Look Whose Life Bush Destroyed

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#1
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#1
Friday, Jan. 30, 2004
Look Whose Life Bush Destroyed

While doing a search on the Web today we came across this fascinating "letter" posted on e-thepeople.org. Take a gander:

Bush cost me my job, my kids and my houses

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak my mind. I lost my job this past year. When Clinton was president I was secure and prosperous, but in the last year, we had to close our operations. We simply could not compete with foreign labor. This foreign labor worked for low pay under very bad conditions.

They worked very long shifts, and many even died on the job.

This competition could hardly be called "fair." I was forced out of the place where I had worked for 34 years.

Not a single government program was there to help me.

How can Bush call himself "compassionate?" Far worse, I lost two of my sons in Bush's evil war in Iraq. They gave their lives for their country, and for what? So that Bush's oil buddies can get rich. My pain of losing my sons is indescribable.

While it is trivial next to the loss of my sons, I regret to say that I also lost my home. I simply have nothing left. How can Bush call himself a Christian when he neglects people like me? I am a senior citizen with various medical problems. I'm not in a position where I can begin a new career. I was reduced to the point where I had to live in a hole in a ground, all because of President Bush.

And when the authorities found me there, did they have any compassion for my misfortune and ailments? No, I was arrested. Mr. Bush, I dare you to look me in the face and tell me you are a compassionate man! I dare you to look me in the face and tell me you are a Christian. If I had any money left, I would donate it to the Democrat Party.

If Al Gore had been elected in 2000 I would still have a job, a home, and most importantly, my dear sons!

Regards,
Saddam Hussein
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/1/30/93539.shtml
 
Snubnoze

Snubnoze

Sicc OG
#3
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#3
I could insert a bunch of pictures of dead afgahnistan/iraqi people who's life bush destroyed but not really in the mood for it :dead:
 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#4
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#4
Snubnoze said:
I could insert a bunch of pictures of dead afgahnistan people who's life bush destroyed but not really in the mood for it :dead:
Click to expand...
and i can do the same with the 9-11 victims who's lives Al-Qaeda and the Taliban destroyed

Snubnoze said:
I could insert a bunch of pictures of dead iraqi people who's life bush destroyed but not really in the mood for it :dead:
Click to expand...
and i can do the same with the Kuwaiti, Saudi, and Israeli victims who's lives Sadam and Iraq destroyed
 
shep

shep

Sicc OG
#5
Oct 2, 2002
3,233
2
0
#5
and i could do the same with americans whose lives were ruined because of bush, and cubans, and koreans, and africans, and europeans
 
m.w.merlino

m.w.merlino

Sicc OG
#12
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#12
^^^sociologically thats the way it should be, europe had rulers that did the same types of horrible things and umm...the spanish inquisition??? countries need to develop on their own timeline, societies cant be forced to turn into "us", who knows what couldve happened to iraq after saddam, who couldve overthrown him or what life in that country would be like 50 years from now, by "americanizing" countries we dont like, doesnt that ruin the potential culture and lifestyle that couldve been genuinely created there by its own? yes he killed people and was a cruel ruler, but at what time in history was there not one of those? he wasnt trying to take over the world, he has no WMD's and inspectors who have been to iraq hundreds of times have been saying that since the beginning, now that no WMD's are turning up, there going on this "false information" bullshit trip to turn around the fact that we were wrong and we were really going there for oil, iraq was a blind stab in the dark to appease americans who want osama found and killed, so we tried to tie saddam to 9-11 (which most americans think is true without any real evidence) and then take him out to forget what happened on 9-11 and make them feel like bush was doing his job when we all know the dumb fuck was on vacation 90% of the time and doing speeches that contain words he cant pronounce and sentences he cant finish -- and thats the real deal with it all regardless of what your trying to be blind too mclean, instead of gettin mad at you from now on im just gunna feel sorry for your ignorance. . .
 
Ethereal

Ethereal

Sicc OG
#13
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#13
KrypticFlowz said:
^^^sociologically thats the way it should be, europe had rulers that did the same types of horrible things and umm...the spanish inquisition??? countries need to develop on their own timeline, societies cant be forced to turn into "us", who knows what couldve happened to iraq after saddam, who couldve overthrown him or what life in that country would be like 50 years from now, by "americanizing" countries we dont like, doesnt that ruin the potential culture and lifestyle that couldve been genuinely created there by its own? yes he killed people and was a cruel ruler, but at what time in history was there not one of those? he wasnt trying to take over the world, he has no WMD's and inspectors who have been to iraq hundreds of times have been saying that since the beginning, now that no WMD's are turning up, there going on this "false information" bullshit trip to turn around the fact that we were wrong and we were really going there for oil, iraq was a blind stab in the dark to appease americans who want osama found and killed, so we tried to tie saddam to 9-11 (which most americans think is true without any real evidence) and then take him out to forget what happened on 9-11 and make them feel like bush was doing his job when we all know the dumb fuck was on vacation 90% of the time and doing speeches that contain words he cant pronounce and sentences he cant finish -- and thats the real deal with it all regardless of what your trying to be blind too mclean, instead of gettin mad at you from now on im just gunna feel sorry for your ignorance. . .
Click to expand...
Well said accept for one.. pretty big thing. Your right, he isn't the only ruler of this nature that we have seen over the years, not even close, and it make little sense to act on this one criminal and not any others, but something, somehow had to be done about him, and no one can deny that. The way your making it sound is that we should have left him alone and let Iraqi democracy play itself out, but the reality of it is that, it is a dictatorship and the people have no control whatsoever. They don't have funds or resources to even begin a resistance. The resistance in Iraq are pissed off anti-Saddam freedom fighters who carry a bag of rocks and pipes. Sending tens of thousands of American troops to invade the country might have been the wrong way to handle the situation, but Saddam and his regime needed to be taken out, without question. Should we have sent special forces to take him out? Yes. Should we have waited for a U.N. mandate? Yes. Should we have armed and funded Iraqi resistance, and let the people of Iraq prevail over their own leaders? Yes. The job was finished through extreme drastic measures, many of which need not be taken; thousands of soldiers have died, and Iraq is on it's way to being a more stable and economicly productive free nation. I don't like the way everything has played out, it's not the way I would have handled things, but Saddam and his regime are out of office, and for that I am thankful.
 
shep

shep

Sicc OG
#14
Oct 2, 2002
3,233
2
0
#14
something may have had to been done, but that doesn't mean making up fake reasons to go to war, then giving a 24 hour ultimatum to him.
 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#15
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#15
shep said:
something may have had to been done, but that doesn't mean making up fake reasons to go to war,

then giving a 24 hour ultimatum to him.
Click to expand...

at the time they werent known to be false, actually they were thought to be true. we still dont know if they are false. for all we know they might find WMD's tomorrow or next month.....

and by the way it wasnt a 24 hour ultimatum
 
shep

shep

Sicc OG
#17
Oct 2, 2002
3,233
2
0
#17
Mcleanhatch said:
at the time they werent known to be false, actually they were thought to be true. we still dont know if they are false. for all we know they might find WMD's tomorrow or next month.....

and by the way it wasnt a 24 hour ultimatum
Click to expand...
my bad, it was 48 hours.

and don't you think before we send innocent people to die, your intelligent should be pretty damn accurate? but then again, we knew he didn't have shit, bush just wanted an excuse to go in there
 
H

HIGHERRECORDS

Sicc OG
#19
Nov 3, 2003
518
0
0
#19
NOT JUST OVER THERE.................

C MON BUSH IS KILLIN OUR FOLKS AS WE SPEAK.MONEY IS NUMBER ONE PERIOD.HES SHOWIN US HOW TO TAKE CONTROL OF THE BLOCK SO WE GET ALL THE KNOCKS.THE ONLY WAY TO CHANGE THANGS IS TO PUT A VALUE ON INTEGRITY AND RIGHTOUSNESS.THEN NIGGAZ WOULDNT HAVE TO BE DOIN THEY THANG.NOT ALL BUT MOST KNOW WHATS RIGHT AND WRONG BUT WITHOUT AFFORDABLE LIVING WE RESORT TO GETTIN MONEY ANYWAY WE CAN.THAT ULTIMATELY BRINGS DEATH. FUCK IT THOUGH IT MUST BE MEANT TO BE.
 
JoMoDo

JoMoDo

Sicc OG
#20
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#20
McLeanhatch,

You seem fairly intellectual (although you lack much compassion for individuals struggling w/ the system), well educated, and informed. However, I hope you do understand there is no evidence linking Saddam to Osama and 9/11. Saddam needed to be removed, however I disagree with the tactics employed by our gov.

Also keep in mind that 17 of the 19 hijackers were in fact Saudi's, which lead to a war on terrorism in Afghanistan to a war preventing WMD in Iraq

ya dig...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom