Lab creates 'supermouse'

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
A genetically modified "supermouse" which can run twice as far as a normal rodent has been created by scientists working in the US.



It also lives longer, and breeds later in life compared with its standard laboratory cousin.

The research has been conducted at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.

Details of the scientists' new transgenic animals are published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry.

The mice were produced to study the biochemistry at play in metabolism and could aid the understanding of human health and disease.

The GM rodents can run five to six kilometres at a speed of 20 meters per minute on a treadmill, for up to six hours before stopping.

"They are metabolically similar to Lance Armstrong biking up the Pyrenees; they utilise mainly fatty acids for energy and produce very little lactic acid," said Professor Richard Hanson, the senior author on the journal article.

He told BBC News: "The muscles of these mice have many more mitochondria. These are the little 'engines' in the cell that produce energy. For some reason, the number of mitochondria are around 10 times more than we see in the muscle of their littermates."

The mice over-express a gene responsible for the enzyme phosphoenolypyruvate carboxykinases (PEPCK-C). Normal expression is in the liver, in the production of glucose.

The scientists found their new mice would eat twice as much as normal mice - but weigh half as much. They could also give birth at three years old - which in human terms is akin to an 80-year-old woman giving birth.

Other research groups have produced similar novel rodents by altering different aspects of their genetics. One criticism of the work is that it could open the door to abuse, with the spectre of athletes resorting to gene therapy to try to improve their performance.

But Professor Hanson played this down. "Right now, this is impossible to do - putting a gene into muscle. It's unethical. And I don't think you'd want to do this. These animals are rather aggressive, we've noticed."

Scientists say such work is more likely to help them understand human conditions, such as those which lead to wasting of the muscles.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7074831.stm
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
0
42
#2
This could very wel be used to create a breed of lab breeded (sp?) "super soldier" something along the line of the movie "Universal soldier" but then biological.

This is the very first thought that pops into my head after reading this artical...
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#3
Whether we want it or not, gene therapy, and at a later stage, direct genetic modifications of the zygote will be done, sometimes for highly dangerous purposes (the word "unethical" doesn't have much meaning for me)

The only way to minimize the risks associated with this is to change our ways of thinking and this starts with the elimination/reevaluation of those same moral/ethical "fundamentals of our society"
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#10
Interesting:

One bodybuilder (Ronnie Coleman, pictured here) is already suspected of having done gene doping to limit myostatin production. He was already a phenomenal physical specimen, but he changed the nature of bodybuilding by competing at nearly 300 pounds with a minimal 4% bodyfat.



http://integral-options.blogspot.com/2007/08/drugs-in-sports.html

LOL, looks natural to me
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#12
What?

Youre out of your mind, bro.

In all honesty, youre no better than the other side of the coin.

:ermm:
You don't get it...

Morality and ethics are not carved in stone, these vary a lot between different cultures and times. Morality originates from the evolutionary history of our species when certain behavioral pattern provided selective advantage to the groups that exhibited them. That is to say that from such a perspective what is moral to do is what is best for the population and this depends a lot on the situation and not at all on what the ethical standards before that were....

That's why I say that the word "unethical" doesn't have much meaning...

and it's not that people stick to these "standards" it in real life, quite the opposite
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#13
Interesting:

One bodybuilder (Ronnie Coleman, pictured here) is already suspected of having done gene doping to limit myostatin production. He was already a phenomenal physical specimen, but he changed the nature of bodybuilding by competing at nearly 300 pounds with a minimal 4% bodyfat.



http://integral-options.blogspot.com/2007/08/drugs-in-sports.html

LOL, looks natural to me
When I'm looking at Ronnie Coleman's upper body, I start to think that it must be actually really inconvenient to live with such a huge muscle mass on you:confused:

If you think about it he can probably only sleep on his back and I can't imagine how he's able to reach and wipe his ass:confused::confused: