind article.

Believing in left brain or right brain people also fails to account for the human brain’s mysterious flexibility and plasticity. People who had half their brain removed encounter some problems – like not being able to move or see from one side of their body – but largely retained or relearned mental abilities such as language in their remaining brain hemisphere. All this research clearly points out that while Nobel winner Sperry was onto something with his lateralization research, trying to fully compartmentalize mental activity by brain hemisphere is imprecise.

So what does the spinning dancer tell us? The whole test is more of an optical illusion than anything else, according to Steven Novella, an academic clinical neurologist at Yale University School of Medicine who blogs on NeuroLogica. When our brains process visual images to make some order or sense of the world, they have to make assumptions. The dancer is just a two dimensional image switching back and forth, but our brains process it as a three dimensional spinning object.

Depending on the assumptions made and visual cues picked up, your brain can make the dancer spin either way. When my friend first sent the test to me, I saw it go clockwise…then switch to counterclockwise as I was staring at the screen. What this tells me about my personality and mental abilities is hardly a no-brainer – the brain test connection to our mental strengths and weaknesses is nonexistent.