Kansas City Chiefs 2010
- Thread starter JLMACN
- Start date
we didn't say for sure you'd lose
we just said it wasn't a for sure win
obviously you guys won... but don't act like even non-biased people weren't picking the Rams to win
anyways... fuck you guys for winning... faggots
we won too
we still in the division race... it aint over till the bitch starts singing... fuck the Queefs!!!!
RAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIDERS!
we just said it wasn't a for sure win
obviously you guys won... but don't act like even non-biased people weren't picking the Rams to win
anyways... fuck you guys for winning... faggots
we won too
we still in the division race... it aint over till the bitch starts singing... fuck the Queefs!!!!
RAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIDERS!
we never said STL has a great homefield advantage
we said they've played well at home this year... not positive now... but they had a winning record going into that game, I think they still do
we never fucking said... "the Rams have great fans and have an awesome 12th man and homefield advantage"
READ, breh... READ!!!!
you guys twisted that shit into your own words and tried to flip it around and act like we were being delusional...
also, there was talks about Cassell not playing... and speculation of how well he'd play... so of course that's gonna make people lean towards STL
oh, btw... THE RAMS WERE FAVORED TO WIN THAT GAME BY LAS VEGAS...
so don't act like it was only Raiders fans picking against you guys
we said they've played well at home this year... not positive now... but they had a winning record going into that game, I think they still do
we never fucking said... "the Rams have great fans and have an awesome 12th man and homefield advantage"
READ, breh... READ!!!!
you guys twisted that shit into your own words and tried to flip it around and act like we were being delusional...
also, there was talks about Cassell not playing... and speculation of how well he'd play... so of course that's gonna make people lean towards STL
oh, btw... THE RAMS WERE FAVORED TO WIN THAT GAME BY LAS VEGAS...
so don't act like it was only Raiders fans picking against you guys
You said rams would win because "they play great at home." That doesnt mean you said they have a 12th man or anything. And you did say the raiders will beat the chiefs at arrowhead. Which i said made no sense since "we play great at home".
READ BREH READ
And every raider fan picked us to lose FOR sure. ONCE AGAN sorry your lumped in with idiots.
Fuck vegas anyway lol
READ BREH READ
And every raider fan picked us to lose FOR sure. ONCE AGAN sorry your lumped in with idiots.
Fuck vegas anyway lol
Chiefs' Charles comes within .02 yards of setting NFL record
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Chiefs-Charles-comes-within-02-yards-of-settin?urn=nfl-302853
The distance is only 0.72 inches. If Jamaal Charles(notes) of the Kansas City Chiefs had gained that much more per carry this season, he'd have unseated an NFL legend in the record books.
The explosive Chiefs running back finished with 6.38 yards per rush this season, an average which left him narrowly behind Jim Brown's record of 6.4 yards per carry, set in 1963. (Other ball carriers have finished with higher averages -- Michael Vick(notes) ran for 8.4 yards per attempt in 2006 and 6.8 this season -- but not as running backs.)
That's a difference of .02 yards, .06 feet, 0.72 inches, 1.88 centimeters or 18 millimeters. It's less than the length of the "return" key on your keyboard.
Over the course of the season, Charles would have needed five more total yards on his 230 carries to set the mark. Five yards over a season. That's nothing. As we saw Sunday night in Seattle, the difference between a few yards can be as simple as where the official spots the football. Charles was thisclose to setting the record.
Sure, it's not a flashy one and is only well-known because the legendary Brown had the mark but, regardless, ousting a Hall of Famer from the record books would have been a nice achievement for Charles and the Chiefs offensive line. (It also might have drawn more attention to the fact that Kansas City only handed the ball to the efficient Charles 230 times. I'm all for limiting carries to prevent injury, but someone running for over 6 yards per carry should be getting it more than 14 times a game.)
As the Kansas City Star pointed out, Charles temporarily had the record during Sunday's loss to the Oakland Raiders, but lost it when he was stuffed for a 1-yard loss with 7:55 remaining. He didn't have another carry for the rest of the afternoon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
that sucks.
god damn Raiders! lol
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Chiefs-Charles-comes-within-02-yards-of-settin?urn=nfl-302853
The distance is only 0.72 inches. If Jamaal Charles(notes) of the Kansas City Chiefs had gained that much more per carry this season, he'd have unseated an NFL legend in the record books.
The explosive Chiefs running back finished with 6.38 yards per rush this season, an average which left him narrowly behind Jim Brown's record of 6.4 yards per carry, set in 1963. (Other ball carriers have finished with higher averages -- Michael Vick(notes) ran for 8.4 yards per attempt in 2006 and 6.8 this season -- but not as running backs.)
That's a difference of .02 yards, .06 feet, 0.72 inches, 1.88 centimeters or 18 millimeters. It's less than the length of the "return" key on your keyboard.
Over the course of the season, Charles would have needed five more total yards on his 230 carries to set the mark. Five yards over a season. That's nothing. As we saw Sunday night in Seattle, the difference between a few yards can be as simple as where the official spots the football. Charles was thisclose to setting the record.
Sure, it's not a flashy one and is only well-known because the legendary Brown had the mark but, regardless, ousting a Hall of Famer from the record books would have been a nice achievement for Charles and the Chiefs offensive line. (It also might have drawn more attention to the fact that Kansas City only handed the ball to the efficient Charles 230 times. I'm all for limiting carries to prevent injury, but someone running for over 6 yards per carry should be getting it more than 14 times a game.)
As the Kansas City Star pointed out, Charles temporarily had the record during Sunday's loss to the Oakland Raiders, but lost it when he was stuffed for a 1-yard loss with 7:55 remaining. He didn't have another carry for the rest of the afternoon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
that sucks.
god damn Raiders! lol