LOAK FROM THE BLOK

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 11, 2002
1,405
78
48
#21
Biggest suggestion I can give you is work with the text man. That text that you use for your name should be ledgible if I didn't know you were EDJ I'd never think that says EDJ. The rest of the text needs to be changed too check out www.acidfonts.com they have plenty to choose from there. The images shouldn't have so much opacity on them. If you're presenting the album we should be seeing you and your artist more clearly. The one thing I can say about the images that nastynia put up the images and sharp and clear and yours should be too.
 
Oct 10, 2004
2,177
0
0
#30
nia i like your cartoon shit pretty sick man
edj looks busy in a bad way and the picture is what really ruins it
its not a bad angle just looks low quality
 
May 11, 2002
1,405
78
48
#32
This thread is hopeless man....Hopefullky EDJ got some useful feedback out of it to be able to do what he needs to do with that cover.
 
Jan 9, 2006
868
0
0
40
#33
TUNEZ_PWP said:
base4estaban those were exapmles of tight?or garbage?

CUZ THEM COVERS ARE STR8 TRASH !!
examples of what i look for in an album...in other words quality. Those albums are colorado classics hahaha... Call it what you want.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#34
DOU775,
THANKS FOR YOUR FEEDBAK. THAT'S WHAT I NEED, NOT SOME PERSONAL VENDETTA gRUDgE HAVIN' HATERISTIC COMMENTS. BUT THANKS FOR THAT LINK, I ALREADY HAVE THOUSANDS OF FONTS(THANKS TO THE HOMIE EVILWAYS). AND TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH, THAT WAS MY FIRST CRAK AT THE FONTS. WHICH ONES YOU THINK I SHOULD CHANgE(FONTS)? AND AS FAR AS THE "EDJ" LOgO AND SYMBOL, THAT'S NEVA EVA gONNA CHANgE. THAT'S MY UNIQUE PERSONAL LOgO THAT THE WORLD gONNA HAVE TO gET USED TO. AND WHEN YOU SPEAK OF THE OPACITY, WHICH IMAgE ARE YOU TALKIN' BOUT? CAUSE IF YOU KNEW WHAT I WAS TRYIN' TO ACCOMPLISH, I THINK YOU WOULD SUgKEST DIFFERENT. AND THE MORE OPACITY THE CLEARER AIN'T IT? THE LESS OPACITY THE LESS AND MORE TRANSPARENT THE IMAgE RIgHT? ARE YOU SURE YOU TYPED THAT RIgHT("The images shouldn't have so much opacity on them. If you're presenting the album we should be seeing you and your artist more clearly.")?

TUNE_PWP,
WHAT PICTURE RUINS IT?

BASE4ESTEBAN,
DON'T EVEN BOTHER ARgUIN' WITH THE CHILDREN. EVERYBODY HAS AN OPINION.

AND NIA,
AND SINCE DID THIS THREAD BECOME YOUR ALBUM COVERS AgAINST MY SINgLE ONE? YOU REALLY NEED TO QUIT THINKIN' WITH YOUR EMOTIONS. AND FOR THE RECORD, YOU STILL YET TO DRAW SOME SHIT TO COMPETE AgAINST ME. I NEVA CLAIMED TO BE SUPERIOR IN gRAPHICS.
 
Oct 10, 2004
2,177
0
0
#35
quality music usally dont come from garbage covers takes money to make money

shit look at the sig in my shit that is a ruff draft the finished cover is a lil cleaner and a lil better not much but it only costed 150 bucks so fuck it you know but i aint gonna lie to me it aint quality and the shit still sits in boxs in a living room never released
 

og MS

Member since 1997
Apr 25, 2002
5,533
100
63
50
www.killavalley.com
#36
EDJ,

I'd say start with some higher res photos. Maybe upgrade from PS 5.02 to at least PS7... Easier to navigate in the newer versions. But most of all.. just keep workin and do what suits your tastes.

These cats comin' on your thread tryin to boss up but to be honest , I'm not the least bit impressed with what they claim is real shit. The realist shit on the market from this way is of course Essqubed, Photodoctors, 580 Design and even Made Pro and Upheaval Designs are nice. There's also talented folks in this forum doin it big as well like DubbA, EW and others. Of course this is my opinion.

The pics are very important in a design ... work on the pics first and foremost and almost everything else will fall in line for you.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#38
MS,
WHAT'S UP CUZZ? I FEEL YOU MAYNE. NOW I KNOW I CAN DEPEND ON YOUR ADVICE. BUT MY FAULT FOR TALKIN' BOUT MY MAK 5.02 VERSION. I FORgOT THAT IT IS 7.0 THAT I gOT ON MY PC. THE RESOLUTION OF THOSE PICTURES IS SOME HIgH DEFINITION JPEg FILES FROM A DIgITAL CAMERA WITH 4.0 MEgAPIXELS(NIKON COOLPIX 4800). IT MIgHT BE THE EFFECTS OR LIgHTIN' THAT RENDERS THEM HOW THEY ARE. I DON'T KNOW. WHAT YOU THINK? HOW CAN I BRINg THESE PICTURES OUT?
 
Oct 7, 2002
3,127
25
0
www.LadyTragik.com
#39
@ EDJ, here are some things i noticed right off the bat

- way too many fonts, limit yourself to 2-3 at the most

- the cut out of the guy in the background is too rigid, make it smoother

- create one main object that will draw the viewers attention to your design, not a whole bunch of scattered things

- try bringing out some colors...if its teal you're going to use, bring out that teal... don't make it look so bland
 
Oct 7, 2002
3,127
25
0
www.LadyTragik.com
#40
oh and last peace of advice:

THE RESOLUTION OF THOSE PICTURES IS SOME HIgH DEFINITION JPEg FILES FROM A DIgITAL CAMERA WITH 4.0 MEgAPIXELS(NIKON COOLPIX 4800).
get rid of that camera! post some raw photos you've taken without any photoshop on it so we can give you tips on bringing out the colors