@Mcleanhatch......examining Glick's words

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#1
here is the transcript of when Glick appeared on the O'Reilly factor....you stated some shit about Glick on another post, and
you really didn't answer much for me....tell me again what you
think



_________________________________________________
SHOW: THE O'REILLY FACTOR (20:29)
February 4, 2003 Tuesday

Transcript # 020404cb.256

HEADLINE: Man Whose Father Died in Trade Center Signs Anti-War Ad

GUESTS: Jeremy Glick

BYLINE: Bill O'Reilly

---------------------------------

O'REILLY: In the "Personal Stories" segment tonight, we were surprised to find out than an American who lost his father in the World Trade Center attack had signed an anti-war advertisement that accused the USA itself of terrorism.

The offending passage read, "We too watched with shock the horrific events of September 11... we too mourned the thousands of innocent dead and shook our heads at the terrible scenes of carnage -- even as we recalled similar scenes in Baghdad, Panama City, and a generation ago, Vietnam."

With us now is Jeremy Glick, whose father, Barry, was a Port Authority worker at the Trade Center. Mr. Glick is a co-author of the book "Another World is Possible."

I'm surprised you signed this. You were the only one of all of the families who signed...

JEREMY GLICK, FATHER DIED IN WORLD TRADE CENTER: Well, actually, that's not true.

O'REILLY: Who signed the advertisement?

GLICK: Peaceful Tomorrow, which represents 9/11 families, were also involved.

O'REILLY: Hold it, hold it, hold it, Jeremy. You're the only one who signed this advertisement.

GLICK: As an individual.

O'REILLY: Yes, as -- with your name. You were the only one. I was surprised, and the reason I was surprised is that this ad equates the United States with the terrorists. And I was offended by that.

GLICK: Well, you say -- I remember earlier you said it was a moral equivalency, and it's actually a material equivalency. And just to back up for a second about your surprise, I'm actually shocked that you're surprised. If you think about it, our current president, who I feel and many feel is in this position illegitimately by neglecting the voices of Afro-Americans in the Florida coup, which, actually, somebody got impeached for during the Reconstruction period -- Our current president now inherited a legacy from his father and inherited a political legacy that's responsible for training militarily, economically, and situating geopolitically the parties involved in the alleged assassination and the murder of my father and countless of thousands of others. So I don't see why it's surprising...

O'REILLY: All right. Now let me stop you here. So...

GLICK: ... for you to think that I would come back and want to support...

O'REILLY: It is surprising, and I'll tell you why. I'll tell you why it's surprising.

GLICK: ... escalating...

O'REILLY: You are mouthing a far left position that is a marginal position in this society, which you're entitled to.

GLICK: It's marginal -- right.

O'REILLY: You're entitled to it, all right, but you're -- you see, even -- I'm sure your beliefs are sincere, but what upsets me is I don't think your father would be approving of this.

GLICK: Well, actually, my father thought that Bush's presidency was illegitimate.

O'REILLY: Maybe he did, but...

GLICK: I also didn't think that Bush...

O'REILLY: ... I don't think he'd be equating this country as a terrorist nation as you are.

GLICK: Well, I wasn't saying that it was necessarily like that.

O'REILLY: Yes, you are. You signed...

GLICK: What I'm saying is...

O'REILLY: ... this, and that absolutely said that.

GLICK: ... is that in -- six months before the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, starting in the Carter administration and continuing and escalating while Bush's father was head of the CIA, we recruited a hundred thousand radical mujahadeens to combat a democratic government in Afghanistan, the Turaki government.

O'REILLY: All right. I don't want to...

GLICK: Maybe...

O'REILLY: I don't want to debate world politics with you.

GLICK: Well, why not? This is about world politics.

O'REILLY: Because, No. 1, I don't really care what you think.

GLICK: Well, OK.

O'REILLY: You're -- I want to...

GLICK: But you do care because you...

O'REILLY: No, no. Look...

GLICK: The reason why you care is because you evoke 9/11...

O'REILLY: Here's why I care.

GLICK: ... to rationalize...

O'REILLY: Here's why I care...

GLICK: Let me finish. You evoke 9/11 to rationalize everything from domestic plunder to imperialistic aggression worldwide.

O'REILLY: OK. That's a bunch...

GLICK: You evoke sympathy with the 9/11 families.

O'REILLY: That's a bunch of crap. I've done more for the 9/11 families by their own admission -- I've done more for them than you will ever hope to do.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: So you keep your mouth shut when you sit here exploiting those people.

GLICK: Well, you're not representing me. You're not representing me.

O'REILLY: And I'd never represent you. You know why?

GLICK: Why?

O'REILLY: Because you have a warped view of this world and a warped view of this country.

GLICK: Well, explain that. Let me give you an example of a parallel...

O'REILLY: No, I'm not going to debate this with you, all right.

GLICK: Well, let me give you an example of parallel experience. On September 14...

O'REILLY: No, no. Here's -- here's the...

GLICK: On September 14...

O'REILLY: Here's the record.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: All right. You didn't support the action against Afghanistan to remove the Taliban. You were against it, OK.

GLICK: Why would I want to brutalize and further punish the people in Afghanistan...

O'REILLY: Who killed your father!

GLICK: The people in Afghanistan...

O'REILLY: Who killed your father.

GLICK: ... didn't kill my father.

O'REILLY: Sure they did. The al Qaeda people were trained there.

GLICK: The al Qaeda people? What about the Afghan people?

O'REILLY: See, I'm more angry about it than you are!

GLICK: So what about George Bush?

O'REILLY: What about George Bush? He had nothing to do with it.

GLICK: The director -- senior as director of the CIA.

O'REILLY: He had nothing to do with it.

GLICK: So the people that trained a hundred thousand Mujahadeen who were...

O'REILLY: Man, I hope your mom isn't watching this.

GLICK: Well, I hope she is.

O'REILLY: I hope your mother is not watching this because you -- that's it. I'm not going to say anymore.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: In respect for your father...

GLICK: On September 14, do you want to know what I'm doing?

O'REILLY: Shut up. Shut up.

GLICK: Oh, please don't tell me to shut up.

O'REILLY: As respect -- as respect -- in respect for your father, who was a Port Authority worker, a fine American, who got killed unnecessarily by barbarians...

GLICK: By radical extremists who were trained by this government...

O'REILLY: Out of respect for him...

GLICK: ... not the people of America.

O'REILLY: ... I'm not going to...

GLICK: ... The people of the ruling class, the small minority.

O'REILLY: Cut his mic. I'm not going to dress you down anymore, out of respect for your father.

We will be back in a moment with more of THE FACTOR.

GLICK: That means we're done?

O'REILLY: We're done.
 
Apr 25, 2002
537
0
0
41
#3
damn oreilly was pissed to.. i thought they was gonna start chunkin 'em or someshit.. hahaha.. I can't really comment too much thou cause I only saw the last part.. but oh well..
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#4
WHY IS IT THAT THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT THE WAR (PEOPLE LIKE MCLEANSMACK AND HIS PUPPY DOGS) TURN A BLIND EYE TO THE *FACT* THAT SADDAM RECEIVED ARMS AND MONEY FORM THE UNITED STATES???? WHY DONT THEY CONSIDER THE FACT THAT AMERICA TRAINED AL-QUEDA????

LMAO@ HOW MCLEANSHITHEAD NEVER EXPLAINED HIMSELF IN THE ORIGINAL THREAD (AND HE GAVE HALF ASS ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS)


:H:
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#5
SADDAM RECEIVED ARMS AND MONEY FORM THE UNITED STATES???? WHY DONT THEY CONSIDER THE FACT THAT AMERICA TRAINED AL-QUEDA????
all that does is bolster the case for war. why would we want people that we helped reach dangerous power to turn that on us? ive heard people say we should wait until we are hit first. ha ha ha!! imagine that, ON A GANGSTA RAP MESSAGE BOARD. HA HA HA!!!!
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#10
Mcleanhatch said:


i did catch all of it.

i told you guys that i missed most of it live on the factor

but i heard it that sunday on the radio on Matt Drudge

and i havent and wont change my mind. yes O'Reilly was rude to the guy but in my opinion he deserved it
go throught the transcript and point out extacty where he
missed up in your own view
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#12
all that does is bolster the case for war. why would we want people that we helped reach dangerous power to turn that on us?
why would they turn on us?
ive heard people say we should wait until we are hit first.
legally you have NO grounds for a WAR.

1.you havent been attacked

2.no international crisis is at hand

3.the un has not mandated a war.

so iraq has weapons and they are violating...is america violating by attacking and breaking the 3 rules above????
ha ha ha!! imagine that, ON A GANGSTA RAP MESSAGE BOARD. HA HA HA!!!!
what does gangsta rap have to do with it? when someone does mention how the MAJORITY of people on THIS site are frauds and cant bust a grape or how the majority of rappers are fake the consumers say "its only entertainment". so posting a message or opinion on this alleged "gangsta rap" message board or any message board is up to the individual.

i dont listen to "gangsta rap" nor do i listen to lynch.......yet im here........


@mcleanshitforbrains you said:


because they DIDNT! they trained the Mujahadeen against the Soviets. we never trained Al-Quida
is al queda comprised of mostly mujahideen?

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/terror-qaeda.html

pay attention to my next thread mcleanasshole

:H:
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#13
Snubnoze said:
give it up, I've asked him refusely to explain his comments in that previous thread and they were continiously avoided......
you asked the same questions as heresy. and i answered them now if you didnt like the answers that is not my fault
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#16
HERESY said:
@mcleanshitforbrains you said:

is al queda comprised of mostly mujahideen?

:H:
i know that Al-Quida is comprised of former "mujahadeen". but that doesnt mean that the "mujahadeen" was comprised of "Al-Quida".

was "Al-Quida" even around back then????
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#17
becuase IN MY OPINION he deserved it.

i thought you were gung-ho on opinions
ROFL!!! what kinda FUCK SHIT answer is that?

WHAT is IN YOUR OPINION!?!?!?!??!

When I say he didn't deserve it, I don't say "because thats my opinion" I say BECAUSE HE MADE NO FALSE CLAIMS AND WAS ACTING CALM AND LIKE A GENTLEMEN...

Opinions don't mean SHIT without an explanation for them.........
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#19
He hasn't EXPLAINED nothing. If he did, there wouldn't be multiple people still asking the same question...

Thats right Mcleanslut, go post some more articles. Your opinion don't mean shit because you can't even explain a simple ass statement.....
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#20
Mcleanhatch said:


i know that Al-Quida is comprised of former "mujahadeen". but that doesnt mean that the "mujahadeen" was comprised of "Al-Quida".

was "Al-Quida" even around back then????
im going to say this and it might seem a lil off but that can be answered with a yes or no....but it depends on WHO you ask. some will say it started with osama. some will say it started BEFORE him and with his TEACHER. so depending on what circle you are in.....the answer could be yes.....or no

lmao@mcleanslut


:H: